Mechanical behavior of metastatic femurs through patient-specific computational models accounting for bone-metastasis interaction.

This paper proposes a computational model based on a finite-element formulation for describing the mechanical behavior of femurs affected by metastatic lesions. A novel geometric/constitutive description is introduced by modelling healthy bone and metastases via a linearly poroelastic constitutive approach. A Gaussian-shaped graded transition of material properties between healthy and metastatic tissues is prescribed, in order to account for the bone-metastasis interaction. Loading-induced failure processes are simulated by implementing a progressive damage procedure, formulated via a quasi-static displacement-driven incremental approach, and considering both a stress- and a strain-based failure criterion. By addressing a real clinical case, left and right patient-specific femur models are geometrically reconstructed via an ad-hoc imaging procedure and embedding multiple distributions of metastatic lesions along femurs. Significant differences in fracture loads, fracture mechanisms, and damage patterns, are highlighted by comparing the proposed constitutive description with a purely elastic formulation, where the metastasis is treated as a pseudo-healthy tissue or as a void region. Proposed constitutive description allows to capture stress/strain localization mechanisms within the metastatic tissue, revealing the model capability in describing possible strain-induced mechano-biological stimuli driving onset and evolution of the lesion. The proposed approach opens towards the definition of effective computational strategies for supporting clinical decision and treatments regarding metastatic femurs, contributing also to overcome some limitations of actual standards and procedures.

[1]  D. Chappard,et al.  Bone metastasis: histological changes and pathophysiological mechanisms in osteolytic or osteosclerotic localizations. A review. , 2011, Morphologie : bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes.

[2]  Michele Marino,et al.  Molecular and intermolecular effects in collagen fibril mechanics: a multiscale analytical model compared with atomistic and experimental studies , 2016, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[3]  A. Kiss,et al.  The impact of metastasis on the mineral phase of vertebral bone tissue. , 2017, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[4]  C. Whyne,et al.  Biphasic Material Properties of Lytic Bone Metastases , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  J. Tehranzadeh,et al.  Relationships between material properties and CT scan data of cortical bone with and without metastatic lesions. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  Lena Hirtler,et al.  Effect of simulated metastatic lesions on the biomechanical behavior of the proximal femur , 2017, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  Xi-Qiao Feng,et al.  A nonlinear poroelastic theory of solid tumors with glycosaminoglycan swelling. , 2017, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  S. Scully,et al.  In Brief: Classifications in Brief: Mirels’ Classification: Metastatic Disease in Long Bones and Impending Pathologic Fracture , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  Junghwa Hong,et al.  Development of Pore Pressure Measurement System in Lacunocanalicular Network of Trabeculae Using MEMS Based Micro-Pressure Transducer , 2007 .

[10]  Bang H Hoang,et al.  The Effect of Simulated Metastatic Lytic Lesions on Proximal Femoral Strength , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Glen L Niebur,et al.  Pressure and shear stress in trabecular bone marrow during whole bone loading. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  M Ferrari,et al.  A tumor growth model with deformable ECM , 2014, Physical biology.

[14]  H. Mirels Metastatic Disease in Long Bones A Proposed Scoring System for Diagnosing Impending Pathologic Fractures , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  C. Whyne,et al.  Parametric finite element analysis of vertebral bodies affected by tumors. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  V. Gudnason,et al.  Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans , 2014, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  F. Clauss,et al.  Nanoscale Stiffness Distribution in Bone Metastasis , 2015 .

[18]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  A multiphase model for three-dimensional tumor growth , 2013, New journal of physics.

[19]  W. Taylor,et al.  Physiologically based boundary conditions in finite element modelling. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Pietro Ruggieri,et al.  Management of long bone metastases: recommendations from the Italian Orthopaedic Society bone metastasis study group , 2014, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[21]  C. Milgrom,et al.  Predicting the stiffness and strength of human femurs with real metastatic tumors. , 2014, Bone.

[22]  Jean-François Ganghoffer,et al.  A contribution to the mechanics and thermodynamics of surface growth. Application to bone external remodeling , 2012 .

[23]  Nancy Lane,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of the Proximal Femur and Hip Fracture Risk in Older Men , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[24]  Nicolò Martinelli,et al.  Is endoprosthesis safer than internal fixation for metastatic disease of the proximal femur? A systematic review. , 2017, Injury.

[25]  G. Niebur,et al.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  A chemo-mechano-biological formulation for the effects of biochemical alterations on arterial mechanics: the role of molecular transport and multiscale tissue remodelling , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[28]  H. Skinner,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  In Vitro Modeling of Mechanics in Cancer Metastasis , 2017, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[30]  Harrie Weinans,et al.  Prediction of torsional failure in 22 cadaver femora with and without simulated subtrochanteric metastatic defects: A CT scan-based finite element analysis , 2006, Acta orthopaedica.

[31]  J. D. Humphrey,et al.  A homogenized constrained mixture (and mechanical analog) model for growth and remodeling of soft tissue , 2016, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[32]  K. Radermacher,et al.  Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  Michele Marino,et al.  Influence of inter-molecular interactions on the elasto-damage mechanics of collagen fibrils: A bottom-up approach towards macroscopic tissue modeling , 2014 .

[34]  T. Damron,et al.  Simulating activities of daily living with finite element analysis improves fracture prediction for patients with metastatic femoral lesions , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[35]  L Podshivalov,et al.  3D hierarchical geometric modeling and multiscale FE analysis as a base for individualized medical diagnosis of bone structure. , 2011, Bone.

