L1 regularization approach to structural damage detection using frequency data

Structural damage often occurs only at several locations that exhibit stiffness reduction at sparse elements out of the large total number of elements in the entire structure. The conventional vibration-based damage detection methods employ a so-called l2 regularization approach in model updating. This generally leads to the damaged elements distributed to numerous elements, which does not represent the actual case. A new l1 regularization approach is developed to detect structural damage using the first few frequency data. The technique is based on the sparse recovery theory that a sparse vector can be successfully recovered using a small number of measurement data. One advantage of using frequency data is that the first few frequencies can be measured more accurately and conveniently than mode shapes and other modal properties. A cantilever beam is utilized to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Only the first six modal frequencies are required to detect two damaged elements among 90 finite beam elements, which cannot be achieved using the conventional damage detection approach. The effects of measurement number, damage severity, number of damage, and noise level on damage detection results are also studied through a numerical example. The advantage of the new regularization approach over the conventional one is finally interpreted.

[1]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Structural damage identification via a combination of blind feature extraction and sparse representation classification , 2014 .

[2]  Hong Hao,et al.  Statistical damage identification of structures with frequency changes , 2003 .

[3]  Ying Wang,et al.  Damage Identification Scheme Based on Compressive Sensing , 2015, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[4]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Xinqun Zhu,et al.  Condition assessment of shear connectors in slab-girder bridges via vibration measurements , 2008 .

[6]  H. L. Taylor,et al.  Deconvolution with the l 1 norm , 1979 .

[7]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Cochlea-inspired sensing node for compressive sensing , 2013, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[8]  Ho-Yeon Jung,et al.  Damage detection for beam-like structures using the normalized curvature of a uniform load surface , 2013 .

[9]  R.G. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive Sensing [Lecture Notes] , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[10]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[11]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Compressed Sensing and Time-Parallel Reduced-Order Modeling for Structural Health Monitoring Using a DDDAS , 2007, International Conference on Computational Science.

[12]  Nuno M. M. Maia,et al.  Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis , 1997 .

[13]  Arun Kumar Pandey,et al.  Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes , 1991 .

[14]  Hong Hao,et al.  Damage identification of structures with uncertain frequency and mode shape data , 2002 .

[15]  Hong Hao,et al.  An introduction to compressive sensing and its potential applications in structural engineering , 2010 .

[16]  Yonina C. Eldar Compressed Sensing of Analog Signals , 2008, ArXiv.

[17]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review , 1996 .

[18]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  Sparsity-Aware Learning and Compressed Sensing: An Overview , 2012, ArXiv.

[19]  A. K. Pandey,et al.  Damage Detection in Structures Using Changes in Flexibility , 1994 .

[20]  Animesh Chatterjee,et al.  Structural damage assessment in a cantilever beam with a breathing crack using higher order frequency response functions , 2010 .

[21]  Yan Yu,et al.  Compressive sampling–based data loss recovery for wireless sensor networks used in civil structural health monitoring , 2013 .

[22]  Hong Hao,et al.  Dynamic assessment of shear connectors in slab-girder bridges , 2007 .

[23]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  The Local Flexibility method for Vibration-based damage localization and quantification , 2008 .

[24]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[25]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive Sensing , 2008, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[26]  James L Beck,et al.  Compressive sampling for accelerometer signals in structural health monitoring , 2011 .

[27]  Patrick Flandrin,et al.  Time-frequency localization from sparsity constraints , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[28]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  An Interior-Point Method for Large-Scale $\ell_1$-Regularized Least Squares , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[29]  O. S. Salawu Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review , 1997 .

[30]  Robert D. Adams,et al.  The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies , 1979 .

[31]  ProblemsPer Christian HansenDepartment The L-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems , 2000 .

[32]  R. B. Testa,et al.  Modal Analysis for Damage Detection in Structures , 1991 .