Emphasizing social features in information portals: Effects on new member engagement

Many information portals are adding social features with hopes of enhancing the overall user experience. Invitations to join and welcome pages that highlight these social features are expected to encourage use and participation. While this approach is widespread and seems plausible, the effect of providing and highlighting social features remains to be tested. We studied the effects of emphasizing social features on users' response to invitations, their decisions to join, their willingness to provide profile information, and their engagement with the portal's social features. The results of a quasi-experiment found no significant effect of social emphasis in invitations on receivers' responsiveness. However, users receiving invitations highlighting social benefits were less likely to join the portal and provide profile information. Social emphasis in the initial welcome page for the site also was found to have a significant effect on whether individuals joined the portal, how much profile information they provided and shared, and how much they engaged with social features on the site. Unexpectedly, users who were welcomed in a social manner were less likely to join and provided less profile information; they also were less likely to engage with social features of the portal. This suggests that even in online contexts where social activity is an increasingly common feature, highlighting the presence of social features may not always be the optimal presentation strategy.

[1]  Daniel R. Horne,et al.  The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors , 2007 .

[2]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[3]  Tim Mansfield,et al.  Sharing Social Recommendations: Towards a Social Portal , 2002, DCW.

[4]  J. Levine,et al.  Socialization in Small Groups: Temporal Changes in Individual-Group Relations1 , 1982 .

[5]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Motivations for social networking at work , 2008, CSCW.

[6]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Overcoming Online Information Privacy Concerns: An Information-Processing Theory Approach , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Community Effort in Online Groups: Who Does the Work and Why? , 2007 .

[8]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[9]  Enrico Francese Report OCLC 2009: Online Catalogs: what Users and Librarians want , 2009 .

[10]  Rebecca Walker Reczek,et al.  Seeing Ourselves in Others: Reviewer Ambiguity, Egocentric Anchoring, and Persuasion , 2011 .

[11]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities , 2006, CHI.

[12]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[13]  Paul Miller Web 2.0: Building the New Library , 2005 .

[14]  Karen S Calhoun,et al.  Online catalogs : what users and librarians want , 2009 .

[15]  Clement Chau,et al.  YouTube as a participatory culture. , 2010, New directions for youth development.

[16]  David Gefen,et al.  Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin,et al.  Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[18]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Socialization tactics in wikipedia and their effects , 2010, CSCW '10.

[19]  John M. Levine,et al.  Sources of Optimism among Prospective Group Members , 1991 .

[20]  Heiko Spallek,et al.  Supporting Emerging Disciplines with e-Communities: Needs and Benefits , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[21]  Robert M. Fano Computer-Mediated Communication , 1985, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.