Comparative Evaluation of a New Fluorescent Carboxyfluorescein Diacetate-Modified Microdilution Method for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida albicans Isolates

ABSTRACT This report presents a fluorescent carboxyfluorescein diacetate (CFDA)-modified microdilution method used for the susceptibility testing of Candida albicans to amphotericin B, fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine. Four different broth microdilution susceptibility testing methods were simultaneously evaluated at 24 and 48 h. The MICs determined using the CFDA-modified method (MICcfda) were compared to those obtained by the standard broth microdilution method (MICvisual) and a procedure employing the indicator Alamar blue (MICalamar). The reference MIC was determined visually as recommended by the NCCLS M27-A protocol, and then quantified spectrophotometrically following agitation (MICspec). The CFDA-modified microdilution method was demonstrated to effectively determine the MICs for all the antifungal drugs tested at both 24 and 48 h. The results from both the MICspec and MICcfda methods yielded >80% agreement within ±1 dilution and >90% agreement within ±2 dilutions at 24 h in comparison to the reference MICvisual method, respectively. The trailing growth phenomenon that occurs with azole antifungal drugs and many strains of C. albicans did not inhibit the effectiveness of the MICspec and MICcfda methods. The MICspec and MICcfda methods shared 92.8% agreement within ±1 dilution at 24 h and 87.6% agreement within ±1 dilution at 48 h.

[1]  E. Ernst Investigational Antifungal Agents , 2001, Pharmacotherapy.

[2]  R. Rennie,et al.  Novel Fluorescent Broth Microdilution Method for Fluconazole Susceptibility Testing of Candida albicans , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  M. Ghannoum,et al.  The Exciting Future of Antifungal Therapy , 2000, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[4]  B. Arthington-Skaggs,et al.  Quantitation of Candida albicans Ergosterol Content Improves the Correlation between In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Test Results and In Vivo Outcome after Fluconazole Treatment in a Murine Model of Invasive Candidiasis , 2000, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[5]  J. M. Torres-Rodríguez,et al.  In vitro susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates to five antifungal drugs using a colorimetric system and the reference microbroth method. , 2000, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[6]  Ronald N. Jones,et al.  Bloodstream Infections Due to Candida Species: SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program in North America and Latin America, 1997-1998 , 2000, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[7]  Albert Balows,et al.  Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 7th ed. , 2000 .

[8]  T. C. White,et al.  The Trailing End Point Phenotype in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Is pH Dependent , 1999, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[9]  R. Rennie,et al.  Assessment of the Effect of Amphotericin B on the Vitality of Candida albicans , 1999, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[10]  M. H. Nguyen,et al.  Influence of Incubation Time, Inoculum Size, and Glucose Concentrations on Spectrophotometric Endpoint Determinations for Amphotericin B, Fluconazole, and Itraconazole , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[11]  E. Anaissie,et al.  Optimizing the Correlation between Results of Testing In Vitro and Therapeutic Outcome In Vivo for Fluconazole by Testing Critical Isolates in a Murine Model of Invasive Candidiasis , 1998, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[12]  S. Redding,et al.  Interpretation of Trailing Endpoints in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Method , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  F. Dromer,et al.  Antifungal drug resistance in pathogenic fungi. , 1998, Medical mycology.

[14]  M. Ghannoum,et al.  Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro-in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and candida infections. Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the National Committee for Clinical Labora , 1997, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[15]  E. Anaissie,et al.  Microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans with and without agitation: an eight-center collaborative study , 1996, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[16]  J. Martínez-Suárez,et al.  Comparison of two alternative microdilution procedures with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference macrodilution method M27-P for in vitro testing of fluconazole-resistant and -susceptible isolates of Candida albicans , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[17]  M. Rinaldi,et al.  Comparative evaluation of macrodilution and alamar colorimetric microdilution broth methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[18]  M. Pfaller,et al.  Comparison of visual and spectrophotometric methods of MIC endpoint determinations by using broth microdilution methods to test five antifungal agents, including the new triazole D0870 , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[19]  M. Pfaller,et al.  Evaluation of a novel colorimetric broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates , 1994, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[20]  J. Galgiani,et al.  Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts , 1993, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[21]  M. Pfaller,et al.  Antifungal susceptibility testing. Current state of technology, limitations, and standardization. , 1993, Infectious disease clinics of North America.

[22]  B. Haarer,et al.  Fluorescence microscopy methods for yeast. , 1989, Methods in cell biology.

[23]  F. Odds Laboratory evaluation of antifungal agents: a comparative study of five imidazole derivatives of clinical importance. , 1980, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[24]  E. Bruck,et al.  National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. , 1980, Pediatrics.