Exploration of the Key Factors for Optimizing the in Vivo Oral Delivery of Insulin by Using a Noncovalent Strategy with Cell-Penetrating Peptides.

This present study aimed to determine the optimal oral insulin delivery conditions that would maximize the utility of cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) by using a noncovalent strategy. We first compared the effectiveness of two potential CPPs, penetratin and its analog PenetraMax, as absorption enhancers for insulin. The combined effect was evaluated under in vivo oral administration conditions. Both D-forms of CPPs were highly effective for increasing the oral absorption of insulin, and D-PenetraMax showed a more rapid onset of absorption enhancement effects compared with those of D-penetratin. However, synergistic absorption enhancement effects after combination treatment were not observed. Next, we tried a theoretical approach to establish optimized oral insulin delivery conditions. A surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based analysis demonstrated that binding between insulin and penetratin (2 mM) might be saturated at 100-500 µM penetratin, while the bound concentration of penetratin could increase in accordance with an increased concentration of mixed insulin. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effectiveness of different insulin doses in the gastric pH-neutralized mice. The results showed that the dissociation of noncovalent complexes of insulin and CPPs at the low gastric pH was prevented in these mice. Our findings clearly suggested that a noncovalent strategy with CPPs represents an effective approach for the L-form of CPP to increase the concentration of CPP-bound insulin to attain greater absorption of insulin, although this approach may not be appropriate for the D-form of CPP. Our findings will contribute to the development of oral dosage forms of insulin for noncovalent strategies involving CPP.

[1]  I. Csóka,et al.  Novel strategies in the oral delivery of antidiabetic peptide drugs – Insulin, GLP 1 and its analogs , 2017, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[2]  Pieter Gillard,et al.  Insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes mellitus: getting better all the time , 2017, Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

[3]  C. Dass,et al.  Oral delivery of insulin for treatment of diabetes: status quo, challenges and opportunities , 2016, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[4]  Jean-Christophe Leroux,et al.  Oral delivery of macromolecular drugs: Where we are after almost 100years of attempts. , 2016, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[5]  Mohamed Rafiullah,et al.  Oral insulin delivery systems using chitosan-based formulation: a review , 2016, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[6]  Nicholas A Peppas,et al.  pH-responsive and enzymatically-responsive hydrogel microparticles for the oral delivery of therapeutic proteins: Effects of protein size, crosslinking density, and hydrogel degradation on protein delivery. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[7]  N. Kamei,et al.  Effect of different intestinal conditions on the intermolecular interaction between insulin and cell-penetrating peptide penetratin and on its contribution to stimulation of permeation through intestinal epithelium. , 2015, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[8]  N. Kamei,et al.  Region-Dependent Role of Cell-Penetrating Peptides in Insulin Absorption Across the Rat Small Intestinal Membrane , 2015, The AAPS Journal.

[9]  M. Karsdal,et al.  Lessons learned from the clinical development of oral peptides , 2015, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[10]  Jørgen Olsen,et al.  In vivo proof of concept of oral insulin delivery based on a co-administration strategy with the cell-penetrating peptide penetratin. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[11]  A. Garber Will the next generation of basal insulins offer clinical advantages? , 2014, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[12]  D. Giugliano,et al.  The development of new basal insulins: is there any clinical advantage with their use in type 2 diabetes? , 2014, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[13]  D. Attwood,et al.  The influence of the degree of esterification on the release characteristics of in situ gelling pectin formulations for oral sustained delivery of paracetamol , 2013, Pharmaceutical development and technology.

[14]  N. Kamei,et al.  Determination of the optimal cell-penetrating peptide sequence for intestinal insulin delivery based on molecular orbital analysis with self-organizing maps. , 2013, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[15]  Anette Müllertz,et al.  Oral delivery of peptides and proteins using lipid-based drug delivery systems , 2012, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[16]  Noriyasu Kamei,et al.  Importance of intermolecular interaction on the improvement of intestinal therapeutic peptide/protein absorption using cell-penetrating peptides. , 2009, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[17]  Noriyasu Kamei,et al.  Usefulness of cell-penetrating peptides to improve intestinal insulin absorption. , 2008, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[18]  N. Kamei,et al.  Permeation characteristics of oligoarginine through intestinal epithelium and its usefulness for intestinal peptide drug delivery. , 2008, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.