Using spatial frequency adaptation to study word recognition

The study of spatial frequency is being used increasingly often to investigate processes underlying visual word recognition. However, research in this area has adopted techniques that require the physical deformation of word targets used in experiments (e.g., filtered images of words, words embedded in visual noise), and this approach may limit the inferences that can be made about the role of spatial frequencies in normal word recognition.Spatial frequency adaptation is described in this article as an additional technique for studying the role of spatial frequency information in word recognition. The advantage of this technique is that it alters participants’ sensitivity to particular spatial frequencies and so allows the study of spatial frequency involvement in word recognition using normal images of word stimuli. The application of the adaptation technique to studies of word recognition is explained in detail and its potential is then demonstrated by an example word recognition experiment in which spatial frequency adaptation was used.

[1]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  H. H. Mikaelian.  Changes in Contrast Sensitivity Function Produced by VDT Use , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[3]  A. Healy,et al.  Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[5]  D. Bodinger.  The decay of grating adaptation , 1978, Vision Research.

[6]  D. Madden,et al.  Adult Age Invariance in Sentence Unitization , 2000 .

[7]  M. Greenlee,et al.  Marathon adaptation to spatial contrast: Saturation in sight , 1985, Vision Research.

[8]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  The time course of adaptation to spatial contrast , 1991, Vision Research.

[9]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[10]  T R Jordan,et al.  The Illusory-Letters Phenomenon: An Illustration of Graphemic Restoration in Visual Word Recognition , 1999, Perception.

[11]  D. Besner,et al.  Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The Effects of Case Mixing on Word Recognition: Evidence from a PET Study , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[15]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[16]  Sharon M. Thomas,et al.  Asymmetries and Eccentricities in Studies of Lateralised Word Recognition: A Response to Nazir , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[17]  R. Snowden.  Adaptability of the visual system is inversely related to its sensitivity. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  Markus Meister,et al.  Retina versus Cortex Contrast Adaptation in Parallel Visual Pathways , 2004, Neuron.

[19]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Facilitation and masking of briefly presented gratings: Time-course and contrast dependence , 1987, Vision Research.

[21]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Spatial frequency adaptation can enhance contrast sensitivity. , 1977, Vision research.

[22]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[23]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Perceiving exterior letters of words: differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Arthur P. Ginsburg,et al.  Spatial filtering and visual form perception. , 1986 .

[25]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[26]  D. Spinelli,et al.  The effects of spatial frequency adaptation on human evoked potentials , 1976, Vision Research.

[27]  T. R. Jordan,et al.  Assessing effects of fixation demands on perception of lateralized words: A visual window technique for studying hemispheric asymmetry , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Robert Michael Jones,et al.  Local retinal adaptation and spatial frequency channels , 1975, Vision Research.

[29]  T. R. Jordan.  Testing the BOSS hypothesis: Evidence for position-insensitive orthographic priming in the lexical decision task , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[30]  P. Lennie,et al.  Profound Contrast Adaptation Early in the Visual Pathway , 2004, Neuron.

[31]  G. M. Reicher.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  T. R. Jordan,et al.  Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[33]  D. Hooper,et al.  The use of assembled phonology during performance of a letter recognition task and its dependence on the presence and proportion of word stimuli , 1997 .

[34]  K I Forster,et al.  The prime lexicality effect: form-priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  D. D. Wheeler.  Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[36]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[37]  Steve Suter,et al.  Spatial-frequency-tuned attenuation and enhancement of the steady-state VEP by grating adaptation , 1991, Vision Research.

[38]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.

[39]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Lexical and nonlexical phonological priming in reading aloud. , 1999 .

[40]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Stimulus specificity in the human visual system. , 1973, Vision research.

[41]  M. Meister,et al.  Fast and Slow Contrast Adaptation in Retinal Circuitry , 2002, Neuron.

[42]  B Wallace,et al.  Influence of case type, word frequency, and exposure duration on visual word recognition. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[44]  F. Heitger,et al.  The functional role of contrast adaptation , 1988, Vision Research.

[45]  T. R. Jordan,et al.  Position-specific masking and the word-letter phenomenon: Reexamining the evidence from the Reicher-Wheeler paradigm. , 1996 .

[46]  J. Robson,et al.  Discrimination at threshold: Labelled detectors in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[47]  J. M. Cattell.  Ueber die Zeit der Erkennung und Benennung von Schriftzeichen, Bildern und Farben@@@Ueber die Tragheit der Netzhaut und des Sehcentrums@@@The Influence of the Intensity of the Stimulus on the Length of the Reaction Time , 1888 .

[48]  R Lunn,et al.  Visual Fatigue and Spatial Frequency Adaptation to Video Displays of Text , 1986, Human factors.

[49]  Knut Nordby,et al.  Time course of contrast adaptation to VDU-displayed text , 1992 .

[50]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[51]  H. Barber,et al.  Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs , 2004, Neuroreport.

[52]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  CHAPTER 29 PSYCHOPHYSICAL METHODS , 1996 .

[53]  Robert Michael Jones,et al.  Accuracy of image stabilization by an optical-electronic feedback system , 1975, Vision Research.

[54]  The role of phonology in a letter detection task , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[55]  Sharon M. Thomas,et al.  Assessing the Role of Hemispheric Specialisation, Serial-Position Processing, and Retinal Eccentricity in Lateralised Word RecognitioN , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[56]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  D Rose,et al.  Dynamics of Adaptation to Contrast , 1982, Perception.

[58]  F H Marriott.  Thresholds for negative after‐images. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[59]  Changes in contrast sensitivity function produced by VDT use , 1988 .

[60]  G. Boynton,et al.  Orientation-Specific Adaptation in Human Visual Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Central Fixations are Inadequately Controlled by Instructions Alone: Implications for Studying Cerebral Asymmetry , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[62]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.

[64]  Justin L. Gardner,et al.  Contrast Adaptation and Representation in Human Early Visual Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[65]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Presenting words without interior letters: Superiority over single letters and influence of postmask boundaries. , 1990 .

[66]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers , 2003, Brain and Language.

[67]  Geoffrey M. Boynton,et al.  Forward pattern masking and adaptation: Effects of duration, interstimulus interval, contrast, and spatial and temporal frequency , 1993, Vision Research.

[68]  R. Evans,et al.  Evidence against saturation of contrast adaptation in the human visual system , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[69]  Michael Bach,et al.  Contrast adaptation in retinal and cortical evoked potentials: No adaptation to low spatial frequencies , 2002, Visual Neuroscience.