Bicuspid Aortic Valve : Four-dimensional MR Evaluation of Ascending Aortic Systolic Flow Patterns 1

PURPOSE To use time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, also called four-dimensional flow MR imaging, to evaluate systolic blood flow patterns in the ascending aorta that may predispose patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) to aneurysm. MATERIALS AND METHODS The HIPAA-compliant protocol received institutional review board approval, and informed consent was obtained. Four-dimensional flow MR imaging was used to assess blood flow in the thoracic aorta of 53 individuals: 20 patients with a BAV, 25 patients with a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), and eight healthy volunteers. The Fisher exact test was used to evaluate the significance of flow pattern differences. RESULTS Nested helical flow was seen at peak systole in the ascending aorta of 15 of 20 patients with a BAV but in none of the healthy volunteers or patients with a TAV. This flow pattern was seen both in patients with a BAV with a dilated ascending aorta (n = 6) and in those with a normal ascending aorta (n = 9), was seen in the absence of aortic stenosis (n = 5), and was associated with eccentric systolic flow jets in all cases. Fusion of right and left leaflets gave rise to right-handed helical flow and right-anterior flow jets (n = 11), whereas right and noncoronary fusion gave rise to left-handed helical flow with left-posterior flow jets (n = 4). CONCLUSION Four-dimensional flow MR imaging showed abnormal helical systolic flow in the ascending aorta of patients with a BAV, including those without aneurysm or aortic stenosis. Identification and characterization of eccentric flow jets in these patients may help identify those at risk for development of ascending aortic aneurysm.

[1]  Murat Aksoy,et al.  Time‐resolved 3D quantitative flow MRI of the major intracranial vessels: Initial experience and comparative evaluation at 1.5T and 3.0T in combination with parallel imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Michael Markl,et al.  Time‐resolved three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  M. Fogel,et al.  Nonuniform flow dynamics in the aorta of normal children: A simplified approach to measurement using magnetic resonance velocity mapping , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Richard S. Lee,et al.  The aortopathy of bicuspid aortic valve disease has distinctive patterns and usually involves the transverse aortic arch. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  N J Pelc,et al.  Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: Analysis and correction , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  J. Child,et al.  Structural Abnormalities of Great Arterial Walls in Congenital Heart Disease: Light and Electron Microscopic Analyses , 2001, Circulation.

[7]  T. Rea,et al.  A Community-Based Study , 2004 .

[8]  C. Ward.  Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve , 2000, Heart.

[9]  G. Thiene,et al.  Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves , 1999, Heart.

[10]  J. Hennig,et al.  Sclerotic aortic valve: flow-sensitive 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reveals 3 distinct flow-pattern changes. , 2007, Circulation.

[11]  R. Devereux,et al.  Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  I. Mwangi,et al.  Steady‐state free‐precession (SSFP) cine MRI in distinguishing normal and bicuspid aortic valves , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Richard Frayne,et al.  Visualizing three‐dimensional flow with simulated streamlines and three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MR imaging , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  J. Bavaria,et al.  Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions. , 2000, Circulation.

[15]  P. Walker,et al.  Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  D N Firmin,et al.  Blood flow patterns in the human aorta studied by magnetic resonance. , 1987, British heart journal.

[17]  S. Verma,et al.  Clinical and Pathophysiological Implications of a Bicuspid Aortic Valve , 2002, Circulation.

[18]  N. Silverman,et al.  Morphology and function of the bicuspid aortic valve with and without coarctation of the aorta in the young. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  R. Devereux,et al.  Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  Roland Hetzer,et al.  Different Hemodynamic Stress of the Ascending Aorta Wall in Patients with Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valve , 2006, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[21]  C M Otto,et al.  The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape , 2008, Heart.

[22]  S. Siu,et al.  Retrospective study to identify predictors of the presence and rapid progression of aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[23]  J. Carr,et al.  Orthogonal measurement of thoracic aorta luminal diameter using ECG‐gated high‐resolution contrast‐enhanced MR angiography , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  R. Hetzer,et al.  Configuration of the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve disease undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without reduction aortoplasty. , 2006, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[25]  C. Russo,et al.  Is aortic wall degeneration related to bicuspid aortic valve anatomy in patients with valvular disease? , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[26]  M. Alley,et al.  Time-Resolved 3-Dimensional Velocity Mapping in the Thoracic Aorta: Visualization of 3-Directional Blood Flow Patterns in Healthy Volunteers and Patients , 2004, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[27]  D N Firmin,et al.  Quantitation of antegrade and retrograde blood flow in the human aorta by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. , 1989, American heart journal.

[28]  M. Alley,et al.  Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four‐dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  G. Glover,et al.  Generalized reconstruction of phase contrast MRI: Analysis and correction of the effect of gradient field distortions , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Helical and Retrograde Secondary Flow Patterns in the Aortic Arch Studied by Three‐Directional Magnetic Resonance Velocity Mapping , 1993, Circulation.

[31]  Paul Khairy,et al.  Bicuspid aortic valve morphology and interventions in the young. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  Changes in size of ascending aorta and aortic valve function with time in patients with congenitally bicuspid aortic valves , 2003 .

[33]  C. Higgins,et al.  MR Imaging of the Thoracic Aorta in Marfan Patients , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[34]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Mechanisms underlying aortic dilatation in congenital aortic valve malformation. , 1999, Circulation.

[35]  P. Byers,et al.  Usefulness of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype to predict elastic properties of the ascending aorta. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.