Interfacial Characteristics of Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Materials: A Study on Fluid Permeability Using Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

The tooth interface with resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RM GICs) is poorly understood. This study examined the interface, especially with dentin. Cervical cavities in extracted teeth were restored with Fuji II LC, Vitremer, Photac-Fil, or a conventional GIC, Fuji Cap II. Fluorescent dye was placed in the pulp chambers for 3 hrs before the specimens were sectioned. Examination of the tooth/material interface with a confocal microscope showed that dye uptake by the restoration varied among materials. A "structureless", non-particulate, highly-stained layer of GIC was observed next to dentin in Fuji II LC. This layer varied in width, was prominent where the dentin tubules were cut "end-on" and in areas closer to the pulp, and was not seen adjacent to enamel. Vitremer showed minimal dye uptake, and the "structureless" layer was barely discernible. Photac-Fil showed more uniform uptake and absence of this layer. Cracking of enamel was also noted with these materials. The conventional GIC did not show any dye uptake, presence of a "structureless" layer, or enamel cracking. We elucidated the potential mechanisms involved in the formation of a "structureless" interfacial layer in Fuji II LC by studying the variables of cavity design, surface pre-treatment, water content of the tooth, time for it to develop, early finishing, and coating of the restoration. This layer, the "absorption layer", is probably related to water flux within the maturing cement, depending on environmental moisture changes and communication with the pulp in a wet tooth. The "micropermeability model" was useful in this study of the interfacial characteristics of RM GICs.

[1]  T. Watson,et al.  The Influence of Bur Blade Concentricity on High-speed Tooth-cutting Interactions: A Video-rate Confocal Microscopic Study , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[2]  Mount Gj Some physical and biological properties of glass ionomer cement. , 1995 .

[3]  Hess Ja,et al.  Scanning electron micrographic effects of air-abrasion cavity preparation on human enamel and dentin. , 1995 .

[4]  T. Watson,et al.  Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. , 1995, American journal of dentistry.

[5]  D. Fa,et al.  The effect of airborne particle abrasion on the dentin smear layer and dentin: an in vitro investigation. , 1995 .

[6]  Roger Y. Tsien,et al.  Fluorophores for Confocal Microscopy , 1995 .

[7]  A. Wheeler Saltmarsh development from fen: Analysis of late Holocene deposits from north-central Fenland, U.K. , 1995 .

[8]  K. Laurell,et al.  Scanning electron micrographic effects of air-abrasion cavity preparation on human enamel and dentin. , 1995, Quintessence international.

[9]  F. D. de Wet,et al.  The effect of airborne particle abrasion on the dentin smear layer and dentin: an in vitro investigation. , 1995, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[10]  F. García-Godoy,et al.  Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations: an in vitro study. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  G. Crim Marginal leakage of visible light-cured glass ionomer restorative materials. , 1993, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  S. Sidhu Sealing effectiveness of light-cured glass ionomer cement liners. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  N. McIntyre,et al.  Studies on the Adhesion of Glass-ionomer Cements to Dentin , 1992, Journal of dental research.

[14]  Erickson Rl Surface interactions of dentin adhesive materials. , 1992 .

[15]  J A Williams,et al.  The interfacial region of the tooth/glass ionomer restoration: a confocal optical microscope study. , 1991, American journal of dentistry.

[16]  A Boyde,et al.  Confocal light microscopic techniques for examining dental operative procedures and dental materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. , 1991, American journal of dentistry.

[17]  T F Watson,et al.  A Confocal Microscopic Study of Some Factors Affecting the Adaptation of a Light-cured Glass Ionomer to Tooth Tissue , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[18]  A. Boyde,et al.  Fluorescence in the tandem scanning microscope , 1990, Journal of microscopy.

[19]  T F Watson,et al.  A Confocal Optical Microscope Study of the Morphology of the Tooth/Restoration Interface using Scotchbond 2 Dentin Adhesive , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[20]  C. Davidson,et al.  Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. , 1988, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  A. Boyde,et al.  Tandem scanning reflected light microscopy: applications in clinical dental research. , 1987, Scanning microscopy.

[22]  Alan D. Wilson,et al.  Mechanism of Adhesion of Polyelectrolyte Cements to Hydroxyapatite , 1983, Journal of dental research.

[23]  M. Redstone,et al.  Some physicochemical and biological properties of pH5-protein. , 1962, Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. Kansas Academy of Science.