Analysing co-benefits of the energy conservation and carbon reduction in China's large commercial buildings

Abstract Energy consumption keeps increasing in China's building sector with the constant growth of urban population and people's living standard. In order to achieve co-benefits of reducing energy use, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy costs effectively, all respects related to the energy performance in the building sector need to be addressed. Considering the fact that over 80% of total energy use in a building's lifecycle is contributed by the operation stage, the study's focus is put on this stage for well understanding the energy consumption and carbon emissions and exploring the approach to achieve the effectiveness of co-benefits. The energy use in large commercial buildings is 4–6 times higher than residential buildings in China, thus IKEA Xuhui Store as one of large shopping malls in Shanghai is selected as the case study by using the method formed in the study. The outcomes of research show that the benefit of annual 170 MWh of energy use and 150 tons of CO 2 e reduction as well as the significant economic benefit have been achieved by implementing different measures in IKEA Xuhui Store between 2008 and 2011. Existing investment, technology and capacity barriers to co-benefits approach in a wider consideration of China's building sector are described. The assessment for evaluating co-benefits of cutting energy use and CO 2 emissions in the production and demolition stages in a building's lifecycle are also addressed by the paper. However, it is very complicated to make a lifecycle assessment on the overall co-benefits in the building sector because of the complexity and the lack of available data for the research.

[1]  Yong Geng,et al.  Uncovering China’s greenhouse gas emission from regional and sectoral perspectives , 2012 .

[2]  Geng Yong,et al.  Eco-indicators: Improve China's sustainability targets , 2011, Nature.

[3]  A. Hawkes Estimating marginal CO2 emissions rates for national electricity systems , 2010 .

[4]  Kristin Aunan,et al.  Co-benefits of climate policy—lessons learned from a study in Shanxi, China , 2004 .

[5]  Yan Xu,et al.  Local air pollutant emission reduction and ancillary carbon benefits of SO2 control policies: Application of AIM/CGE model to China , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  “Co-benefits” of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies in China: An Integrated Top-Down and Bottom-Up Modeling Analysis , 2008 .

[7]  Kebin He,et al.  Co-benefits from energy policies in China , 2010 .

[8]  中華人民共和国国家統計局 China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[9]  Ping Jiang,et al.  Overcoming barriers to implementation of carbon reduction strategies in large commercial buildings in China , 2010 .

[10]  A. Seth,et al.  Global climate change: An introduction and results from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) , 2007 .

[11]  R. Madlener,et al.  Impacts of urbanization on urban structures and energy demand: What can we learn for urban energy planning and urbanization management? , 2011 .

[12]  Ping Jiang,et al.  Analysis of national and local energy-efficiency design standards in the public building sector in China , 2011 .

[13]  Housing price fluctuations across China: An equilibrium mechanism perspective , 2007 .

[14]  Yong Geng,et al.  Achieving national emission reduction target--China's new challenge and opportunity. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .