Long-term memory traces for familiar spoken words in tonal languages as revealed by the Mismatch Negativity

Sittiprapaporn, W., Chindaduangratn, C. and Kotchabhakdi, N. Long-term memory traces for familiar spoken words in tonal languages as revealed by the Mismatch negativity Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 2004, 26(6) : 779-786 Mismatch negativity (MMN), a primary response to an acoustic change and an index of sensory memory, was used to investigate the processing of the discrimination between familiar and unfamiliar Consonant-Vowel (CV) speech contrasts. The MMN was elicited by rare familiar words presented among repetitive unfamiliar words. Phonetic and phonological contrasts were identical in all conditions. MMN elicited by the familiar word deviant was larger than that elicited by the unfamiliar word deviant. The presence of syllable contrast did significantly alter the word-elicited MMN in amplitude and scalp voltage field distribution. Thus, our results indicate the existence of word-related MMN enhancement largely independent of the word status of the standard stimulus. This enhancement may reflect the presence of a longterm memory trace for familiar spoken words in tonal languages.

[1]  S. Palva,et al.  Discrimination of Speech and of Complex Nonspeech Sounds of Different Temporal Structure in the Left and Right Cerebral Hemispheres , 2000, NeuroImage.

[2]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  T. Picton,et al.  Mismatch Negativity: Different Water in the Same River , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[4]  P. Tallal,et al.  Neurobiology of speech perception. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  R Näätänen,et al.  Phoneme representations of the human brain as reflected by event-related potentials. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[6]  K. Alho.  Cerebral Generators of Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and Its Magnetic Counterpart (MMNm) Elicited by Sound Changes , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[7]  T. Carrell,et al.  Mismatch negativity event-related potential elicited by speech stimuli. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[8]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Preattentive voice discrimination by the human brain as indexed by the mismatch negativity , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  R. Näätänen.  The Mismatch Negativity: A Powerful Tool for Cognitive Neuroscience , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[10]  I. Winkler,et al.  The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  B. Milner,et al.  A Cross-Linguistic PET Study of Tone Perception in Mandarin Chinese and English Speakers , 2001, NeuroImage.

[12]  A specialization for speech perception revised , 1985 .

[13]  O Bertrand,et al.  Analysis of speech sounds is left-hemisphere predominant at 100-150ms after sound onset. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[14]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Background acoustic noise and the hemispheric lateralization of speech processing in the human brain: magnetic mismatch negativity study , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  Juha Virtanen,et al.  Hemispheric lateralization in preattentive processing of speech sounds , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Speed and cerebral correlates of syllable discrimination in infants , 1994, Nature.

[17]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Mismatch negativity--the measure for central sound representation accuracy. , 1997, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[18]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Speech Perception , 2004, Annual Review of Psychology.

[19]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Memory Traces for Words as Revealed by the Mismatch Negativity , 2001, NeuroImage.

[20]  J. Gandour,et al.  Pitch processing in the human brain is influenced by language experience , 1998, Neuroreport.

[21]  F. Pulvermüller.  Brain reflections of words and their meaning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Joanne L. Miller,et al.  Speech Perception , 1990, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[23]  I. Winkler,et al.  Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP). , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  R Näätänen,et al.  Mismatch negativity--a unique measure of sensory processing in audition. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[25]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses , 1997, Nature.

[26]  P. Tallal,et al.  Rate of acoustic change may underlie hemispheric specialization for speech perception , 1980, Science.

[27]  R. Näätänen.  The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Mari Tervaniemi,et al.  Preattentive Processing of Lexical Tone Perception by the Human Brain as Indexed by the Mismatch Negativity Paradigm , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[29]  G. Dehaene-Lambertz.  Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults , 1997, Neuroreport.

[30]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence of memory traces for words in the human brain , 2002, Neuroreport.

[31]  J. Sidtis,et al.  The identification of affective-prosodic stimuli by left- and right-hemisphere-damaged subjects: all errors are not created equal. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.