Group decision making with linguistic information using a probability-based approach and OWA operators

Traditionally, decision-making problems that manage preferences from different experts follow a common resolution scheme composed of two phases: an aggregation phase that combines the individual preferences to obtain a collective preference value for each alternative; and an exploitation phase that orders the collective preferences according to a given criterion, to select the best alternative/s. In this paper, instead of using an aggregation operator to obtain a collective preference value, a random preference is defined for each alternative in the aggregation phase. To this end, a probability-based interpretation of weights is assumed. Then, the independent assumption imposed on alternatives allows us to work out probabilities of pairwise comparisons of random preferences. In order to obtain a raking order of alternatives for the exploitation phase, we define a choice function based on the ordered weight averaging (OWA) operator with help of the fuzzy majority.

[1]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[2]  Didier Dubois,et al.  A characterization of generalized concordance rules in multicriteria decision making , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[3]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Combining Numerical and Linguistic Information in Group Decision Making , 1998, Inf. Sci..

[4]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[5]  Wolfgang Hauke Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy-MADM) , 1998 .

[6]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-making , 1988 .

[7]  Gloria Bordogna,et al.  A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[8]  José L. Verdegay,et al.  Linguistic decision‐making models , 1992, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[9]  José L. Verdegay,et al.  On aggregation operations of linguistic labels , 1993, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[10]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[11]  Van-Nam Huynh,et al.  A satisfactory-oriented approach to multiexpert decision-making with linguistic assessments , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[12]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[13]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Aggregation operators for linguistic weighted information , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[14]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH TO FUZZY QUANTIFIERS IN NATURAL LANGUAGES , 1983 .

[15]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Non-numeric multi-criteria multi-person decision making , 1993 .

[16]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Applications and Extensions of OWA Aggregations , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[17]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[19]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[20]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Benchmarking in linguistic importance weighted aggregations , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[21]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  An approach to ordinal decision making , 1995, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[22]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[23]  F. Herrera,et al.  A linguistic decision process in group decision making , 1996 .