Effects of attention on motion repulsion

Motion repulsion involves interaction between two directions of motion. Since attention is known to bias interactions among different stimuli, we investigated the effect of attentional tasks on motion repulsion. We used two overlapping sets of random dots moving in different directions. When subjects had to detect a small speed-change or luminance change for dots along one direction, the repulsive influence from the other direction was significantly reduced compared with the control case without attentional tasks. However, when the speed-change could occur to either direction such that subjects had to attend both directions to detect the change, motion repulsion was not different from the control. A further experiment showed that decreasing the difficulty of the attentional task resulted in the disappearance of the attentional effect in the case of attention to one direction. Finally, over a wide range of contrasts for the unattended direction, attention reduced repulsion measured with the attended direction. These results are consistent with the physiological finding that strong attention to one direction of motion reduces inhibitory effects from the other direction.

[1]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[2]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Graded effects of spatial and featural attention on human area MT and associated motion processing areas. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[4]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[5]  M W von Grünau,et al.  Attentional selection of motion states. , 1998, Spatial vision.

[6]  Ning Qian,et al.  Motion rivalry impairs motion repulsion , 2001, Vision Research.

[7]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  J. Raymond.  Attentional modulation of visual motion perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Effects of Attention on the Processing of Motion in Macaque Middle Temporal and Medial Superior Temporal Visual Cortical Areas , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural strength of visual attention gauged by motion adaptation , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Treue.  Neural correlates of attention in primate visual cortex , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. , 1979, Science.

[14]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[15]  M. Valdés-Sosa,et al.  Transparent motion and object-based attention , 1998, Cognition.

[16]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion , 1995, Vision Research.

[17]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[18]  A. Chaudhuri.  Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention , 1990, Nature.

[19]  H R Wilson,et al.  A model for motion coherence and transparency , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[20]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Reference Repulsion When Judging the Direction of Visual Motion , 1998, Perception.

[21]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Revisiting motion repulsion: evidence for a general phenomenon? , 1999, Vision Research.

[22]  C D Frith,et al.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. , 1997, Science.

[23]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  R. Blake,et al.  Direction repulsion in motion transparency , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[25]  H. J. Rauder.  Reference repulision when judging the direction of visual motion , 1998 .

[26]  ● Pytorch,et al.  Attention! , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.