Comparing student success between developmental math courses offered online, blended, and face-to-face.

Community colleges are increasing their enrollment faster than four-year universities and have also had the highest growth rate in online learning enrollments in higher education. This increase in community college enrollment and specifically in online and developmental courses, leads to a need for research with this population; sadly, very little research focuses on online students in community colleges. The purpose of this paper is to present a research study which compared student success in a Developmental Math course offered in three different learning environments (online, blended, and face-to-face). Using quantitative instruments, data from 167 participants was collected including, demographic information, unit test grades and standardized Intermediate Algebra Competency Exam scores. Results of a one way ANOVA showed that there were significant differences between learning environments with the students in the blended courses having the least success. Additional analysis was done to address issues of attrition since attrition rates are high for community college students and online students. Data analysis with the attrition adjusted sample showed that the face-to-face students performed most poorly. The findings of this study contradict the current research findings of no significant difference in success based on learning environment.

[1]  Oscar S. Cerna,et al.  Turning the Tide: Five Years of Achieving the Dream in Community Colleges , 2011 .

[2]  T. Williams Participation in education , 1987 .

[3]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning. , 2007 .

[4]  Nanci A. Scheetz,et al.  Online versus Traditional Classroom Delivery of a Course in Manual Communication , 2004 .

[5]  James R. Lindner,et al.  Does It Matter? Analyzing the Results of Three Different Learning Delivery Methods. , 2005 .

[6]  Mary Jane Feldman,et al.  Factors associated with one-year retention in a community college , 1993 .

[7]  Savilla Banister,et al.  Face-to-Face versus Online Coursework: A Comparison of Costs and Learning Outcomes , 2007 .

[8]  Carol A. Zavarella,et al.  Instructional Delivery in Developmental Mathematics: Impact on Retention. , 2009 .

[9]  Sherri Hodge-Hardin Interactive Television vs. a Traditional Classroom Setting: A Comparison of Student Math Achievement. , 1997 .

[10]  P. Reed,et al.  Evaluating Web-supported Learning Versus Lecture-based Teaching: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives , 2005 .

[11]  Lorraine Angelino,et al.  Strategies to Engage Online Students and Reduce Attrition Rates. , 2007 .

[12]  Laura I. Rendón Facilitating Retention and Transfer for First Generation Students in Community Colleges. , 1995 .

[13]  Robyn C. Walker,et al.  A Comparison of Traditional and Technology-Assisted Instructional Methods in the Business Communication Classroom , 2004 .

[14]  P. Murtaugh,et al.  PREDICTING THE RETENTION OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS , 1999 .

[15]  Nikki Edgecombe Accelerating the Academic Achievement of Students Referred to Developmental Education. CCRC Working Paper No. 30. , 2011 .

[16]  DROPOUT AND STOPOUT PATTERNS AMONG DEVELOPMENTAL EDUCATION STUDENTS IN TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGES , 2001 .

[17]  Pansy W Aycaster FACTORS IMPACTING SUCCESS IN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEVELOPMENTAL MATHEMATICS COURSES AND SUBSEQUENT COURSES , 2001 .

[18]  Jeffrey D. Kromrey,et al.  A comparison of lecture, cooperative learning and programmed instruction at the college level , 1995 .

[19]  Katherine T. Boswell,et al.  State Policies on Community College Remedial Education: Findings from a National Survey. , 2002 .

[20]  J. Mohammadi Exploring Retention and Attrition in a Two-Year Public Community College. , 1994 .

[21]  Charlotte L. Neuhauser Learning Style and Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Instruction , 2002 .