Quantification of spatially differentiated resource footprints for products and services through a macro-economic and thermodynamic approach.

Although natural resources form the basis of our economy, they are not always used in a sustainable way. To achieve a more sustainable economic growth, resource consumption needs to be measured. Therefore, resource footprint frameworks (RFF) are being developed. To easily provide results, these RFF integrate inventory methodologies, at macrolevel mostly input-output (IO) models, with resource accounting methodologies, of which the Ecological Footprint is probably the best known one. The objective of this work is the development of a new RFF, in which a world IO-model (Exiobase), providing a global perspective, is integrated with the CEENE methodology (Cumulative Exergy Extraction from the Natural Environment), offering a more complete resource range: fossil fuels, metals, minerals, nuclear resources, water resources, land resources, abiotic renewable resources, and atmospheric resources. This RFF, called IO-CEENE, allows one to calculate resource footprints for products or services consumed in different countries as the exergy extracted from nature. The way the framework is constructed makes it possible to show which resources and countries contribute to the total footprint. This was illustrated by a case study, presenting the benefits of the framework's worldwide perspective. Additionally, a software file is provided to easily calculate results.

[1]  J Dewulf,et al.  Cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment (CEENE): a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Arnold Janssens,et al.  An improved calculation of the exergy of natural resources for exergetic life cycle assessment (ELCA). , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Bhavik R. Bakshi,et al.  Industrial and ecological cumulative exergy consumption of the United States via the 1997 input–output benchmark model , 2007 .

[4]  Catherine P. Koshland,et al.  Exergy and industrial ecology. Part 2: A non-dimensional analysis of means to reduce resource depletion , 2001 .

[5]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Mark Goedkoop,et al.  Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards Best Practice , 2002 .

[7]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Thermodynamic resource indicators in LCA: a case study on the titania produced in Panzhihua city, southwest China , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  Stephan Moll,et al.  Towards a global multi-regional environmentally extended input-output database , 2009 .

[9]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  W. Leontief Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States , 1936 .

[11]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Exergy-based accounting for land as a natural resource in life cycle assessment , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  S. Lutter,et al.  Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input-output analysis , 2011 .

[13]  S E Taelman,et al.  The environmental sustainability of microalgae as feed for aquaculture: a life cycle perspective. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[14]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Applying cumulative exergy demand (CExD) indicators to the ecoinvent database , 2006 .

[15]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Generalized Make and Use Framework for Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment , 2010 .

[16]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  A systematic evaluation of the resource consumption of active pharmaceutical ingredient production at three different levels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Pilar Swart,et al.  Abiotic Resource Use , 2015 .

[18]  L. Sokka,et al.  Quantifying the total environmental impacts of an industrial symbiosis - a comparison of process-, hybrid and input-output life cycle assessment. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  B. Boryczko,et al.  Depletion of the non-renewable natural resource reserves in copper, zinc, lead and aluminium production , 2014 .

[20]  Gene Bazan Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[21]  Xu Tang,et al.  Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate change—A review , 2013 .

[22]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Expanding exergy analysis to account for ecosystem products and services. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Kjartan Steen-Olsen,et al.  Carbon, land, and water footprint accounts for the European Union: consumption, production, and displacements through international trade. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Stijn Bruers,et al.  Exergy: its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Steven De Meester,et al.  Resource use analysis of Pangasius aquaculture in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam using Exergetic Life Cycle Assessment , 2013 .

[26]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Methods for Life Cycle Inventory of a product , 2005 .

[27]  Catherine P. Koshland,et al.  Exergy and industrial ecology—Part 1: An exergy-based definition of consumption and a thermodynamic interpretation of ecosystem evolution , 2001 .

[28]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Quantifying the environmental impact of an integrated human/industrial-natural system using life cycle assessment; a case study on a forest and wood processing chain. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  The computational structure of life cycle assessment , 2002 .