Evolution and prognostic impact of low flow after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Objective Low flow (LF), defined as stroke volume index (SVi) <35 mL/m2, prior to the procedure has been recently identified as a powerful independent predictor of early and late mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The objectives of this study were to determine the evolution of SVi following TAVR and to assess the determinants and impact on mortality of early postprocedural SVi (EP-SVi). Methods We retrospectively analysed the clinical, Doppler echocardiographic and outcome data prospectively collected in 255 patients who underwent TAVR. Echocardiograms were performed before (baseline), within 5 days after procedure (early post procedure) and 6 months to 1 year following TAVR (late post procedure). Results Patients with EP-SVi <35 mL/m2 (n=138; 54%) had increased mortality (HR 1.97, p=0.003) compared with those with EP-SVi ≥35 mL/m2 (n=117; 46%). Furthermore, patients with baseline SVi (B-SVi) <35 mL/m2 and EP-SVI ≥35 mL/m2, that is, normalised flow, had better survival (HR 0.46, p=0.03) than those with both B-SVi and EP-SVi <35 mL/m2, that is, persistent LF, and similar survival compared with those with both B-SVi and EP-SVi ≥35 mL/m2, that is, maintained normal flow. In a multivariable model analysis, EP-SVi was independently associated with increased risk of mortality (HR 1.41 per 10 mL/m2 decrease, p=0.03). The preprocedural/intraprocedural factors associated with lower EP-SVi were lower B-SVi (standardised β [β] 0.36, p<0.001) atrial fibrillation (β −0.13, p=0.02) and transapical approach (β −0.22, p<0.001). Conclusions The measurement of EP-SVi is useful to assess the immediate haemodynamic benefit of TAVR and to predict the risk of late mortality.

[1]  F. Fernández‐Avilés,et al.  Systemic vascular load in calcific degenerative aortic valve stenosis: insight from percutaneous valve replacement. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Management of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: need for an integrated approach, including assessment of symptoms, hypertension, and stenosis severity. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  T. Sundt,et al.  Correction: 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2014) 63 (2438-88)) , 2014 .

[4]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[6]  N. Moat,et al.  Do outcomes from transcatheter aortic valve implantation vary according to access route and valve type? The UK TAVI Registry. , 2014, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[7]  P. Wenaweser,et al.  Clinical outcomes of patients with low-flow, low-gradient, severe aortic stenosis and either preserved or reduced ejection fraction undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2013, European heart journal.

[8]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Impact of low flow on the outcome of high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  Minjian Kong,et al.  Comparison 30-day clinical complications between transfemoral versus transapical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis review , 2013, Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery.

[10]  J. Bavaria,et al.  Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Therapy in Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) Trial Analysis , 2013, Circulation.

[11]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyIncidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Literature , 2013 .

[12]  I. Barbash,et al.  Impact of transapical aortic valve replacement on apical wall motion. , 2013, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[13]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  P. Leprince,et al.  Registry of transcatheter aortic-valve implantation in high-risk patients. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  K. Kuck,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[17]  E. Donal,et al.  Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Pascal Vranckx,et al.  Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Validation and characterization of transcatheter aortic valve effective orifice area measured by Doppler echocardiography. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[20]  M. Cheitlin Comparison Between Transcatheter and Surgical Prosthetic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction , 2011 .

[21]  A. Mügge,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for treatment of patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses—valve‐in‐valve technique , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[22]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Comparison Between Transcatheter and Surgical Prosthetic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction , 2010, Circulation.

[23]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  M. Beer,et al.  Impact of Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis , 2009, Circulation.

[25]  J. Chambers,et al.  Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[26]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Ejection Fraction Is Associated With Higher Afterload and Reduced Survival , 2007, Circulation.

[27]  Youshouzhai Gu Echo , 1980, The Craft of Poetry.