Development of a Central Matching System for the Allocation of Cadaveric Kidneys

Objectives: 1) To develop a computer-based simulation to prospectively study the impacts of explicitly incorporating different equity criteria into the process of allocating kidneys to recipients, given the scarcity of this resource. 2) To assess the tradeoffs between systems that allocate kidneys based only on medical criteria, systems that allocate kidneys based only on equity criteria, and systems that consider both medical and equity criteria. Methods: A computer-based simulation was developed that describes the flows of patients and kidneys. This model provides information at various time points about the number of patients in the system who are awaiting transplants, the number of kidneys available for transplantation, the number of transplantations performed for each matching algorithm, and the number of kidneys discarded (when applicable), as well as the means and standard deviations of the HLA-match scores, number of days from registration to transplantation, and number of days (from registration) of those who are still waiting for transplants. Five different matching algorithms were compared, ranging from determination of the allocation by a single medical criterion (i.e., HLA match) to determination by a single equity criterion (i.e., relative position in the waiting queue). The remaining algorithms represent different strategies of weighting these two considerations. Estimates regarding the main parameters of the model were derived utilizing data collected through the Multiple Organ Retrieval and Exchange Pro gramme of Ontario, Canada. Results : The simulation was set to run for a period of ten years. A tradeoff between graft survival (or improved HLA matching) and equal treatment of patients regardless of their likelihood to benefit was found. It is clear that an algorithm that allocates kidneys based only on temporal location of patient on the waiting list is likely to be unac ceptable because of the very poor average HLA-match scores that it yields. Pool size was found to be a major determinant in the attainment of optimal matching from a medical perspective. Conclusions: 1) The final choice about any allocation algorithm to be used requires that a value judgment be made, i.e., how great a reduction in HLA-match score should be traded in order to improve equity score (or vice versa). 2) A computer-based simulation model is a feasible way to prospectively test the impact of any given allocation algorithm on any given system. Key words: simulation; kidney transplant; equity; efficiency. (Med Decis Making 1994;14:124-136)

[1]  M. R. Mickey,et al.  DOMINANT EFFECT OF HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ON TEN‐YEAR KIDNEY TRANSPLANT SURVIVAL , 1988, Transplantation.

[2]  A. Spital The shortage of organs for transplantation. Where do we go from here? , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  W. Braun Every kidney counts. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  O S Miettinen,et al.  THE SEARCH FOR AN HL‐A‐ AND ABO‐COMPATIBLE CADAVER ORGAN FOR TRANSPLANTATION: Probabilistic Asssessment of the Outlook , 1972, Transplantation.

[5]  J. Chapman,et al.  Survival of DNA HLA-DR typed and matched cadaver kidney transplants , 1991, The Lancet.

[6]  R. Wolfe,et al.  The impact of nonidentical ABO cadaveric renal transplantation on waiting times and graft survival. , 1991, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[7]  P. Terasaki,et al.  The benefit and underutilization of sharing kidneys for better histocompatibility. , 1989, Transplantation.

[8]  S. Knechtle,et al.  THE EFFECT OF DONOR AGE, RECIPIENT AGE, AND HLA MATCH ON IMMUNOLOGIC GRAFT SURVIVAL IN CADAVER RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS1 , 1992, Transplantation.

[9]  A. Spital The shortage of organs for transplantation. , 1992 .

[10]  S. Gore,et al.  BENEFICIAL HLA MATCHING , 1986, The Lancet.

[11]  A. Gafni,et al.  Equity considerations in utility-based measures of health outcomes in economic appraisals: an adjustment algorithm. , 1991, Journal of health economics.

[12]  E G Lowrie,et al.  The quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  M. R. Mickey,et al.  Recipient pool sizes for prioritized HLA matching. , 1989, Transplantation.

[14]  R. Simmons,et al.  QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Cyclosporine and Conventional Immunosuppressive Therapy , 1988, Transplantation.

[15]  S Takemoto,et al.  National allocation of cadaveric kidneys by HLA matching. Projected effect on outcome and costs. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  T E Starzl,et al.  A multifactorial system for equitable selection of cadaver kidney recipients. , 1987, JAMA.

[17]  I. Harvey,et al.  Potential availability of cadaver organs for transplantation. , 1991, BMJ.

[18]  W K Vaughn,et al.  Factors affecting the waiting time of cadaveric kidney transplant candidates in the United States. , 1992, JAMA.

[19]  G. Opelz The benefit of exchanging donor kidneys among transplant centers. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  C. Davis,et al.  The prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplantation. , 1990, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[21]  J. Alexander,et al.  INCIDENCE AND MORBIDITY OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DISEASE ASSOCIATED WITH A SERONEGATIVE RECIPIENT RECEIVING SEROPOSITIVE DONOR‐SPECIFIC TRANSFUSION AND LIVING‐RELATED DONOR TRANSPLANTATION: A Multicenter Evaluation , 1988, Transplantation.

[22]  D. Gjertson,et al.  Survival of nationally shared, HLA-matched kidney transplants from cadaveric donors. The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Alexander,et al.  The use of "marginal" donors for organ transplantation. The influence of donor age on outcome. , 1991, Transplantation.

[24]  J. Childress,et al.  Ethical criteria for procuring and distributing organs for transplantation. , 1989, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[25]  D Ryan Cook,et al.  Equitable allocation of livers for orthotopic transplantation: an application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. , 1990, European journal of operational research.

[26]  B. O'Brien A game-theoretic approach to donor kidney sharing. , 1988, Social science & medicine.

[27]  N. Halasz MEDICINE AND ETHICS How TO ALLOCATE TRANSPLANTABLE ORGANS , 1991, Transplantation.

[28]  P. Terasaki,et al.  ANALYSES OF THE UNOS SCIENTIFIC RENAL TRANSPLANT REGISTRY AT THREE YEARS—EARLY EVENTS AFFECTING TRANSPLANT SUCCESS1–3 , 1992, Transplantation.

[29]  P. Eggers,et al.  Effect of transplantation on the Medicare end-stage renal disease program. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  B. Chavers,et al.  LONG‐TERM QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION IN CHILDHOOD , 1991, Transplantation.