The solution structures of Escherichia coli trp repressor and trp aporepressor at an intermediate resolution.

We have determined the solution structures and examined the dynamics of the Escherichia coli trp repressor (a 25-kDa dimer), with and without the co-repressor L-tryptophan, from NMR data. This is the largest protein structure thus far determined by NMR. To obtain a set of data sufficient for a structure determination it was essential to resort to isotopic spectral editing. Line broadening observed in this molecular mass range precludes for the most part the measurement of coupling constants and stereospecific assignments, with the inevitable result that the attainable resolution of the final structure will be somewhat lower than the resolution reported for smaller proteins and peptides. Nevertheless the general topology of the protein can be deduced from the subsets of NOEs defining the secondary and tertiary structure, providing a basis for further refinement using the full set of NOEs and energy minimization. We report here (a) an intermediate resolution structure that can be deduced from NMR data, covalent, angular and van-der-Waals constraints only, without resort to detailed energy calculations, and (b) the limits of uncertainty within which this structure is valid. An examination of these structures combined with backbone amide exchange data shows that even at this resolution three important conclusions can be drawn: (a) the protein structure changes upon binding tryptophan; (b) the putative DNA binding region is much more flexible than the core of the molecule, with backbone amide proton exchange rates 1000 times faster than in the core; (c) the binding of tryptophan stabilizes the repressor molecule, which is reflected in both the appearance of additional NOEs, and in the slowing of backbone proton exchange rates by factors of 3-10. Sequence-specific 1H-NMR assignments and the secondary structure of the holopressor (L-tryptophan-bound form) have been reported previously [C. H. Arrowsmith, R. Pachter, R. B. Altman, S. B. Iyer & O. Jardetzky (1990) Biochemistry 29, 6332-6341]. Those for the trp aporepressor (L-tryptophan-free form), made using the same methods and conditions as described in the cited paper, are reported here. The secondary structure of the aporepressor was calculated from sequential and medium-range NOEs and is the same as reported for the holorepressor except that helix E is shorter. The tertiary solution structures for both forms of the repressor were calculated from long-range NOE data.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  J H Prestegard,et al.  A dynamic model for the structure of acyl carrier protein in solution. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[2]  Sequence-specific 1H NMR assignments and secondary structure in solution of Escherichia coli trp repressor. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[3]  J. Carey,et al.  Gel retardation at low pH resolves trp repressor-DNA complexes for quantitative study. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  C. Yanofsky,et al.  Formation of heterodimers between wild type and mutant trp aporepressor polypeptides of Escherichia coli , 1988, Proteins.

[5]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Application of phase sensitive two-dimensional correlated spectroscopy (COSY) for measurements of 1H-1H spin-spin coupling constants in proteins. , 1983, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[6]  E. Zuiderweg,et al.  Tertiary structure of human complement component C5a in solution from nuclear magnetic resonance data. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[7]  Pierre Plateau,et al.  Exchangeable proton NMR without base-line distorsion, using new strong-pulse sequences , 1982 .

[8]  S. Opella,et al.  Detection of 1H homonuclear NOE between amide sites in proteins with 1H15N heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy , 1989 .

[9]  Russ B. Altman,et al.  Comparison of the NMR solution structures of cyclosporin A determined by different techniques , 1991 .

[10]  Oleg Jardetzky,et al.  NMR in molecular biology , 1981 .

[11]  O. Jardetzky,et al.  High-Resolution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra of Selectively Deuterated Staphylococcal Nuclease , 1968, Science.

[12]  R B Altman,et al.  New strategies for the determination of macromolecular structure in solution. , 1986, Journal of biochemistry.

[13]  H. Vogel,et al.  Acetylornithinase of Escherichia coli: partial purification and some properties. , 1956, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[14]  Catherine L. Lawson,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of trp repressor , 1985, Nature.

[15]  C. Yanofsky,et al.  Enhanced operator binding by trp superrepressors of Escherichia coli. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  How Trp repressor binds to its operator. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[17]  C. Yanofsky,et al.  trp repressor interactions with the trp aroH and trpR operators. Comparison of repressor binding in vitro and repression in vivo. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  B G Buchanan,et al.  Validation of the first step of the heuristic refinement method for the derivation of solution structures of proteins from NMR data , 1987, Proteins.

[19]  Unusual dynamic features of the trp repressor from Escherichia coli , 1991 .

[20]  O. Jardetzky,et al.  Consequences of magnetization transfer on the determination of solution structures of proteins , 1989 .

[21]  O. Jardetzky,et al.  NMR assignments for the amino-terminal residues of trp repressor and their role in DNA binding. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[22]  C. Yanofsky,et al.  High level production and rapid purification of the E. coli trp repressor. , 1986, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  Ad Bax,et al.  A powerful method of sequential proton resonance assignment in proteins using relayed 15N‐1H multiple quantum coherence spectroscopy , 1989, FEBS letters.

[24]  L. S. Klig,et al.  Analysis of trp repressor-operator interaction by filter binding , 1987, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  R B Altman,et al.  Heuristic refinement method for determination of solution structure of proteins from nuclear magnetic resonance data. , 1989, Methods in enzymology.

[26]  B. Matthews,et al.  The helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[27]  K. Holmes,et al.  Structure of RNA and RNA binding site in tobacco mosaic virus from 4-Å map calculated from X-ray fibre diagrams , 1977, Nature.

[28]  C. Yanofsky,et al.  Nucleotide sequence and expression of Escherichia coli trpR, the structural gene for the trp aporepressor. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  A. Joachimiak,et al.  Crystal structure of trp represser/operator complex at atomic resolution , 1988, Nature.

[30]  C. Yanofsky,et al.  Purification and characterization of trp aporepressor. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  K. Wüthrich.  NMR of proteins and nucleic acids , 1988 .

[32]  D. LeMaster,et al.  Deuterium labelling in NMR structural analysis of larger proteins , 1990, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[33]  O. Jardetzky,et al.  The use of selective deuteration for the sequence specific 1H NMR assignment of larger proteins , 1990 .

[34]  A. Joachimiak,et al.  The crystal structure of trp aporepressor at 1.8 Å shows how binding tryptophan enhances DNA affinity , 1987, Nature.

[35]  Russ B. Altman,et al.  The dependence of a protein solution structure on the quality of the input NMR data. Application of the double-iterated Kalman filter technique to oxytocin , 1990 .

[36]  R. Griffey,et al.  Correlation of proton and nitrogen-15 chemical shifts by multiple quantum NMR☆ , 1983 .

[37]  O. Jardetzky,et al.  Comparison of experimentally determined protein structures by solution of Bloch equations. , 1988, Biochimica et biophysica acta.