An evaluation of the applicability of the NGA models to ground-motion prediction in the Euro-Mediterranean region

The first phase of the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) project has now finished, resulting in the publication of five new sets of empirical ground-motion models for PGA, PGV and response spectral ordinates. These models mark a significant advancement in the state-of-the-art in empirical ground-motion modelling and include many effects that are not accounted for in existing European equations. Under the assumption that the Euro-Mediterranean database from which the European relationships are derived is unlikely to drastically change in the near future, a prudent question to ask is: can the NGA models be applied in Europe? In order to answer this question, the NGA model of Boore and Atkinson (PEER Report 2007/01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 234 pp., 2007), which is shown to be representative of the NGA models as a suite, is compared with the dataset used for the development of the most recent European empirical ground-motion models for response spectral ordinates and peak ground velocity. The comparisons are made using analyses of model residuals and the likelihood approach of Scherbaum et al. (Bull Seism Soc Am 94(6):2164–2185, 2004). The analyses indicate that for most engineering applications, and particularly for displacement-based approaches to seismic design, the NGA models may confidently be applied within Europe. Furthermore, it is recommended that they be used in conjunction with existing European models to provide constraint on finite-fault effects and non-linear site response within logic-tree frameworks. The findings also point to the potential benefits of merging the NGA and European datasets.

[1]  R. Youngs,et al.  Attenuation Relationships for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on California Strong Motion Data , 1997 .

[2]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 1997 .

[3]  Stéphane Drouet,et al.  Selection and ranking of ground motion models for seismic hazard analysis in the Pyrenees , 2007 .

[4]  Dario Slejko,et al.  Empirical Ground-Motion Attenuation Relations for the Eastern Alps in the Magnitude Range 2.5–6.3 , 2005 .

[5]  J. Bommer,et al.  PREDICTION OF HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA IN EUROPE , 1996 .

[6]  J. Bommer,et al.  Prediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East , 2007 .

[7]  N. A. Abrahamson,et al.  A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[8]  F. Sabetta,et al.  Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Magnitude-dependent variance of peak ground acceleration , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[10]  J. Bommer,et al.  Style-of-Faulting in Ground-Motion Prediction Equations , 2003 .

[11]  Izzat M. Idriss EMPIRICAL MODEL FOR ESTIMATING THE AVERAGE HORIZONTAL VALUES OF PSEUDO-ABSOLUTE SPECTRAL ACCELERATIONS GENERATED BY CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES , 2007 .

[12]  J. Bommer,et al.  Influence of long‐period filter cut‐off on elastic spectral displacements , 2006 .

[13]  Philippe Volant,et al.  ATTENUATION RELATION FOR WEST EURASIA DETERMINED WITH RECENT NEAR-FAULT RECORDS FROM CALIFORNIA, JAPAN AND TURKEY , 2003 .

[14]  J. Douglas,et al.  Equations for the Estimation of Strong Ground Motions from Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Using Data from Europe and the Middle East: Horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration and Spectral Acceleration , 2005 .

[15]  V. Montaldo,et al.  Analysis of strong ground motions to evaluate regional attenuation relationships , 2002 .

[16]  Lucia Luzi,et al.  Ground-Motion Predictions from Empirical Attenuation Relationships versus Recorded Data: The Case of the 1997–1998 Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, Strong-Motion Data Set , 2006 .

[17]  Izzat M. Idriss,et al.  EVALUATING SEISMIC RISK IN ENGINEERING PRACTICE. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING, SAN FRANCISCO, 12-16 AUGUST 1985 , 1985 .

[18]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Empirical Near-Source Attenuation Relationships for Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Pseudo-Absolute Acceleration Response Spectra , 1997 .

[19]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  The Influence of Magnitude Range on Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction , 2007 .

[20]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates? , 2006 .

[21]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Empirical Prediction Equations for Peak Ground Velocity Derived from Strong-Motion Records from Europe and the Middle East , 2007 .

[22]  J. Douglas,et al.  Errata of and additions to 'Ground motion es timation equations 1964-2003' , 2006 .

[23]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  On the Use of Logic Trees for Ground-Motion Prediction Equations in Seismic-Hazard Analysis , 2005 .

[24]  N. Abrahamson Statistical properties of peak ground accelerations recorded by the SMART 1 array , 1988 .

[25]  John Douglas,et al.  USE OF ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF REGIONAL DEPENDENCE OF STRONG GROUND MOTIONS , 2002 .

[26]  David R. Brillinger,et al.  Further analysis of the Joyner-Boore attenuation data , 1985 .

[27]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Equations for Estimating Horizontal Response Spectra and Peak Acceleration from Western North American Earthquakes: A Summary of Recent Work , 1997 .

[28]  F. Scherbaum,et al.  On the Use of Response Spectral-Reference Data for the Selection and Ranking of Ground-Motion Models for Seismic-Hazard Analysis in Regions of Moderate Seismicity: The Case of Rock Motion , 2004 .

[29]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[30]  Mohammed I. El-Sabh,et al.  Advances in natural and technological hazards research , 1993 .

[31]  K. Campbell Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) empirical ground motion models : Can they be used in Europe , 2006 .

[32]  Lance Manuel,et al.  An empirical attenuation relationship for Northwestern Turkey ground motion using a random effects approach , 2004 .

[33]  P. Smit,et al.  The Digital Accelerograph Network in the Caucasus , 2000 .

[34]  K. Campbell Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA Ground Motion Relations for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of Peak and Spectral Ground Motion Parameters , 2007 .

[35]  M. Zare,et al.  SPECTRAL ATTENUATION OF STRONG MOTIONS FOR NEAR SOURCE DATA IN IRAN , 2008 .

[36]  K. Campbell,et al.  Updated Near-Source Ground-Motion (Attenuation) Relations for the Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration and Acceleration Response Spectra , 2003 .

[37]  J. Bommer,et al.  Relationships between Median Values and between Aleatory Variabilities for Different Definitions of the Horizontal Component of Motion , 2006 .

[38]  L. Danciu,et al.  Engineering Ground-Motion Parameters Attenuation Relationships for Greece , 2007 .

[39]  Polat Gülkan,et al.  Site-Dependent Spectra Derived from Ground Motion Records in Turkey , 2004 .

[40]  Polat Gülkan,et al.  Attenuation modeling of recent earthquakes in Turkey , 2002 .

[41]  F. Cotton,et al.  NEW EMPIRICAL RESPONSE SPECTRAL ATTENUATION LAWS FOR MODERATE EUROPEAN EARTHQUAKES , 2003 .

[42]  J. Douglas,et al.  Internet site for European strong-motion data , 2004 .

[43]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences , 2005 .

[44]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  Update of likelihood-based ground-motion model selection for seismic hazard analysis in western central Europe , 2007 .

[45]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Scaling of spectral displacement ordinates with damping ratios , 2005 .

[46]  Norman A. Abrahamson,et al.  An Overview of the Project of Next Generation of Ground Motion Attenuation Models for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes in Active Tectonic Regions , 2006 .

[47]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Orientation-Independent Measures of Ground Motion , 2006 .

[48]  J. Douglas Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates , 2003 .

[49]  John Douglas,et al.  An investigation of analysis of variance as a tool for exploring regional differences in strong ground motions , 2004 .