On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments

[1]  C. Lumer.  The Epistemological Approach to Argumentation , 2005 .

[2]  Bernard Bosanquet.  Logic, or the Morphology of Knowledge , 2004 .

[3]  D. Hitchcock.  Toulmin’s Warrants , 2003 .

[4]  Chris Reed,et al.  Diagramming, Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions , 2003 .

[5]  John Woods,et al.  What Is Reasoning? What Is an Argument?* , 2001 .

[6]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory , 1996 .

[7]  C. Wright.  TRUTH IN ETHICS , 1995 .

[8]  P. Railton.  SUBJECT‐IVE AND OBJECTIVE , 1995 .

[9]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[10]  D. Walton.  Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning , 1995 .

[11]  James B. Freeman,et al.  Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments , 1991 .

[12]  Douglas Walton,et al.  What is Reasoning? What Is an Argument? , 1990 .

[13]  M. Kienpointner.  Chapter 24. Towards a Typology of Argumentative Schemes , 1987 .

[14]  R. Loui,et al.  Change in View , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Michael A. Gilbert,et al.  How to Win an Argument , 1979 .

[16]  D. O’Keefe.  Two Concepts of Argument. , 1977 .

[17]  D. Mellor,et al.  In Defense of Dispositions , 1974 .

[18]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation , 1971 .

[19]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[20]  Irving M. Copi,et al.  Introduction to Logic , 1962 .