Optimal piezo-actuator locations/lengths and applied voltage for shape control of beams

Shape control of beams under general loading conditions is implemented using piezoceramic actuators to provide the control forces. The objective of the shape-control is to minimize the maximum deflection of the beam to obtain a min-max deflection configuration with respect to loading and piezo-actuators. In practice, the loading on a beam is a variable quantity with respect to its magnitude, and this aspect can be handled easily by optimizing the magnitude of the applied voltage to achieve the min-max deflection. This property of the smart materials technology overcomes the problem of one-off conventional optimal designs which become suboptimal when the loading magnitude changes. In addition to the magnitude of the applied voltage, the optimal values for the locations and the lengths of the piezo-actuators are determined to achieve the min-max deflection. Due to the complexity of the governing equations involving finite length piezo patches, the numerical results are obtained by the finite-difference method. The analysis of the problem shows the effect of the actuator locations, lengths and the applied voltage on the maximum deflection. The optimal values for the actuator locations and the voltage are determined as functions of the load locations and load magnitudes, respectively. The effect of the actuator length on the min-max deflection is investigated and it is observed that the optimal length depends on the applied voltage. Finally, it is shown that using multiple actuators are more effective than a single actuator in the cases of complicated loading.

[1]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  The selection of mechanical actuators based on performance indices , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[2]  A. L. Kalamkarov,et al.  Optimal Design of Intelligent Composite Structures , 1997 .

[3]  Ron Barrett,et al.  Active plate and wing research using EDAP elements , 1992 .

[4]  Robert L. Clark,et al.  A model reference approach for implementing active structural acoustic control. , 1991 .

[5]  A. D. Drozdov,et al.  Intelligent composite structures: General theory and applications , 1996 .

[6]  László P. Kollár,et al.  Shape Control of Composite Plates and Shells with Embedded Actuators. I. Voltages Specified , 1994 .

[7]  Singiresu S. Rao,et al.  Piezoelectricity and Its Use in Disturbance Sensing and Control of Flexible Structures: A Survey , 1994 .

[8]  László P. Kollár,et al.  Shape Control of Composite Plates and Shells with Embedded Actuators. II. Desired Shape Specified , 1994 .

[9]  Moshe Eisenberger,et al.  Shape control of non-symmetric piezolaminated composite beams , 1997 .

[10]  Chien-Chang Lin,et al.  Vibration and sound radiation controls of beams using layered modal sensors and actuators , 1998 .

[11]  K. Chandrashekhara,et al.  Adaptive Shape Control of Composite Beams with Piezoelectric Actuators , 1997 .

[12]  K. Chandrashekhara,et al.  Modeling and Shape Control of Composite Beams with Embedded Piezoelectric Actuators , 1996 .

[13]  C. Fuller,et al.  Experiments on active control of structurally radiated sound using multiple piezoceramic actuators , 1990 .

[14]  Ephrahim Garcia,et al.  Optimal placement and sizing of paired piezoactuators in beams and plates , 1994 .

[15]  Lin Chien-Chang,et al.  Finite element analysis on deflection control of plates with piezoelectric actuators , 1996 .