STAG2 loss-of-function affects short-range genomic contacts and modulates urothelial differentiation in bladder cancer cells

Cohesin exists in two variants, containing either STAG1 or STAG2. STAG2 is one of the most commonly mutated genes in human cancer, and a major bladder cancer tumor suppressor. Little is known about how its inactivation contributes to tumor development. Here, we analyze the genomic distribution of STAG1 and STAG2 and perform STAG2 loss-of-function experiments using RT112 bladder cancer cells; we then analyze the resulting genomic effects by integrating gene expression and chromatin interaction data. Cohesin-STAG2 is required for DNA contacts within topological domains, but not for compartment maintenance of domain boundary integrity. Cohesin-STAG2-mediated interactions are short-ranged and engage promoters and gene bodies with higher frequency than those mediated by cohesin-STAG1. STAG2 knockdown resulted in a modest but consistent down-regulation of the luminal urothelial differentiation signature, mirroring differences between STAG2-high and STAG2-low bladder tumors. Both lost and gained contacts were enriched among STAG1/STAG2 common sites as well as STAG2-enriched sites. Contacts lost upon depletion of STAG2 were significantly assortative, indicating their proximity at the 3D level, and were associated with changes in gene expression. Overall, our findings indicate that, in urothelial cells, STAG2 is required for the establishment and/or maintenance of DNA looping that, in turn, sustains the luminal differentiation program. This mechanism may contribute to the tumor suppressor function of STAG2 in bladder cancer.

[1]  Ilya J. Finkelstein,et al.  Human cohesin compacts DNA by loop extrusion , 2019, Science.

[2]  Y. Kawasawa,et al.  Repression of transcription factor AP-2 alpha by PPARγ reveals a novel transcriptional circuit in basal-squamous bladder cancer , 2019, Oncogenesis.

[3]  Ashley M. Laughney,et al.  Urothelial organoids originating from Cd49fhigh mouse stem cells display Notch-dependent differentiation capacity , 2019, Nature Communications.

[4]  D. Surdez,et al.  STAG Mutations in Cancer. , 2019, Trends in cancer.

[5]  M. Martí-Renom,et al.  Specific Contributions of Cohesin-SA1 and Cohesin-SA2 to TADs and Polycomb Domains in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2019, Cell reports.

[6]  W. V. van IJcken,et al.  Redundant and specific roles of cohesin STAG subunits in chromatin looping and transcription control , 2019, bioRxiv.

[7]  Christopher J. Ott,et al.  Stag1 and Stag2 regulate cell fate decisions in hematopoiesis through non-redundant topological control , 2019, bioRxiv.

[8]  Mauro A. A. Castro,et al.  A Consensus Molecular Classification of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer , 2019, European urology.

[9]  V. Corces,et al.  Organizational principles of 3D genome architecture , 2018, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[10]  A. Losada,et al.  Establishing and dissolving cohesion during the vertebrate cell cycle. , 2018, Current opinion in cell biology.

[11]  Erez Lieberman Aiden,et al.  Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains , 2017, Cell.

[12]  D. Pisano,et al.  Nextpresso: Next Generation Sequencing Expression Analysis Pipeline , 2017, Current Bioinformatics.

[13]  Marc A Marti-Renom,et al.  Distinct roles of cohesin-SA1 and cohesin-SA2 in 3D chromosome organization , 2017, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

[14]  Marc A. Martí-Renom,et al.  Automatic analysis and 3D-modelling of Hi-C data using TADbit reveals structural features of the fly chromatin colors , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  C. Rudin,et al.  Unravelling the biology of SCLC: implications for therapy , 2017, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[16]  A. Losada,et al.  Cohesin Mutations in Cancer. , 2016, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.

[17]  R. Sullivan,et al.  Loss of cohesin complex components STAG2 or STAG3 confers resistance to BRAF inhibition in melanoma , 2016, Nature Medicine.

[18]  M. L. Calle,et al.  Comprehensive Transcriptional Analysis of Early-Stage Urothelial Carcinoma. , 2016, Cancer cell.

[19]  James T. Robinson,et al.  Juicebox Provides a Visualization System for Hi-C Contact Maps with Unlimited Zoom. , 2016, Cell systems.

