Content Validity of National Post Marriage Educational Program Using Mixed Methods

Background: Although the validity of content of program is mostly conducted with qualitative methods, this study used both qualitative and quantitative methods for the validation of content of post marriage training program provided for newly married couples. Content validity is a preliminary step of obtaining authorization required to install the program in country's health care system. Methods: This mixed methodological content validation study carried out in four steps with forming three expert panels. Altogether 24 expert panelists were involved in 3 qualitative and quantitative panels; 6 in the first item development one; 12 in the reduction kind, 4 of them were common with the first panel, and 10 executive experts in the last one organized to evaluate psychometric properties of CVR and CVI and Face validity of 57 educational objectives. Results: The raw data of post marriage program had been written by professional experts of Ministry of Health, using qualitative expert panel, the content was more developed by generating 3 topics and refining one topic and its respective content. In the second panel, totally six other objectives were deleted, three for being out of agreement cut of point and three on experts' consensus. The validity of all items was above 0.8 and their content validity indices (0.8–1) were completely appropriate in quantitative assessment. Conclusion: This study provided a good evidence for validation and accreditation of national post marriage program planned for newly married couples in health centers of the country in the near future.

[1]  H. Markman Backwards into the future of couples therapy and couples therapy research: A comment on Jacobson. , 1991 .

[2]  Fazlollah Ghofranipour,et al.  RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Development and psychometric properties of a belief-based Physical Activity Questionnaire for Diabetic Patients (PAQ-DP) , 2022 .

[3]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Designing a proficiency-based, content validated virtual reality curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi approach. , 2012, Surgery.

[4]  Jenifer Hamil-Luker,et al.  Processes of cumulative adversity: childhood disadvantage and increased risk of heart attack across the life course. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[5]  J. Younesi,et al.  THE STUDY OF DIVORCE REASONS IN TEHRAN FAMILY COURTS , 2011 .

[6]  Elizabeth Molsen,et al.  Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[7]  A. Bryman,et al.  Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods , 2004 .

[8]  Eun Hwa Lee,et al.  [Development of key indicators for nurses performance evaluation and estimation of their weights for management by objectives]. , 2010, Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.

[9]  John M. Gottman,et al.  Effects of Marital Discord on Young Children's Peer Interaction and Health , 1989 .

[10]  H. Markman,et al.  Preventing marital distress through communication and conflict management training: a 4- and 5-year follow-up. , 1993, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[11]  E. Hajizadeh,et al.  Development and psychometric properties of a new social support scale for self-care in middle-aged patients with type II diabetes (S4-MAD) , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[12]  E. Hajizadeh,et al.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the Premarital Sexual Behavior Assessment Scale for Young Women (PSAS-YW): an exploratory mixed method study , 2014, Reproductive Health.

[13]  N. Leidy,et al.  Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[14]  H. Markman,et al.  International perspectives on couple relationship education. , 2005, Family process.

[15]  P. Amato,et al.  Children of divorce in the 1990s: an update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. , 2001, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[16]  C. H. Lawshe A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY , 1975 .

[17]  Cheryl Tatano Beck,et al.  The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. , 2006, Research in nursing & health.

[18]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[19]  H. Markman,et al.  Best practice in couple relationship education. , 2003, Journal of marital and family therapy.

[20]  J. Boll Development of a Measure of Nurse Vigilance from the Patient ' s Perspective: A Content Validity Study , 2014 .

[21]  C T Beck,et al.  Ensuring Content Validity: An Illustration of the Process , 2001, Journal of Nursing Measurement.

[22]  D. Bagarozzi,et al.  A theoretically derived model of premarital intervention: The building of a family system , 1982 .

[23]  M. Guha The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods , 2005 .

[24]  H. DeVon,et al.  A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. , 2007, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[25]  P. Maxson,et al.  Marital and Family Enrichment Research: A Decade Review and Look Ahead. , 1990 .

[26]  Nahid Dehghan Nayeri,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Self-Management Scale for a Sample of Iranian Patients With Epilepsy , 2013, Nursing and midwifery studies.

[27]  S. Stack,et al.  Marital status and happiness : A 17-nation study , 1998 .

[28]  Melenie J. Lankau,et al.  Improving Construct Measurement In Management Research: Comments and a Quantitative Approach for Assessing the Theoretical Content Adequacy of Paper-and-Pencil Survey-Type Instruments , 1993 .

[29]  V. Tilden,et al.  Use of Qualitative Methods to Enhance Content Validity , 1990, Nursing research.

[30]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[31]  Timothy R. Hinkin A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations , 1995 .

[32]  G. Fitzmaurice,et al.  Socio-economic status, family disruption and residential stability in childhood: relation to onset, recurrence and remission of major depression , 2003, Psychological Medicine.

[33]  B. Silliman,et al.  Marriage Preparation Programs: A Literature Review , 2000 .