Mach 8 Testing of a Scramjet Engine with Ramp Compression

To improve combustion efficiency and the inlet started condition, a scramjet model having a ramp combined with a single strut was tested under Mach 8 flight conditions at the Ramjet Engine Test Facility of the National Aerospace Laboratory, Japan. The attached ramp shielded some of the fuel injectors. The fuel flow rate from the open injectors to the flow path was designated as the effective fuel flow rate. In the tests, a combustion efficiency of 90% was attained with vertical injection of hydrogen fuel. The thrust increase was 590 N at the effective equivalence ratio of 1.3. However, because the engine geometry was not optimized, a sufficient increase of the thrust was not attained. High temperature and high pressure necessary for ignition and combustion were achieved by the ramp. When the pressure in the isolator was 160 times as high as that of the freestream air due to combustion, the inlet was in the started condition despite the high pressure. This improved started condition was attained by using the ramp to increase the pressure in the inlet.

[1]  Takeshi Kanda,et al.  Reaction and Mixing-Controlled Combustion in Scramjet Engines , 2001 .

[2]  Birgit Reinartz,et al.  Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of a Hypersonic Inlet Isolator Using Computation and Experiment , 2003 .

[3]  Kouichiro Tani,et al.  Effect of Sides-Spillage from Airframe on Scramjet Engine Performance , 2001 .

[4]  Sadatake Tomioka,et al.  Mach 6 Testing of a Scramjet Engine Model , 1996 .

[5]  Kiyoshi Hasegawa,et al.  An Approximate Approach to Base Flow Behind Two-Dimensional Rearward-Facing Steps Placed in a Uniform Supersonic Stream , 1973 .

[6]  F. White Viscous Fluid Flow , 1974 .

[7]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Numerical analysis of scramjet combusting flows by unstructured hybrid grid method , 2000 .

[8]  Sadatake Tomioka,et al.  Analyses and Application of Gas Sampling to Scramjet Engine Testing , 1999 .

[9]  W. J. Egan,et al.  Penetration and mixing of multiple gas jets subjected to a cross flow , 1971 .

[10]  T. Sunami,et al.  Mach 4 Tests of a Scramjet Engine-Effects of Isolator , 1997 .

[11]  Takashi Shimura,et al.  Testing of a scramjet engine with a strut in M8 flight conditions , 1998 .

[12]  I. E. Beckwith,et al.  Local Heat Transfer and Recovery Temperatures on a Yawed Cylinder at a Mach Number of 4.15 and High Reynolds Numbers , 1961 .

[13]  Shigeru Sato,et al.  Comparison of Scramjet Engine Performance in Mach 6 Vitiated and Storage-Heated Air , 1997 .

[14]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Drags in Scramjet Engine Testing: Experimental and Computational Fluid Dynamics Studies , 1999 .

[15]  S. Sato,et al.  Scramjet Engine Test at the Mach 6 Flight Condition , 1997 .

[16]  Sadatake Tomioka,et al.  Mach 8 Testing of a Scramjet Engine Model , 2001 .

[17]  F. Billig,et al.  Structure of Shock Waves in Cylindrical Ducts , 1973 .