Direct Vertebral Rotation: A New Technique of Three-Dimensional Deformity Correction With Segmental Pedicle Screw Fixation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Study Design. A prospective study. Objectives. To introduce a new technique, direct vertebral rotation, and to compare the surgical results of direct vertebral rotation with those of simple rod derotation. Summary of Background Data. Pedicle screw fixation with a simple rod derotation maneuver enables a powerful coronal and sagittal plane correction in scoliosis surgery. However, the ability of achieving rotational correction is still unclear. Methods. Thirty-eight adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with segmental pedicle screw fixation were analyzed. The first group (n = 17) was treated by direct vertebral rotation; the second group (n = 21) was treated by simple rod derotation. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Having similar preoperative curve patterns, both groups were evaluated for the deformity correction, lower instrumented vertebral tilt, and spinal balance. Apical vertebral rotation was evaluated by computed tomography scans. Surgical techniques of direct vertebral rotation were as follows: a precontoured rod was inserted into segmental screws on the concave side in thoracic scoliosis; a simple rod derotation was performed; and then the screws on the juxta-apical vertebrae, both on concave and convex sides, were rotated opposite direction to the rod derotation. Then, all the screws were sequentially tightened. Results. In the direct vertebral rotation group, the average preoperative apical vertebral rotation of 16.7° was corrected to 9.6°, showing 42.5% correction, whereas in the simple rod derotation group, the correction was negligible from 16.1° to 15.7° (2.4%). In the direct vertebral rotation group, the average preoperative thoracic curve of 55° was corrected to 12° (79.6%), and the lumbar curve of 39° was corrected to 7° (80.5%). In the simple rod derotation group, the preoperative thoracic curve of 53° was corrected to 17° (68.9%), and the lumbar curve of 39° was corrected to 16° (62.2%). The average lower instrumented vertebral tilt correction was 80.6% and 66.3% in the directvertebral rotation and the simple rod derotation group, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the coronal curve, lower instrumented vertebral tilt, and rotational correction (P < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). Thoracic kyphosis was improved in both groups. Conclusions. Segmental pedicle screw fixation with “direct vertebral rotation” showed better rotational and coronal correction than “simple rod derotation.”

[1]  J Dubousset,et al.  NEW UNIVERSAL INSTRUMENTATION IN SPINAL SURGERY , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  K Kaneda,et al.  Anterior Correction of Thoracic Scoliosis With Kaneda Anterior Spinal System: A Preliminary Report , 1997, Spine.

[3]  S. Chung,et al.  Comparison of Zielke ventral derotation system and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in the treatment of idiopathic lumbar and thoracolumbar scoliosis. , 1994, Spine.

[4]  S. Delorme,et al.  Long-term three-dimensional changes of the spine after posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 1999, European Spine Journal.

[5]  Jean Dansereau,et al.  Peroperative Three‐Dimensional Correction of Idiopathic Scoliosis With the Cotrel‐Dubousset Procedure , 1995, Spine.

[6]  I A Stokes,et al.  Three-dimensional simulations of the scoliosis derotation maneuver with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  M. Krismer,et al.  Scoliosis Correction by Cotrel‐Dubousset Instrumentation. The Effect of Derotation and Three Dimensional Correction , 1992, Spine.

[8]  Jean Dansereau,et al.  Intraoperative Comparison of Two Instrumentation Techniques for the Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Rod Rotation and Translation , 1999, Spine.

[9]  C. K. Lee,et al.  Segmental Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracic Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1995, Spine.

[10]  K. Bridwell,et al.  Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the basics and the controversies. , 1994, Spine.

[11]  Bruno Watier,et al.  Intraoperative Optoelectronic Analysis of Three‐Dimensional Vertebral Displacement After Cotrel‐Dubousset Rod Rotation: A Preliminary Report , 1997, Spine.

[12]  M. Lagrone,et al.  Derotational Analysis of Cotrel‐Dubousset Instrumentation in Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1991, Spine.

[13]  Munish C. Gupta,et al.  Rotational Changes of the Vertebral Pelvic Axis After Sublaminar Instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1997, Spine.

[14]  R Perdriolle,et al.  Morphology of scoliosis: three-dimensional evolution. , 1987, Orthopedics.

[15]  L. Lenke,et al.  Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  D. Schlenzka,et al.  Dorsal instrumentation for idiopathic adolescent thoracic scoliosis: rod rotation versus translation , 1999, European Spine Journal.

[17]  S Aaro,et al.  Estimation of Vertebral Rotation and the Spinal and Rib Cage Deformity in Scoliosis by Computer Tomography , 1981, Spine.

[18]  B. S. Richards,et al.  Anterior correction of idiopathic scoliosis using TSRH instrumentation. , 1993, Spine.