Comparative safety and efficacy of molecular-targeted drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and their combinations in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: findings from advances in landmark trials.

Background: Several recent phase 3 trials have reported manageable safety profiles and promising antitumor activities of molecular-targeted drugs (MTDs; sorafenib, lenvatinib), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs; nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and their combinations in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (AHCC); however, head-to-head comparisons among these regimens are lacking. Methods: We aimed to comprehensively review and compare the efficacy and safety of different MTDs, ICIs, HAIC and their combinations in AHCC. Adverse events (AEs), disease control rates (DCRs), objective response rates (ORRs), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed. Results: The pooled incidence rates of grade 1-5/3-5 AEs were 98.0%/48.6%, 98.3%/57.4%, 91.4%/22.0%, 96.4%/54.6%, 98.2%/61.1%, 86.3%/34.1%, 88.9%/9.4%, and 95.2%/53.2% for sorafenib, lenvatinib, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, HAIC-cisplatin plus sorafenib, HAIC-oxaliplatin, and HAIC-oxaliplatin plus sorafenib, respectively, which suggested that nivolumab exhibited optimal safety regarding grade 1-5 AEs, whereas HAIC-oxaliplatin monotherapy ranked lowest regarding grade 3-5 AEs. According to RECIST1.1, lenvatinib (72.8%), atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (73.6%), HAIC-oxaliplatin (78.8%) and HAIC-oxaliplatin plus sorafenib (75.2%) showed higher DCRs than sorafenib (57.3%), nivolumab (33.9%), and pembrolizumab (62.3%), whereas only HAIC-oxaliplatin-based treatments demonstrated a higher ORR than the others. Pooled OS and PFS analysis favored the combination regimens other than sorafenib along. Conclusions: Here, we present preliminary evidence for the comparative safety and efficacy of existing MTDs, ICIs, HAIC and their combinations in AHCC, which indicated that HAIC-oxaliplatin monotherapy has acceptable toxicity and efficacy and could be the cornerstone for future combination of systemic treatments in AHCC. Our findings might provide insight into the future design of multidisciplinary treatments in AHCC.

[1]  Yulei N. Wang,et al.  Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Bruno Sangro,et al.  Milestones in the pathogenesis and management of primary liver cancer. , 2020, Journal of hepatology.

[3]  M. Kudo,et al.  Pembrolizumab As Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  M. Kudo,et al.  CheckMate 459: A randomized, multi-center phase III study of nivolumab (NIVO) vs sorafenib (SOR) as first-line (1L) treatment in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) , 2019, Annals of Oncology.

[5]  J. Xu,et al.  Vessels That Encapsulate Tumor Clusters (VETC) Pattern Is a Predictor of Sorafenib Benefit in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2019, Hepatology.

[6]  Zhongguo Zhou,et al.  Sorafenib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin vs Sorafenib Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Invasion: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2019, JAMA oncology.

[7]  Y. Bang,et al.  Pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: results from the phase II nonrandomized KEYNOTE-059 study , 2019, Gastric Cancer.

[8]  M. Kudo Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Latest Advances , 2018, Cancers.

[9]  M. Kudo,et al.  Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  Y. Kong,et al.  Hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin vs. sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2018, Journal of hepatology.

[11]  M. Kudo,et al.  A phase 1b trial of lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEM) in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). , 2018 .

[12]  Y. Imai,et al.  Sorafenib plus low-dose cisplatin and fluorouracil hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (SILIUS): a randomised, open label, phase 3 trial. , 2018, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology.

[13]  M. Kudo,et al.  Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial , 2018, The Lancet.

[14]  M. Kudo,et al.  Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[15]  M. Rebelatto,et al.  Phase I/II study of durvalumab and tremelimumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Phase I safety and efficacy analyses. , 2017 .

[16]  S. Friedman,et al.  Liver Cancer Cell of Origin, Molecular Class, and Effects on Patient Prognosis. , 2017, Gastroenterology.

[17]  Masatoshi Kudo,et al.  Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[18]  S. Sleijfer,et al.  PD-L1, Galectin-9 and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with survival in hepatocellular carcinoma , 2017, Oncoimmunology.

[19]  J. Chung,et al.  Overexpression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2016, Cancer research and treatment : official journal of Korean Cancer Association.

[20]  L. Bolondi,et al.  Prognostic significance of adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib , 2016, Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology.

[21]  M. Socinski,et al.  The Clinical Viewpoint: Definitions, Limitations of RECIST, Practical Considerations of Measurement , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[22]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. , 2003, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[23]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2019 , 2019, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[24]  Michael R Hamblin,et al.  CA : A Cancer Journal for Clinicians , 2011 .

[25]  Yoon-Koo Kang,et al.  Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.