[36]  D Mitton,et al.  An anatomical subject-specific FE-model for hip fracture load prediction , 2008, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[37]  M. Biot General Theory of Three‐Dimensional Consolidation , 1941 .

[38]  David Taylor How does bone break? , 2003, Nature materials.

[39]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  On Computational Modeling in Tumor Growth , 2013, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.

[40]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[41]  E. Tanck,et al.  Pathological fracture prediction in patients with metastatic lesions can be improved with quantitative computed tomography based computer models. , 2009, Bone.

[42]  W. Hayes,et al.  The effect of impact direction on the structural capacity of the proximal femur during falls , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[43]  Zohar Yosibash,et al.  Predicting the yield of the proximal femur using high-order finite-element analysis with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[44]  F. Taddei,et al.  To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations? , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[45]  W C Hayes,et al.  Local demineralization as a model for bone strength reductions in lytic transcortical metastatic lesions. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[46]  Zohar Yosibash,et al.  Patient-specific finite element analysis of the human femur--a double-blinded biomechanical validation. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  Oumou Goundiam,et al.  Study of cancer cell survival using an anti-adhesive substratum , 2008 .

[48]  A. Vaziri,et al.  Biomechanics and mechanobiology of trabecular bone: a review. , 2015, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[49]  Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos,et al.  The role of mechanical forces in tumor growth and therapy. , 2014, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[50]  C J Cyron,et al.  Growth and remodeling of load-bearing biological soft tissues , 2016, Meccanica.

[51]  P. Cripton,et al.  Proximal femur bone strength estimated by a computationally fast finite element analysis in a sideways fall configuration. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[52]  Sebahattin Bektas,et al.  LEAST SQUARES FITTING OF ELLIPSOID USING ORTHOGONAL DISTANCES , 2015 .

[53]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women. , 2014, Bone.

[54]  C. Whyne,et al.  Effects of tumor location, shape and surface serration on burst fracture risk in the metastatic spine. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[55]  F. Taddei,et al.  Can CT image deblurring improve finite element predictions at the proximal femur? , 2016, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[56]  Theo H Smit,et al.  Estimation of the poroelastic parameters of cortical bone. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[57]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone , 2003, Nature materials.

[58]  W C Hayes,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone within and adjacent to osseous metastases , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[59]  Cesare Faldini,et al.  Full-field in vitro investigation of hard and soft tissue strain in the spine by means of Digital Image Correlation. , 2017, Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal.

[60]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[61]  Nico Verdonschot,et al.  Towards clinical application of biomechanical tools for the prediction of fracture risk in metastatic bone disease. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[62]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[63]  B. Snyder,et al.  CT-based Structural Rigidity Analysis Is More Accurate Than Mirels Scoring for Fracture Prediction in Metastatic Femoral Lesions , 2016, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[64]  Zohar Yosibash,et al.  Pathological fracture risk assessment in patients with femoral metastases using CT-based finite element methods. A retrospective clinical study. , 2018, Bone.

[65]  A. Piccioli,et al.  PATHOLOGIC AND IMPENDING FRACTURES: BIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL ASPECTS. , 2015, Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents.

[66]  Luca Cristofolini,et al.  The Size of Simulated Lytic Metastases Affects the Strain Distribution on the Anterior Surface of the Vertebra. , 2018, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[67]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Direct and inverse identification of constitutive parameters from the structure of soft tissues. Part 1: micro- and nanostructure of collagen fibers , 2018, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[68]  Cari M Whyne,et al.  Diffusion-Tensor Imaging Versus Digitization in Reconstructing the Masseter Architecture. , 2018, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[69]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Patient-specific finite element estimated femur strength as a predictor of the risk of hip fracture: the effect of methodological determinants , 2016, Osteoporosis International.

[70]  P. Clézardin,et al.  Pathophysiology of bone metastases from solid malignancies. , 2017, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[71]  L Cristofolini,et al.  Influence of thigh muscles on the axial strains in a proximal femur during early stance in gait. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[72]  Dieter H. Pahr,et al.  The insufficiencies of risk analysis of impending pathological fractures in patients with femoral metastases: A literature review☆ , 2016, Bone reports.

[73]  J H Keyak,et al.  Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[74]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[75]  Jamshid Tehranzadeh,et al.  Predicting Proximal Femoral Strength Using Structural Engineering Models , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[76]  F. Taddei,et al.  Left–right differences in the proximal femur’s strength of post-menopausal women: a multicentric finite element study , 2016, Osteoporosis International.

[77]  B. Snyder,et al.  Bone Volume Fraction Explains the Variation in Strength and Stiffness of Cancellous Bone Affected by Metastatic Cancer and Osteoporosis , 2008, Calcified Tissue International.

[78]  N Verdonschot,et al.  The assessment of the risk of fracture in femora with metastatic lesions: comparing case-specific finite element analyses with predictions by clinical experts. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[79]  Evan T Keller,et al.  Tumor-induced pressure in the bone microenvironment causes osteocytes to promote the growth of prostate cancer bone metastases. , 2015, Cancer research.

[80]  V. Gudnason,et al.  Male-female differences in the association between incident hip fracture and proximal femoral strength: a finite element analysis study. , 2011, Bone.

[81]  Sebahattin Bektas ORTHOGONAL DISTANCE FROM AN ELLIPSOID , 2014 .