Modelling the damage and deformation process in a plastic bonded explosive microstructure under tension using the finite element method

Abstract Modelling the deformation and failure processes occurring in polymer bonded explosives (PBX) and other energetic materials is of great importance for processing methods and lifetime storage purposes. Crystal debonding is undesirable since this can lead to contamination and a reduction in mechanical properties. An insensitive high explosive (PBX-1) was the focus of the study. This binary particulate composite consists of (TATB) filler particles encapsulated in a polymeric binder (KELF800). The particle/matrix interface was characterised with a bi-linear cohesive law, the filler was treated as elastic and the matrix as visco-hyperelastic. Material parameters were determined experimentally for the binder and the cohesive parameters were obtained previously from Williamson et al. (2014) and Gee et al. (2007) for the interface. Once calibrated, the material laws were implemented in a finite element model to allow the macroscopic response of the composite to be simulated. A finite element mesh was generated using a SEM image to identify the filler particles which are represented as a set of 2D polygons. Simulated microstructures were also generated with the same size distribution and volume fraction only with the idealised assumption that the particles are a set of circles in 2D and spheres in 3D. The various model results were compared and a number of other variables were examined for their influence on the global deformation behaviour such as strain rate, cohesive parameters and contrast between filler and matrix modulus. The overwhelming outcome is that the geometry of the particles plays a crucial role in determining the onset of failure and the severity of fracture in relation to whether it is a purely local or global failure. The model was validated against a set of uniaxial tensile tests on PBX-1 and it was found that it predicted the initial modulus and failure stress and strain well.

[1]  William G. Proud,et al.  The mechanical response of a PBX and binder: combining results across the strain-rate and frequency domains , 2010 .

[2]  Albert Turon Travesa Simulation of delamination in composites under quasi-static and fatigue loading using cohesive zone models , 2006 .

[3]  Pengwan Chen,et al.  Microstructure, deformation and failure of polymer bonded explosives , 2007 .

[4]  Pengwan Chen,et al.  Fracture behavior of PBX simulation subject to combined thermal and mechanical loads , 2009 .

[5]  P. Harrison,et al.  Mechanical modeling of incompressible particle-reinforced neo-Hookean composites based on numerical homogenization , 2014 .

[6]  H. Kilian,et al.  Fundamental aspects of rubber-elasticity in real networks , 1984 .

[7]  R. Taylor,et al.  Thermomechanical analysis of viscoelastic solids , 1970 .

[8]  D. Thompson,et al.  Time–Temperature Analysis, Tension and Compression in PBXs , 2012 .

[9]  D. Allen,et al.  A model for predicting the evolution of damage in viscoelastic particle-reinforced composites , 2005 .

[10]  G. P. Tandon,et al.  The effect of aspect ratio of inclusions on the elastic properties of unidirectionally aligned composites , 1984 .

[11]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[12]  D. M. Williamson,et al.  AN IMAGE BASED APPROACH TO MODELLING PLASTIC BONDED EXPLOSIVES ( PBX ) ON THE MICRO SCALE , 2013 .

[13]  Maria N. Charalambides,et al.  Image-based modelling of binary composites , 2012 .

[14]  A. Kinloch,et al.  The modelling of the toughening of epoxy polymers via silica nanoparticles: The effects of volume fraction and particle size , 2013 .

[15]  J. Williams Particle toughening of polymers by plastic void growth , 2010 .

[16]  M. Charalambides,et al.  Tensile properties of latex paint films with TiO2 pigment , 2009 .

[17]  J. Williams,et al.  Stress analysis of polymers , 1973 .

[18]  A. Patnaik,et al.  Experimental and finite element analysis of mechanical and fracture behavior of SiC particulate filled A356 alloy composites: Part I , 2015 .

[19]  P. J. Rae,et al.  Quasi–static studies of the deformation and failure of β–HMX based polymer bonded explosives , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  B. Clements,et al.  Dynamic mechanical behavior of filled polymers. I. Theoretical developments , 2001 .

[21]  A. Jardine,et al.  Thermodynamic work of adhesion measurements of polymer bonded explosive constituents via the Wilhelmy plate technique and their application to AFM pull-off experiments , 2014 .

[22]  Wu Yan-qing,et al.  A micromechanical model for predicting combined damage of particles and interface debonding in PBX explosives , 2009 .

[23]  H. M. Inglis,et al.  Multiscale modeling of solid propellants: From particle packing to failure , 2007 .

[24]  R. Young,et al.  A predictive model for particulate-filled composite materials , 1989 .

[25]  P. J. Rae,et al.  Quasi–static studies of the deformation and failure of PBX 9501 , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[26]  J. Williams,et al.  Large deformation extensional rheology of bread dough , 2006 .

[27]  Min Zhou,et al.  A Lagrangian framework for analyzing microstructural level response of polymer-bonded explosives , 2011 .

[28]  J. G. Williams,et al.  Mechanical characterization and micromechanical modeling of bread dough. , 2013 .

[29]  S. Reese,et al.  Finite Element-Based Micromechanical Modeling of Microstructure Morphology in Filler-Reinforced Elastomer , 2014 .

[30]  M. Charalambides,et al.  Influence of the inorganic phase concentration and geometry on the viscoelastic properties of latex coatings through the glass-transition , 2011 .

[31]  H. Kausch,et al.  Parameters determining the strength and toughness of particulate filled epoxide resins , 1987 .

[32]  B. Clements,et al.  Dynamic mechanical behavior of filled polymers. II. Applications , 2001 .

[33]  J. Williams,et al.  Micromechanical models for stiffness prediction of alumina trihydrate (ATH) reinforced poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA): Effect of filler volume fraction and temperature , 2009 .

[34]  A. Maiti,et al.  Molecular dynamics investigation of adhesion between TATB surfaces and amorphous fluoropolymers , 2007 .

[35]  Yiu-Wing Mai,et al.  Critical particle size for interfacial debonding in polymer/nanoparticle composites , 2010 .

[36]  J. G. Williams,et al.  Determination of the Constitutive Constants of Non-Linear Viscoelastic Materials , 2004 .

[37]  Y. Mai,et al.  Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites , 2008 .

[38]  Ege A Diler,et al.  An experimental and statistical study of interaction effects of matrix particle size, reinforcement particle size and volume fraction on the flexural strength of Al–SiCp composites by P/M using central composite design , 2012 .

[39]  Leon Mishnaevsky,et al.  Three-dimensional numerical testing of microstructures of particle reinforced composites , 2004 .

[40]  H. Rothert,et al.  Formulation and implementation of three-dimensional viscoelasticity at small and finite strains , 1997 .