Oculomotor selection underlies feature retention in visual working memory.

Oculomotor selection, spatial task relevance, and visual working memory (WM) are described as three processes highly intertwined and sustained by similar cortical structures. However, because task-relevant locations always constitute potential saccade targets, no study so far has been able to distinguish between oculomotor selection and spatial task relevance. We designed an experiment that allowed us to dissociate in humans the contribution of task relevance, oculomotor selection, and oculomotor execution to the retention of feature representations in WM. We report that task relevance and oculomotor selection lead to dissociable effects on feature WM maintenance. In a first task, in which an object's location was encoded as a saccade target, its feature representations were successfully maintained in WM, whereas they declined at nonsaccade target locations. Likewise, we observed a similar WM benefit at the target of saccades that were prepared but never executed. In a second task, when an object's location was marked as task relevant but constituted a nonsaccade target (a location to avoid), feature representations maintained at that location did not benefit. Combined, our results demonstrate that oculomotor selection is consistently associated with WM, whereas task relevance is not. This provides evidence for an overlapping circuitry serving saccade target selection and feature-based WM that can be dissociated from processes encoding task-relevant locations.

[1]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Inhibition of saccades elicits attentional suppression. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[2]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[3]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Unloading and reloading working memory: attending to one item frees capacity. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Clayton E. Curtis,et al.  Coherence between fMRI time-series distinguishes two spatial working memory networks , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  Jiangang Lu,et al.  Saccades elicit obligatory allocation of visual working memory , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[6]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Bottom-Up Dependent Gating of Frontal Signals in Early Visual Cortex , 2008, Science.

[7]  Clayton E. Curtis,et al.  Maintenance of Spatial and Motor Codes during Oculomotor Delayed Response Tasks , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Frans W Cornelissen,et al.  The Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[9]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Tandra Ghose,et al.  Generalization between canonical and non-canonical views in object recognition. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[11]  D. Melcher,et al.  The Role of Attentional Priority and Saliency in Determining Capacity Limits in Enumeration and Visual Working Memory , 2011, PloS one.

[12]  Junying Yuan,et al.  Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex , 2022 .

[13]  J. Myerson,et al.  The effects of eye and limb movements on working memory , 2001, Memory.

[14]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The selective disruption of spatial working memory by eye movements , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[16]  Stephen J. Gotts,et al.  Cell-Type-Specific Synchronization of Neural Activity in FEF with V4 during Attention , 2012, Neuron.

[17]  J. Myerson,et al.  Selective interference with the maintenance of location information in working memory. , 1996 .

[18]  D. Pearson,et al.  Oculomotor Control and the Maintenance of Spatially and Temporally Distributed Events in Visuo-Spatial Working Memory , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision , 2008, Science.

[20]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. II. Memory responses. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Joel Myerson,et al.  Interference with spatial working memory: An eye movement is more than a shift of attention , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  J. Myerson,et al.  The effects of eye and limb movements on working memory. , 2001, Memory.

[23]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Michael E. Goldberg,et al.  Prefrontal Neurons Coding Suppression of Specific Saccades , 2004, Neuron.

[26]  Tirin Moore,et al.  Persistent Spatial Information in the Frontal Eye Field during Object-Based Short-Term Memory , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[28]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades are triggered by low retinal image slip. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.