[20]  L. Mirny,et al.  Formation of Chromosomal Domains in Interphase by Loop Extrusion , 2015, bioRxiv.

[21]  Peng Guo,et al.  KLF5 promotes cell migration by up‐regulating FYN in bladder cancer cells , 2016, FEBS letters.

[22]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  Integrating epigenomic data and 3D genomic structure with a new measure of chromatin assortativity , 2015, Genome Biology.

[23]  Tin-Lap Lee,et al.  Hypermethylation of genes in testicular embryonal carcinomas , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  Neva C. Durand,et al.  Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Zhongmei Zhou,et al.  BAP1 promotes breast cancer cell proliferation and metastasis by deubiquitinating KLF5 , 2015, Nature Communications.

[26]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  CRISPR Inversion of CTCF Sites Alters Genome Topology and Enhancer/Promoter Function , 2015, Cell.

[27]  A. Valencia,et al.  The UBC-40 Urothelial Bladder Cancer cell line index: a genomic resource for functional studies , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[28]  Neva C. Durand,et al.  A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping , 2014, Cell.

[29]  R. Levine,et al.  Genetic alterations of the cohesin complex genes in myeloid malignancies. , 2014, Blood.

[30]  A. McKenna,et al.  The genomic landscape of pediatric Ewing sarcoma. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[31]  Jun S. Wei,et al.  The Genomic Landscape of the Ewing Sarcoma Family of Tumors Reveals Recurrent STAG2 Mutation , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[32]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumor types , 2014, Nature.

[33]  C. Taylor,et al.  Frequent inactivating mutations of STAG2 in bladder cancer are associated with low tumour grade and stage and inversely related to chromosomal copy number changes , 2013, Human molecular genetics.

[34]  A. Valencia,et al.  Recurrent inactivation of STAG2 in bladder cancer is not associated with aneuploidy , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[35]  M. Rubin,et al.  Frequent truncating mutations of STAG2 in bladder cancer , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[36]  Huanming Yang,et al.  Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing of bladder cancer identifies frequent alterations in genes involved in sister chromatid cohesion and segregation , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[37]  Jennifer E. Phillips-Cremins,et al.  Architectural Protein Subclasses Shape 3D Organization of Genomes during Lineage Commitment , 2013, Cell.

[38]  D. Dorsett,et al.  Genome-Wide Control of RNA Polymerase II Activity by Cohesin , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[39]  A. Losada,et al.  Cohesin, a chromatin engagement ring. , 2013, Current opinion in cell biology.

[40]  Masao Nagasaki,et al.  Recurrent mutations in multiple components of the cohesin complex in myeloid neoplasms , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[41]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  The Origin and Evolution of Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia , 2012, Cell.

[42]  D. Pisano,et al.  A unique role of cohesin‐SA1 in gene regulation and development , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[43]  M. Blasco,et al.  Cohesin‐SA1 deficiency drives aneuploidy and tumourigenesis in mice due to impaired replication of telomeres , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[44]  I. Ellis,et al.  Differential oestrogen receptor binding is associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer , 2011, Nature.

[45]  Huanming Yang,et al.  Frequent mutations of chromatin remodeling genes in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[46]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Mutational Inactivation of STAG2 Causes Aneuploidy in Human Cancer , 2011, Science.

[47]  Philip Machanick,et al.  MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets , 2011, Bioinform..

[48]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Mediator and Cohesin Connect Gene Expression and Chromatin Architecture , 2010, Nature.

[49]  B. Czerniak,et al.  Molecular genetics of bladder cancer: Emerging mechanisms of tumor initiation and progression. , 2010, Urologic oncology.

[50]  C. Glass,et al.  Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[51]  Susan Smith,et al.  Differential regulation of telomere and centromere cohesion by the Scc3 homologues SA1 and SA2, respectively, in human cells , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[52]  J. Dekker,et al.  Capturing Chromosome Conformation , 2002, Science.

[53]  Florentino Fernández Riverola,et al.  RUbioSeq+: A multiplatform application that executes parallelized pipelines to analyse next-generation sequencing data , 2017, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[54]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. , 2009, Science.