Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students' understanding of acid, base, and ph concepts

We investigated how different levels of information presented by various technologies affected secondary students' understanding of acid, base, and pH concepts. Secondary students who were selected for the study had just completed their study of acid–base chemistry. No attempt was made to provide further instruction. We analyzed changes in the understanding of individual students by constructing concept maps from the propositions that the students used in interviews conducted before and after a series of acid–base titrations. After the initial interview, students were divided into three groups. Within each group, students individually performed the same set of titrations using different technologies: chemical indicators, pH meters, and microcomputer-based laboratories (MBL). After the titrations were completed, all students were interviewed again. We found that students using MBL exhibited a larger positive shift in their concept map scores, which indicates a greater differentiation and integration of their knowledge of acids and bases. The chemical indicator students exhibited a more moderate positive shift in their concept map scores, and the pH meter students exhibited a smaller positive shift. We also found that the MBL students constructed more inappropriate links in their concept maps than the chemical indicator or pH meter students. However, we speculate that this increased number of inappropriate links indicates a high level of involvement with the technology. We therefore argue that the level of information offered by the technology affected students' understanding of the chemical concepts.

[1]  Jill H. Larkin,et al.  A Research Methodology for Studying How People Think. , 1984 .

[2]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Research Strategy for the Dynamic Study of Students' Concepts and Problem Solving Strategies Using Science Software. , 1988 .

[3]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A protocol analysis of the influence of technology on students' actions, verbal commentary, and thought processes during the performance of acid‐base titrations , 1993 .

[4]  J. Mintzes,et al.  The concept map as a research tool: Exploring conceptual change in biology , 1990 .

[5]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  New stars for the teacher to steer by , 1984 .

[6]  B. Andersson,et al.  Pupils' Explanations of Some Aspects of Chemical Reactions. , 1986 .

[7]  M. Wittrock Learning as a Generative Process , 1974 .

[8]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning science: A generative process , 1983 .

[9]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Establishing a research base for science education: Challenges, trends, and recommendations , 1986 .

[10]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Cognitive consequences of microcomputer-based laboratories: Graphing skills development* , 1987 .

[11]  W. L. Yarroch Student Understanding of Chemical Equation Balancing. , 1985 .

[12]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Why changing the curriculum may not be enough , 1992 .

[13]  M. C. Wittrock,et al.  The Cognitive Movement in Instruction , 1979 .

[14]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Using Technology to Teach Thermodynamics: Achieving Integrated Understanding , 1993 .

[15]  M. Nakhleh Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions , 1992 .

[16]  D. Gabel,et al.  Understanding the Particulate Nature of Matter. , 1987 .