The clinical application of potentials evoked from the peripheral auditory system

The auditory nerve is the obligatory pathway between the cochlea and the central nervous system. As the fibers of the mammalian auditory nerve share with each other many response properties when stimulated electrically (Kiang, 1965), it is reasonable to assume that the summed, or gross, electrical response of a fiber ensemble can provide researchers with meaningful information about nerve function. This chapter describes the gross responses of the auditory nerve that can be evoked by stimuli delivered by one or more electrodes implanted within the cochlea. Two manifestations of this potential--the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR)--are introduced and compared. Some implant devices include systems that allow ECAPs to be routinely recorded from electrodes within the cochlea in clinical settings. While such systems have increased the popularity of the ECAP, unique advantages of the EABR are noted. Both potentials have assisted the clinical management of implant recipients and increase our understanding of how the human auditory system responds to electrical stimulation. The goals of this chapter are to review response characteristics of the whole-nerve response, the extent to which they provide information about underlying auditory nerve fiber activity, and limitations to their interpretation. This report will focus on describing and reviewing data collected from various clinical studies and interpreting these results on the basis of theoretical considerations and pertinent results from animal studies. Future research directions, which will likely involve the integration of various dimensions of the electrically evoked response that have been studied in isolation, are also suggested.

[1]  P J Abbas,et al.  Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. , 1998, The American journal of otology.

[2]  J. Wouters,et al.  Asymmetric Pulses in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Pulse Shape, Polarity, and Rate , 2006, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[3]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential , 2005, Hearing Research.

[4]  P J Abbas,et al.  Longitudinal Assessment of Physiological and Psychophysical Measures in Cochlear Implant Users , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[5]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea , 1990, Hearing Research.

[6]  F B Simmons,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[7]  B. Pfingst,et al.  Cochlear Prostheses: Stimulation-Induced Damage , 1983, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[8]  S. B. Brummer,et al.  Electrical Stimulation with Pt Electrodes: AMethod for Determination of "Real" Electrode Areas , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  J. J. Grote,et al.  The Importance of Human Cochlear Anatomy for the Results of Modiolus-Hugging Multichannel Cochlear Implants , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[10]  R J Glynn,et al.  Survival of Spiral Ganglion Cells in Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Implications for Cochlear Implantation , 1989, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[11]  R. Shannon Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[12]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Relationship between Eabr Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Clarion® Speech Processor , 1999, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[13]  C I Berlin,et al.  Binaural interaction components. Their possible origins in guinea pig auditory brainstem response. , 1981, Archives of otolaryngology.

[14]  G. M. Clark,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: The effect of electrode position on neural excitation , 1993, Hearing Research.

[15]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants II. Changes in electrophysiological and psychophysical measures over time , 1995, Hearing Research.

[16]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .

[17]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Electrode Impedance, the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, and Behavioral Measures in Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant Users , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[18]  P. Leake,et al.  Neurotrophic effects of GM1 ganglioside and electrical stimulation on cochlear spiral ganglion neurons in cats deafened as neonates , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  Donald K. Eddington,et al.  Histopathology of Cochlear Implants in Humans , 2001, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[20]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[21]  J. Wouters,et al.  Higher Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers to Positive Electrical Currents , 2008, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[22]  D K Eddington,et al.  SPEECH RECOGNITION IN DEAF SUBJECTS WITH MULTICHANNEL INTRACOCHLEAR ELECTRODES a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Elaine Saunders,et al.  Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[24]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Changes Across Time in Spike Rate and Spike Amplitude of Auditory Nerve Fibers Stimulated by Electric Pulse Trains , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[25]  A. Faulkner,et al.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Multichannel cochlear implants. Channel interactions and processor design. , 1984, Archives of otolaryngology.

[27]  M. Sachs,et al.  Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Channel Interaction in Cochlear Implant Users Evaluated Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[29]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Using Evoked Potentials to Match Interaural Electrode Pairs with Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[30]  Francis Kuk,et al.  Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: Audiologic assessment and predictors of performance , 1988, The Laryngoscope.

[31]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Averaged Electrode Voltage Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[32]  D. Nagel Compound action potential of the cochlear nerve evoked electrically , 1974, Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology.

