An Ecological Risk Assessment Methodology for Screening Discharge Alternatives of Produced Water

ABSTRACT Previous studies on Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) of produced water relied on the use of deterministic hydrodynamic models. The assessment was usually carried out in the North Sea context using a model such as the Chemical Hazard Assessment and Risk Management (CHARM), or in the North American context based on the output of a hydrodynamic model such as the Cornell Mixing Zone Expert System (CORMIX). In both these cases, however, probabilistic analysis has not been employed, particularly, to account for uncertainty associated with hydrodynamic models in the ERA study. In fact, it is the hydrodynamic model that has a direct linkage to the selection of the discharge alternatives. Apart from the monitoring purposes, in this article, it is suggested that criteria for evaluating discharge alternatives of produced water in a marine environment might incorporate an awareness of ecological risks by incorporating engineering and toxicological aspects. An ERA methodology consisting of problem formulation, analysis, and risk characterization is discussed in light of evaluating the discharge alternatives. A probabilistic analysis using Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS)–based Monte Carlo (MC) simulations was employed. A depiction of associated risks for an area comparable to a regulatory mixing zone of typical effluent discharges is presented.

[1]  A. M. Riddle,et al.  Modelling the uncertainties in predicting produced water concentrations in the North Sea , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  C. C. Karman,et al.  Ecotoxicological Risk of Produced Water Discharged From Oil Production Platforms in the Statfjord and Gullfaks Field , 1996 .

[3]  Leonard M. Lye,et al.  A new approach to modelling initial dilution of a buoyancy-dominated jet in moving water , 2002 .

[4]  K.A. Gamache,et al.  Oceanographic DataLink , 1999, Oceans '99. MTS/IEEE. Riding the Crest into the 21st Century. Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37008).

[5]  Mukhtasor Hydrodynamic modeling and ecological risk-based design of produced water discharge from an offshore platform , 2001 .

[6]  S. Johnsen,et al.  Toxicity Testing and Chemical Characterization of Produced Water — A Preliminary Study , 1992 .

[7]  L. M. LYE,et al.  Methods of Compliance Evaluation for Ocean Outfall Design and Analysis , 2002, Environmental management.

[8]  A. F. Meinhold,et al.  Produced water discharges to the Gulf of Mexico: Background information for ecological risk assessments , 1996 .

[9]  G W Suter Generic assessment endpoints are needed for ecological risk assessment. , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Gerhard H. Jirka,et al.  Buoyant spreading processes in pollutant transport and mixing Part 1: Lateral spreading with ambient current advection , 1994 .

[11]  Craig W. Osenberg,et al.  Spatial Scale of Ecological Effects Associated with an Open Coast Discharge of Produced Water , 1992 .

[12]  J. W. Anderson,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Produced Water Toxicity , 1992 .

[13]  Norman H. Brooks,et al.  Diffusion of sewage effluent in an ocean-current , 1960 .

[14]  Gerhard H. Jirka,et al.  Expert System for Hydrodynamic Mixing Zone Analysis of Conventional and Toxic Submerged Single Port Discharges (CORMIX1) , 1990 .

[15]  Maynard G. Brandsma,et al.  Dispersion Modeling Perspectives on the Environmental Fate of Produced Water Discharges , 1996 .

[16]  H.P.M. Schobben,et al.  Probabilistic methods for marine ecological risk assessment , 1993 .

[17]  Mark Reed,et al.  Produced water 2 : environmental issues and mitigation technologies , 1997 .

[18]  Hening Huang,et al.  A Model for Surface Plume Dispersion in an Ocean Current , 1997 .

[19]  Steven J. Wright,et al.  Surface dilution of round submerged buoyant jets , 1991 .

[20]  A. F. Meinhold,et al.  Final Report: Risk assessment for produced water discharges to Louisiana open bays , 1996 .

[21]  C. C Karman,et al.  The Role of Time in Environmental Risk Assessment , 2000 .

[22]  A. O. Tyler,et al.  Environmental Impact of Produced Waters in the Java Sea, Indonesia , 1996 .

[23]  Hening Huang,et al.  Probabilistic Analysis of Ocean Outfall Mixing Zones , 1996 .

[24]  C. C. Karman,et al.  Dynamic assessment of the ecological risk of the discharge of produced water from oil and gas producing platforms , 1998 .

[25]  Scott E. Belanger,et al.  Understanding single‐species and model ecosystem sensitivity: Data‐based comparison , 1999 .

[26]  R. A. Efroymson,et al.  Waste area grouping 2 Phase I task data report: Ecological risk assessment and White Oak Creek watershed screening ecological risk assessment , 1996 .

[27]  Philip B. Dorn,et al.  Short-Term Chronic Toxicity of Produced Water and its Variability as a Function of Sample Time and Discharge Rate , 1992 .

[28]  J. Neff,et al.  Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Produced Water , 1996 .

[29]  R. R. Stephenson,et al.  Environmental effect of produced water from North Sea oil operations , 1987 .

[30]  C. Karman,et al.  Ecotoxicological risk assessment related to chemicals and pollutants in off-shore oil production. , 2000, Toxicology letters.

[31]  T. C. Sauer,et al.  Chemical and Toxicological Characterization of Produced Water Freon Extracts , 1992 .

[32]  A. F. Meinhold,et al.  Risk Assessment for Produced Water Discharges to Open Bays in Louisiana , 1996 .

[33]  J. M. Marquenie,et al.  Produced Water Discharges From Gas/Condensate Platforms: Environmental Considerations , 1991 .