Simulations of frequency-resolved optical gating for measuring very complex pulses

Frequency-resolved optical gating (FROG) and its variations are the only techniques available for measuring complex pulses without a well-characterized reference pulse. We study the performance of the FROG generalized-projections algorithm for retrieving the intensity and phase of very complex ultrashort laser pulses [with time-bandwidth products (TBPs) of up to 100] in the presence of noise. We compare the performance of three versions of FROG: second-harmonic-generation (SHG) FROG, polarization-gate (PG) FROG, and cross-correlation FROG (XFROG), the last of which requires a well-characterized reference pulse. We found that the XFROG algorithm converged in all cases on the first initial guess. The PG FROG algorithm converged for all moderately complex pulses, for 99% of the pulses we tried, and for more than 95% of even the most complex pulses (TBP~100). The SHG FROG algorithm converged for 95% of the pulses we tried and for over 80% of even the most complex pulses. We found no additional ambiguities in any of these techniques.

[1]  R. Trebino.  Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating: The Measurement of Ultrashort Laser Pulses , 2000 .

[2]  Emmanuel Beaurepaire,et al.  Use of coherent control for selective two-photon fluorescence microscopy in live organisms. , 2006, Optics express.

[3]  A. Weiner.  Femtosecond pulse shaping using spatial light modulators , 2000 .

[4]  Marcos Dantus,et al.  Multiphoton intrapulse interference. IV. Ultrashort laser pulse spectral phase characterization and compensation. , 2004, Optics letters.

[5]  K R Wilson,et al.  Effect of pulse shape on the efficiency of multiphoton processes: implications for biological microscopy. , 1999, Journal of biomedical optics.

[6]  Khaled H. Hamed,et al.  Time-frequency analysis , 2003 .

[7]  D. Wiersma,et al.  Amplitude and phase characterization of 4.5-fs pulses by frequency-resolved optical gating. , 1998, Optics letters.

[8]  D. J. Kane,et al.  Real-time measurement of ultrashort laser pulses using principal component generalized projections , 1998 .

[9]  C. Iaconis,et al.  Spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction of ultrashort optical pulses , 1998, Technical Digest. Summaries of Papers Presented at the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. Conference Edition. 1998 Technical Digest Series, Vol.6 (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36178).

[10]  J P Heritage,et al.  Encoding and decoding of femtosecond pulses. , 1988, Optics letters.

[11]  Xianfan Xu,et al.  Laser machining using temporally controlled ultrafast pulses , 2004, Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, 2004. (CLEO)..

[12]  Ulrich A. Russek,et al.  Pulse compression by use of deformable mirrors. , 1999, Optics letters.

[13]  D. Strickland,et al.  Femtosecond laser pulse shaping by use of microsecond radio-frequency pulses. , 1994, Optics letters.

[14]  R. Altes.  Detection, estimation, and classification with spectrograms , 1980 .

[15]  Rick Trebino,et al.  Crossed-beam spectral interferometry: a simple, high-spectral-resolution method for completely characterizing complex ultrashort pulses in real time. , 2006, Optics express.

[16]  R. Trebino,et al.  Noise sensitivity in frequency-resolved optical-gating measurements of ultrashort pulses , 1995 .

[17]  D. Kane,et al.  Using phase retrieval to measure the intensity and phase of ultrashort pulses: frequency-resolved optical gating , 1993 .

[18]  Gregory E. Hall,et al.  CW autocorrelation measurements of picosecond laser pulses , 1980 .

[19]  Rick Trebino,et al.  Frequency-resolved optical gating and single-shot spectral measurements reveal fine structure in microstructure-fiber continuum. , 2002, Optics letters.

[20]  Y Silberberg,et al.  Femtosecond pulse-shape modulation at nanosecond rates. , 2005, Optics letters.

[21]  R. Trebino,et al.  Pulse retrieval in frequency-resolved optical gating based on the method of generalized projections. , 1994, Optics letters.