Distinction between arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic death after acute myocardial infarction based on heart rate variability, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVES We investigated whether heart rate variability, the signal-averaged electrocardiogram (ECG), ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular ejection fraction predict the mechanism of cardiac death after myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND Postinfarction risk stratification studies have almost exclusively focused on predicting the risk of arrhythmic death. The factors that identify and distinguish persons at risk for arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic death are poorly known. METHODS Heart rate variability, the signal-averaged ECG, ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular ejection fraction were assessed in 575 survivors of acute myocardial infarction. The patients were followed up for 2 years; arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic cardiac deaths were used as clinical end points. During the follow-up period, 47 cardiac deaths occurred, 29 (62%) arrhythmic and 18 (38%) nonarrhythmic. RESULTS All risk factors were associated with cardiac mortality in univariate analysis. With the exception of left ventricular ejection fraction, they were also predictors of arrhythmic death. Depressed heart rate variability (p < 0.001), ventricular ectopic beats (p < 0.001) and low ejection fraction (p < 0.001) were related to nonarrhythmic death. In multivariate analysis, depressed heart rate variability (p < 0.001) and runs of ventricular tachycardia (p < 0.05) predicted arrhythmic death. Nonarrhythmic death was associated with depressed heart rate variability (p < 0.001), ventricular ectopic beats (p < 0.001) and low ejection fraction (p < 0.01). By selecting patients with depressed heart rate variability, long filtered QRS duration or ventricular arrhythmias and excluding patients with the lowest ejection fraction, we identified a group in which 75% of deaths were arrhythmic. Similarly, by selecting patients with a low ejection fraction and excluding patients with the lowest heart rate variability, we identified a group in which 75% of deaths were nonarrhythmic. CONCLUSIONS Arrhythmic death was associated predominantly with depressed heart rate variability and ventricular tachycardia runs, and nonarrhythmic death with low ejection fraction, ventricular ectopic beats and depressed heart rate variability. A combination of risk factors identified patient groups in which a majority of deaths were either arrhythmic or nonarrhythmic.

[1]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Prevalence, characteristics and significance of ventricular tachycardia detected by 24-hour continuous electrocardiographic recordings in the late hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  H L Greene,et al.  Classification of deaths after myocardial infarction as arrhythmic or nonarrhythmic (the Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study). , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Time course of recovery of heart period variability after myocardial infarction. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Weir,et al.  The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial Investigators: Preliminary Report: Effect of Encainide and Flecainide on Mortality in a Randomized Trial of Arrhythmia Suppression After Myocardial Infarction. , 1990 .

[5]  S L Winters,et al.  A new noninvasive index to predict sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in the first year after myocardial infarction: based on signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ejection fraction and Holter monitoring. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  N. Sammel,et al.  Late potentials detected after myocardial infarction: natural history and prognostic significance. , 1986, Circulation.

[7]  J P Miller,et al.  The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction. , 1984, Circulation.

[8]  D L Ross,et al.  Prognostic significance of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation induced at programmed stimulation and delayed potentials detected on the signal-averaged electrocardiograms of survivors of acute myocardial infarction. , 1986, Circulation.

[9]  A J Camm,et al.  Prognostic value of baroreflex sensitivity testing after acute myocardial infarction. , 1992, British heart journal.

[10]  H Sandler,et al.  The use of single plane angiocardiograms for the calculation of left ventricular volume in man. , 1968, American heart journal.

[11]  K. Byth,et al.  What Is the Best Predictor of Spontaneous Ventricular Tachycardia and Sudden Death After Myocardial Infarction? , 1991, Circulation.

[12]  A. Moss,et al.  Survivorship patterns in the posthospital phase of myocardial infarction. , 1979, Circulation.

[13]  A. Camm,et al.  Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in postinfarction patients based on heart rate variability, ambulatory electrocardiographic variables and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 1996 .

[15]  M. Simson.  Use of Signals in the Terminal QRS Complex to Identify Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction , 1981, Circulation.

[16]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Proposal for a simple synthesis prognostic staging system in chronic myelogenous leukemia. , 1990, The American journal of medicine.

[18]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Predicting arrhythmic events after acute myocardial infarction using the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  B. Pitt,et al.  Sudden death in the year following myocardial infarction. Relation to ventricular premature contractions in the late hospitals phase and left ventricular ejection fraction. , 1977, The American journal of medicine.

[20]  W. Rogers,et al.  Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  O Odemuyiwa,et al.  Comparison of the predictive characteristics of heart rate variability index and left ventricular ejection fraction for all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events and sudden death after acute myocardial infarction. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  S Cerutti,et al.  Heart rate variability as an index of sympathovagal interaction after acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  E. Caref,et al.  Risk stratification and management of patients with organic heart disease and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: role of programmed stimulation, left ventricular ejection fraction, and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1990, The American journal of medicine.

[24]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .

[25]  T. Cesario.  Introduction—Cardiovascular disease in the elderly: Etiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment , 1989 .

[26]  J. Miller,et al.  Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  A J Camm,et al.  Baroreflex sensitivity and electrophysiological correlates in patients after acute myocardial infarction. , 1991, Circulation.

[28]  P. Schwartz,et al.  Baroreflex sensitivity, clinical correlates, and cardiovascular mortality among patients with a first myocardial infarction. A prospective study. , 1988, Circulation.

[29]  J. Fleiss,et al.  The ability of several short-term measures of RR variability to predict mortality after myocardial infarction. , 1993, Circulation.