Academic team formation as evolving hypergraphs

This paper quantitatively explores the social and socio-semantic patterns of constitution of academic collaboration teams. To this end, we broadly underline two critical features of social networks of knowledge-based collaboration: first, they essentially consist of group-level interactions which call for team-centered approaches. Formally, this induces the use of hypergraphs and n-adic interactions, rather than traditional dyadic frameworks of interaction such as graphs, binding only pairs of agents. Second, we advocate the joint consideration of structural and semantic features, as collaborations are allegedly constrained by both of them. Considering these provisions, we propose a framework which principally enables us to empirically test a series of hypotheses related to academic team formation patterns. In particular, we exhibit and characterize the influence of an implicit group structure driving recurrent team formation processes. On the whole, innovative production does not appear to be correlated with more original teams, while a polarization appears between groups composed of experts only or non-experts only, altogether corresponding to collectives with a high rate of repeated interactions.

[1]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  DYNAMIC SOCIAL NETWORK MODELING AND ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[2]  B. Kogut,et al.  Open-source Software Development and Distributed Innovation , 2001 .

[3]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Self-organization of collaboration networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[5]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science , 2008, Science.

[6]  P. Murray COLLABORATION AND CREATIVITY , 2004 .

[7]  D. Chubin State of the Field The Conceptualization of Scientific Specialties , 1976 .

[8]  G. Davis,et al.  Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  M. Newman,et al.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Martin Ruef,et al.  A structural event approach to the analysis of group composition , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[11]  P. Haas Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination , 1992, International Organization.

[12]  J. Moody The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 , 2004 .

[13]  M. Callon Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[14]  I. Karsai,et al.  Comb Building in Social Wasps: Self-organization and Stigmergic Script , 1993 .

[15]  Robert D. Tollison,et al.  Intellectual Collaboration , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Georg Simmel,et al.  The Persistence of Social Groups , 1898, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  S. Shapin Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts , 1981, Medical History.

[18]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[20]  Mattias Smångs,et al.  The Nature of the Business Group: A Social Network Perspective , 2006 .

[21]  Camille Roth,et al.  Co-evolution in Epistemic Networks: Reconstructing Social Complex Systems - A Summary Presentation , 2005 .

[22]  Robert R. Faulkner,et al.  Short-Term Projects and Emergent Careers: Evidence from Hollywood , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  P. Lari Do STRUCTURAL EFFECTS OF EC RT & D PROGRAMMES , 1995 .

[24]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Catching up with big fish in the big pond? Multi-level network analysis through linked design , 2008, Soc. Networks.

[25]  W. Powell,et al.  SOCIAL COHESION , 2005 .

[26]  L. Freeman Finding Social Groups: A Meta-Analysis of the Southern Women Data , 2003 .

[27]  Robin Cowan,et al.  The Joint Dynamics of Networks and Knowledge , 2003 .

[28]  A. Lott,et al.  Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  E. Leahey,et al.  Research Specialization and Collaboration Patterns in Sociology , 2008 .

[30]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[31]  Philippe Larédo,et al.  The networks promoted by the framework programme and the questions they raise about its formulation and implementation , 1998 .

[32]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[33]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  Visualizing the Signatures of Social Roles in Online Discussion Groups , 2007, J. Soc. Struct..

[34]  John Gerard Ruggie,et al.  International responses to technology: Concepts and trends , 1975, International Organization.

[35]  Marko A. Rodriguez,et al.  On the relationship between the structural and socioacademic communities of a coauthorship network , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[36]  Camille Roth,et al.  Social and semantic coevolution in knowledge networks , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[37]  R. Breiger The Duality of Persons and Groups , 1974 .

[38]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[39]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: self-organized structuring to map neural network research , 1998 .

[40]  N. Mullins The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology , 1972 .

[41]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[42]  Stephen M. Ritchie Studying research collaborations , 2007 .

[43]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia , 2005, GROUP.

[44]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[45]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[46]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[47]  K. Bollen,et al.  Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination , 1990 .

[48]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts , 1983 .

[49]  Philippe Larédo Structural effects of EC RT & D programmes , 2005, Scientometrics.

[50]  Lynn Smith-Lovin,et al.  Cohesion and membership duration: Linking groups, relations and individuals in an ecology of affiliation , 2002 .

[51]  D. Beaver Collaboration and teamwork in physics , 1986 .

[52]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Monitoring Scientific Developments from a Dynamic Perspective: Self-Organized Structuring to Map Neural Network Research , 1998, Journal of the American Society for Information Science.

[53]  M. Newman Erratum: Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality (Physical Review e (2001) 64 (016132)) , 2006 .

[54]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[55]  M. Callon,et al.  Некоторые элементы социологии перевода: приручение морских гребешков и рыболовов бухты Сен-Бриё , 2017 .

[56]  Michel Callon,et al.  Is Science a Public Good? Fifth Mullins Lecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 23 March 1993 , 1994 .

[57]  D. Crane SOCIAL STRUCTURE IN A GROUP OF SCIENTISTS: A TEST OF THE “INVISIBLE COLLEGE” HYPOTHESIS* , 1977 .

[58]  Kara L. Hall,et al.  The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[59]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology , 1986 .

[60]  Julien Levrel,et al.  Wikipedia, un dispositif médiatique de publics participants , 2006 .

[61]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999 , 2004 .

[62]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Mapping the dynamics of science and technology , 1988, Scientometrics.

[63]  Philippa Pattison,et al.  Dynamic Social Network Modelling and Analysis , 2003 .

[64]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 2005, Scientometrics.

[65]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 1978, Scientometrics.

[66]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[67]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[68]  Georg Simmel,et al.  The Persistence of Social Groups. II , 1898, American Journal of Sociology.