[33]  F. B. Simmons,et al.  Estimating Eighth Nerve Survival by Electrical Stimulation , 1983, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[34]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: A model approach , 2006, Hearing Research.

[35]  Paul J Abbas,et al.  The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: Refractory properties and strength-duration functions , 1991, Hearing Research.

[37]  L Whitford,et al.  Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. , 1996, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[38]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  The use of long-duration current pulses to assess nerve survival , 1994, Hearing Research.

[39]  P J Abbas,et al.  Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  P J Abbas,et al.  The Relationship Between EAP and EABR Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Nucleus 24 Speech Processor: Data from Adults , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[41]  G M Clark,et al.  Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. , 1998, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[42]  S. Waltzman,et al.  Effects of Chronic Electrical Stimulation on Patients using a Cochlear Prosthesis , 1991, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[43]  Darren M. Whiten,et al.  Histopathology of human cochlear implants: Correlation of psychophysical and anatomical measures , 2005, Hearing Research.

[44]  K. Gyo,et al.  Electrically and acoustically evoked brain stem responses in guinea pig. , 1980, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[45]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  An Improved Method of Reducing Stimulus Artifact in the Electrically Evoked Whole‐Nerve Potential , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[46]  Charles C. Finley,et al.  Models of Neural Responsiveness to Electrical Stimulation , 1990 .

[47]  B. Wilson,et al.  Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses , 2001 .

[48]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures , 1995, Hearing Research.

[49]  Kevin H. Franck,et al.  The electrically evoked whole-nerve action potential: fitting applications for cochlear implant users , 1999 .

[50]  D. Eddington Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  Guido F. Smoorenburg,et al.  Speech Perception in Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant Users with Processor Settings Based on Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Thresholds , 2002, Audiology and Neurotology.

[52]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve , 1987, Hearing Research.

[53]  P J Abbas,et al.  Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[54]  Carolyn J Brown,et al.  An analysis of the impact of auditory-nerve adaptation on behavioral measures of temporal integration in cochlear implant recipients. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  Auditory nerve responses to monophasic and biphasic electric stimuli , 2001, Hearing Research.

[56]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Alternative pulse shapes in electrical hearing , 2008, Hearing Research.

[57]  P J Abbas,et al.  Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Implanted material tolerance studies for a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis. , 1984, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[59]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I. Compound action potential recordings , 1984, Hearing Research.

[60]  J. Fayad,et al.  Multichannel Cochlear Implants: Relation of Histopathology to Performance , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[61]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Synchrony of Neural Activity in Electric Responses Evoked by Transient Acoustic Stimuli , 1958 .

[62]  Jeroen J Briaire,et al.  Field patterns in a 3D tapered spiral model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 2000, Hearing Research.

[63]  R. Hall,et al.  Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response , 1990, Hearing Research.

[64]  J. T. Rubinstein,et al.  The neuronal response to electrical constant-amplitude pulse train stimulation: evoked compound action potential recordings , 2000, Hearing Research.

[65]  S. Cannon,et al.  Evaluation of Eighth Nerve Integrity by the Electrically Evoked Middle Latency Response , 1989, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[66]  R. Cowan,et al.  Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking , 2003, Hearing Research.

[67]  L. Duckert Morphological changes in the normal and neomycin‐perfused guinea pig cochlea following chronic prosthetic implantation. , 1983, The Laryngoscope.

[68]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Temporal integration and multiple looks. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[69]  I. Whitfield Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve , 1966 .

[70]  M F Dorman,et al.  Long-term measures of electrode impedance and auditory thresholds for the Ineraid cochlear implant. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[71]  J. Rubinstein,et al.  Axon termination conditions for electrical stimulation , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[72]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation , 1998, Hearing Research.

[73]  F. Rattay Analysis of Models for External Stimulation of Axons , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[74]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction , 1983, Hearing Research.

[75]  Alexander Joseph Book reviewDischarge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve: Nelson Yuan-Sheng Kiang, with the assistance of Takeshi Watanabe, Eleanor C. Thomas and Louise F. Clark: Research Monograph no. 35. Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, 1965 , 1967 .

[76]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Auditory-nerve first-spike latency and auditory absolute threshold: a computer model. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[77]  Edwin C. Moxon,et al.  Physiological Considerations in Artificial Stimulation of the Inner Ear , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[78]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials , 2004, Hearing Research.