Personality judgments from everyday images of faces

People readily make personality attributions to images of strangers' faces. Here we investigated the basis of these personality attributions as made to everyday, naturalistic face images. In a first study, we used 1000 highly varying “ambient image” face photographs to test the correspondence between personality judgments of the Big Five and dimensions known to underlie a range of facial first impressions: approachability, dominance, and youthful-attractiveness. Interestingly, the facial Big Five judgments were found to separate to some extent: judgments of openness, extraversion, emotional stability, and agreeableness were mainly linked to facial first impressions of approachability, whereas conscientiousness judgments involved a combination of approachability and dominance. In a second study we used average face images to investigate which main cues are used by perceivers to make impressions of the Big Five, by extracting consistent cues to impressions from the large variation in the original images. When forming impressions of strangers from highly varying, naturalistic face photographs, perceivers mainly seem to rely on broad facial cues to approachability, such as smiling.

[1]  G. Rhodes.  The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[3]  G. Lutz.  The Electoral Success of Beauties and Beasts , 2010 .

[4]  L. R. Goldberg.  The structure of phenotypic personality traits. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[5]  D. Watson,et al.  Asymmetry in judgments of personality: others are less differentiated than the self. , 2008, Journal of personality.

[6]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Posing personality: Is it possible to enact the Big Five traits in photographs? , 2013 .

[8]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[9]  J. M. Digman.  Higher-order factors of the Big Five. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  C. DeYoung.  Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. , 1979 .

[12]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  The five-factor model of personality : theoretical perspectives , 1996 .

[13]  Terry A. Beehr,et al.  Effects of applicant sex, applicant physical attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decisions* , 1986 .

[14]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Bernard Tiddeman,et al.  Prototyping and Transforming Facial Textures for Perception Research , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[16]  R. Ward,et al.  Different Signals of Personality and Health from the Two Sides of the Face , 2011, Perception.

[17]  D. Perrett,et al.  Using composite images to assess accuracy in personality attribution to faces. , 2007, British journal of psychology.

[18]  C. Borch,et al.  ABOUT FACE: THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN FACIAL APPEARANCE AND STATUS ATTAINMENT AMONG MILITARY PERSONNEL , 2011 .

[19]  Xiaolan Yang.  The role of photographs in online peer-to-peer lending behavior , 2014 .

[20]  E. Brunswik.  Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments , 1957 .

[21]  John Antonakis,et al.  Predicting Elections: Child's Play! , 2009, Science.

[22]  Andrew W. Young,et al.  Exploring the perception of social characteristics in faces using the isolation effect , 2005 .

[23]  D. Perrett,et al.  Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a "kernel of truth" in social perception , 2006 .

[24]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Personality in Perspective: Judgmental Consistency across Orientations of the Face , 2009, Perception.

[25]  O. John,et al.  Big Five Inventory , 2012, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[26]  E. Thorndike.  A constant error in psychological ratings. , 1920 .

[27]  G. Āllport,et al.  Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. , 1936 .

[28]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[29]  A. Todorov,et al.  Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes , 2005, Science.

[30]  R. Ward,et al.  Signals of personality and health: the contributions of facial shape, skin texture, and viewing angle. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Brian R. Baucom,et al.  Psychological Trauma : Theory , Research , Practice , and Policy Validation of the Five-Factor Model of PTSD Symptom Structure Among Delinquent Youth , 2015 .

[32]  Andrew W Young,et al.  Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated. , 2015, British journal of psychology.

[33]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[34]  Jonathan Westley Peirce,et al.  Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy , 2008, Front. Neuroinform..

[35]  Lance A. Young,et al.  Trust and Credit: The Role of Appearance in Peer-to-peer Lending , 2012 .

[36]  R. Ward,et al.  Internal Facial Features are Signals of Personality and Health , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  A. Burton,et al.  Mental representations of familiar faces. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[38]  Ron Dotsch,et al.  Warmth and competence in your face! Visual encoding of stereotype content , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[39]  A. Todorov,et al.  Misleading First Impressions , 2014, Psychological science.

[40]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Portraits made to measure: manipulating social judgments about individuals with a statistical face model. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[41]  A. Young,et al.  Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Andrew W. Young,et al.  Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model , 2013, Cognition.

[43]  A. Young,et al.  Inferring social attributes from different face regions: Evidence for holistic processing , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  Clare A. M. Sutherland,et al.  A basic guide to Psychomorph , 2015 .

[45]  Julian A. Oldmeadow,et al.  Facial Stereotype Visualization Through Image Averaging , 2013 .

[46]  Juliane M. Stopfer,et al.  Facebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not Self-Idealization , 2010, Psychological science.

[47]  Andrew W Young,et al.  Effects of Inversion and Negation on Social Inferences from Faces , 2008, Perception.

[48]  Nalini Ambady,et al.  Personality impressions from identity claims on Facebook. , 2012 .

[49]  A. Todorov,et al.  The functional basis of face evaluation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  D. Southern,et al.  Strangers ' Ratings of the Five Robust Personality Factors : Evidence of a Surprising Convergence With Self-Report , 2001 .

[51]  A. Burton,et al.  Variability in photos of the same face , 2011, Cognition.

[52]  S. Gosling,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Personality Judgments Based on Physical Appearance Personality Judgments Based on Physical Appearance , 2022 .

[53]  Peter Mende-Siedlecki,et al.  Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.