Deforestation and forest regeneration following small-scale gold mining in the Amazon: the case of Suriname

Despite scientific concern about Amazon deforestation and the impacts of the Amazon gold rush, few researchers have assessed the long-term impacts of small-scale gold mining on forest cover. This study estimates deforestation from gold mining and analyses the regeneration of abandoned mining areas in the Suriname Amazon. Fieldwork in December 1998 included observations and ecological measurements, as well as qualitative interviews with local miners about mining history and technology. Vegetation cover of abandoned mining sites of different ages was compared with that in old-growth forest. By present estimates, gold miners clear 48–96 km2 of old-growth forest in Suriname annually. Based on different assumptions about changes in technology and the amount of mining that takes place on previously mined sites, cumulative deforestation is expected to reach 750–2280 km2 by 2010. Furthermore, the analysis of abandoned mining sites suggests that forest recovery following mining is slow and qualitatively inferior compared to regeneration following other land uses. Unlike areas in nearby old-growth forest, large parts of mined areas remain bare ground, grass, and standing water. The area deforested by mining may seem relatively small, but given the slow forest recovery and the concentration of mining in selected areas, small-scale gold mining is expected to reduce local forest cover and ecosystem services in regions where mining takes place.

[1]  M. Heemskerk.  Driving forces of small-scale gold mining among the Ndjuka Maroons : a cross-scale socioeconomic analysis of participation in gold mining in Suriname , 2000 .

[2]  C. Uhl,et al.  The regional impacts of small-scale gold mining in Amazonia , 1996 .

[3]  M. Heemskerk.  Gender and Gold Mining: The Case of the Maroons of Suriname , 2000 .

[4]  Ricardo A Godey.  Technical and Economic Efficiency of Peasant Miners in Bolivia , 1985 .

[5]  P. Fearnside.  Biodiversity as an environmental service in Brazil's Amazonian forests: risks, value and conservation , 1999, Environmental Conservation.

[6]  Gordon Macmillan.  At the End of the Rainbow? Gold, Land and People in the Brazilian Amazon , 1995 .

[7]  C. Uhl.  FACTORS CONTROLLING SUCCESSION FOLLOWING SLASH-AND-BURN AGRICULTURE IN AMAZONIA , 1987 .

[8]  Marcello M. Veiga,et al.  Introducing New Technologies for Abatement of Global Mercury Pollution in , 1997 .

[9]  J. D. Kom,et al.  Mercury Exposure of Maroon Workers in the Small Scale Gold Mining in Suriname , 1998 .

[10]  R. B. Clark.  Water, air and soil pollution , 1972 .

[11]  C. Ireland.  Fundamental concepts in the design of experiments , 1964 .

[12]  A. Rodríguez-Acosta,et al.  HIV/STD transmission in gold-mining areas of Bolívar State, Venezuela: interventions for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. , 1999, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.

[13]  D. Cleary.  Anatomy of the Amazon gold rush , 1990 .

[14]  P. G. Murphy,et al.  EARLY PLANT SUCCESSION AFTER CUTTING AND BURNING IN THE UPPER RIO NEGRO REGION OF THE AMAZON BASIN , 1981 .

[15]  Leonie Kohl,et al.  Fundamental Concepts in the Design of Experiments , 2000 .

[16]  F. A. de Wolff,et al.  Mercury exposure of maroon workers in the small scale gold mining in Suriname. , 1998, Environmental research.

[17]  Y. Takizawa,et al.  Human exposure to mercury due to goldmining in the Tapajos River basin, Amazon, Brazil: Speciation of mercury in human hair, blood and urine , 1995 .

[18]  W. Jonkers.  Vegetation Structure, Logging Damage and Silviculture in a Tropical Rain Forest in Suriname , 1987 .

[19]  T. Whitmore.  (3) Vegetation structure, logging damage and silviculture in a tropical rain forest in suriname: By W. B. J. Jonkers. 1987. All obtainable from the Department of Silviculture, Agricultural University, PO Box 342 AH, Wageningen, Holland , 1989 .