Structured Outpatient Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion Is Safe and Cost-Saving

♦ Background: Data about outcomes and costs for peritoneal catheter insertion on an outpatient basis are scarce. ♦ Methods: Using patient files, all peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertions performed between 2004 and 2009 in a single-center tertiary care institution for adult patients were located. Patient demographics, complications, hospitalizations, survival, and treatment modality changes were recorded. Procedure-related expenses were valued as actual production costs. ♦ Results: During the study period, 106 PD catheters were inserted. In 46 cases, the patients were admitted electively for catheter insertion; 19 catheters were placed during admission for other medical reasons; and 41 catheters were placed on an outpatient basis. Among the study patients (54.7 ± 16.0 years of age), 45% were diabetic. Early (<30 days) catheter-related complications occurred in 22% of patients. The incidences of technique failure and any complication within 90 days were 10% and 38% respectively. The occurrence of complications was not statistically significantly different for outpatients and electively admitted patients. Average costs for catheter insertion were higher in electively hospitalized patients than in outpatients (€2320 ± €960 vs €1346 ± €208, p < 0.000). ♦ Conclusions: Compared with an inpatient procedure, outpatient insertion of a PD catheter results in similar outcomes at a lower cost.

[1]  K. Simpson,et al.  Peritoneal Dialysis–Associated Peritonitis Rates and Outcomes in a National Cohort Are Not Improving in the Post-Millennium (2000 – 2007) , 2011, Peritoneal Dialysis International.

[2]  S. Tobe,et al.  A CHANGE TO RADIOLOGICAL PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CATHETER INSERTION: THREE-MONTH OUTCOMES , 2010, Peritoneal Dialysis International.

[3]  S. Han,et al.  Mortality and technique failure in peritoneal dialysis patients using advanced peritoneal dialysis solutions. , 2009, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[4]  F. Dekker,et al.  Similar survival on automated peritoneal dialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in a large prospective cohort. , 2009, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[5]  N. Powe,et al.  Association of Peritoneal Dialysis Clinic Size with Clinical Outcomes , 2009, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[6]  F. Finkelstein,et al.  Technique Failure and Center Size in a Large Cohort of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients in a Defined Geographic Area , 2009, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[7]  Z. Twardowski,et al.  Current trends in the use of peritoneal dialysis catheters. , 2006, Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis.

[8]  Harri Sintonen,et al.  Cost analysis of renal replacement therapies in Finland. , 2003, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[9]  A. Fine,et al.  Hospitalization is not Necessary for Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion , 2002, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[10]  B. Piraino,et al.  Placement of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters on an Outpatient Basis , 2002, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[11]  V. Pichette,et al.  Dialysate Leaks in Peritoneal Dialysis , 2001, Seminars in dialysis.

[12]  M. Farr,et al.  Randomized Prospective Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion , 1999, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[13]  A. Tzamaloukas,et al.  Early and late peritoneal dialysate leaks in patients on CAPD. , 1990, Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis.