The paradox of public science and global business: CSIRO, commercialisation and the national system of innovation in Australia

Abstract This article describes three case studies of the commercialisation of early-stage technologies involving Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); extended-wear contact lenses, biostable biocompatible polymers for medical implant devices, and biodegradable biocompatible polymers for medical implant devices. The case studies extend the portfolio of detailed, highly contextualised studies of innovation in the Australian context. They also provide a window into CSIRO, commercialisation pathways and the national system of innovation in Australia. In particular, they highlight the paradox of public science and global business in the Australian context. The paradox is that global business depends upon public science for innovation more than ever, but makes it increasingly difficult for countries to capture the benefits of public science. It adds major complexity to the successful realisation of a more commercial approach by Australia’s public research organisations such as CSIRO, and the capture of benefits from the national system of innovation.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  David H. Solomon,et al.  Australia's plastic banknotes: fighting counterfeit currency. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[3]  C. Freeman The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[4]  D. Mowery,et al.  The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University–Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments? , 2004 .

[5]  Jane Marceau The knowledge tree: CSIRO in Australia’s innovation systems , 2007 .

[6]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[7]  Garrett Upstill,et al.  Adjusting to changing times: CSIRO since the 1970s , 2007 .

[8]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Outsourcing innovation the new engine of growth , 2000 .

[9]  Garrett Upstill,et al.  New Structures, New Strategies: CSIRO’s Changing Role in Australian Innovation , 2008 .

[10]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[11]  William I. Robinson,et al.  Global Capitalism Theory and the Emergence of Transnational Elites , 2012 .

[12]  S. Berg Snowball Sampling—I , 2006 .

[13]  Michael Gilding,et al.  'The tyranny of distance': Biotechnology networks and clusters in the antipodes , 2008 .

[14]  Lorraine Chiroiu,et al.  Powering Ideas: An Innovation Agenda for the 21st Century , 2009 .

[15]  James F. Doyle,et al.  Radical Innovation: how mature companies can outsmart upstarts , 2001, UBIQ.

[16]  Lyndal Thorburn Spinning along: CSIRO’s knowledge business , 2007 .

[17]  David F. Channell Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[18]  Brad Collis,et al.  Fields of Discovery: Australia's CSIRO , 2002 .

[19]  Willis,et al.  A CSIRO Invention and the Development of the Australian Spectroscopic Instrument Industry , 2005 .

[20]  Tage Koed Madsen,et al.  An inquiry into born‐global firms in Europe and the USA , 2004 .

[21]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Methods for Studying Innovation Development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program , 1990 .

[22]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[23]  Alina Kudina,et al.  Born Global , 2008 .