Does Veiling Glare in the Human Eye Hinder Detection in High-Dynamic-Range Displays?

Ever since Stiles and Holladay (1929), veiling glare (VG) in the human visual system has been known to hinder the visibility of subtle targets. In this work, we quantitatively study how veiling glare affects contrast detection tasks using a dual-layer high-dynamic-range (HDR) display and empirically model the VG effect on thresholds. We used a binary decision for the presence of a Gaussian target in the center of the display on white noise backgrounds. The VG source was realized using a ring pattern with varying parameters. Detection thresholds were estimated using a double-random staircase technique including signal absent trials. In addition, divergence of the subject's fixation from the target in the center was tracked in real-time and used to provide auditory feedback to minimize adaptation effects. Our results are interpreted in terms of illuminance and angular distance between source and target. Sensitivity was lower for smaller angular distances and for larger source intensities. Results from three subjects were used to formulate a bivariate model of VG effect for contrast thresholds similar to Stiles and Holladay. The model can be used to suggest optimal, content-dependent, HDR presentation modes for medical images.

[1]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Spatial Modulation Transfer in the Human Eye , 1967 .

[2]  J. J. Vos On the cause of disability glare and its dependence on glare angle, age and ocular pigmentation , 2003, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[3]  T. Cornsweet,et al.  Relation of increment thresholds to brightness and luminance. , 1965, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[4]  M A García-Pérez,et al.  Yes-No Staircases with Fixed Step Sizes: Psychometric Properties and Optimal Setup , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  Yan Tan,et al.  Comparing Signal Detection Between Novel High-Luminance HDR and Standard Medical LCD Displays , 2008, Journal of Display Technology.

[6]  José F Barraza,et al.  Effect of glare on simple reaction time. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  Michael J. Flynn,et al.  Image quality degradation by light scattering in display devices , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  J. J. Vos Reflections on glare , 2003 .

[9]  L. L. Holladay The Fundamentals of Glare and Visibility , 1926 .

[10]  T. Cornsweet,et al.  The staircrase-method in psychophysics. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  Aldo Badano,et al.  A gaze-contingent high-dynamic range display for medical imaging applications , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Physically-based glare effects for digital images , 1995, SIGGRAPH.

[13]  G. Ramponi,et al.  Minimum-Error Splitting Algorithm for a Dual Layer LCD Display—Part I: Background and Theory , 2008, Journal of Display Technology.

[14]  B. Julesz,et al.  Spatial-frequency masking in vision: critical bands and spread of masking. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[15]  W. Stiles The scattering theory of the effect of glare on the brightness difference threshold , 1929 .

[16]  Ramesh Raskar,et al.  Glare aware photography: 4D ray sampling for reducing glare effects of camera lenses , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.

[17]  J. Vos Disability Glare A State of The Art Report , 1984 .

[18]  R L Watson A modified formula for calculating the disability glare effect from street lighting lanterns , 1970 .