Assessment of left ventricular mass and volumes by three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with or without wall motion abnormalities: comparison against cine magnetic resonance imaging

Aim: To evaluate if three-dimensional echocardiography (3-DE) is as accurate and reproducible as cine magnetic resonance imaging (cMR) in estimating left ventricular (LV) parameters in patients with and without wall motion abnormalities (WMA). Methods: 83 patients (33 with WMA) underwent 3-DE and cMR. 3-DE datasets were analysed using a semi-automatic contour detection algorithm. The accuracy of 3-DE was tested against cMR in the two groups of patients. All measurements were made twice by two different observers. Results: LV mass by 3-DE was similar to that obtained by cMR (149 (SD 42) g vs 148 (45) g, p = 0.67), with small bias (1 (28) g) and excellent interobserver agreement (−2 (31) g vs 4 (26) g). The two measurements were also highly correlated (r = 0.94), irrespective of WMA. End-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes and ejection fraction by 3-DE and cMR were highly correlated (r = 0.97, 0.98, 0.94, respectively). Yet, 3-DE underestimated cMR end-diastolic volumes (167 (68) ml vs 187 (70) ml, p<0.001) and end-systolic volumes (88 (56) ml vs 101 (65) ml, p<0.001), but yielded similar ejection fractions (50% (14%) vs 50% (16%), p = 0.23). Conclusion: 3-DE permits accurate determination of LV mass and volumes irrespective of the presence or absence of WMA. LV parameters obtained by 3-DE are also as reproducible as those obtained by cMR. This suggests that 3-DE can be used to follow up patients with LV hypertrophy and/or remodelling.

[1]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Rapid online quantification of left ventricular volume from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic data. , 2006, European heart journal.

[2]  M. Simoons,et al.  Real-time transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction in congenital heart disease. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[3]  O. Gérard,et al.  Efficient model-based quantification of left ventricular function in 3-D echocardiography , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Roberto M. Lang,et al.  Volumetric Quantification of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Function From Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Images , 2005, Circulation.

[5]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Size and Function: Side-by-Side Comparison of Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography and Computed Tomography With Magnetic Resonance Reference , 2006, Circulation.

[6]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Improved semiautomated quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using 3-dimensional echocardiography with a full matrix-array transducer: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[7]  Jonathan Chan,et al.  Accuracy and feasibility of online 3-dimensional echocardiography for measurement of left ventricular parameters. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[8]  Raimund Erbel,et al.  Partial cut-off of the left ventricle: determinants and effects on volume parameters assessed by real-time 3-D echocardiography. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  R M Whitlock,et al.  Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. , 1987, Circulation.

[10]  T. Marwick,et al.  Reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular parameters using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Jonathan Chan,et al.  What is the optimal clinical technique for measurement of left ventricular volume after myocardial infarction? A comparative study of 3-dimensional echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[12]  Dudley J Pennell,et al.  Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  Preoperative identification of patients likely to have left ventricular dysfunction after aortic valve replacement. Participants in the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease. , 1989, Circulation.

[14]  Jonathan Chan,et al.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional echocardiography with sequential magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating left ventricular volume and ejection fraction over time in patients with healed myocardial infarction. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Fast Measurement of Left Ventricular Mass With Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Circulation.

[16]  A. E. van den Bosch,et al.  Comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography to magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of left ventricular mass. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  Dudley J Pennell,et al.  Left Ventricular Mass: Reliability of M-Mode and 2-Dimensional Echocardiographic Formulas , 2002, Hypertension.

[18]  D. Ferguson,et al.  Sympathoinhibitory responses to digitalis glycosides in heart failure patients. Direct evidence from sympathetic neural recordings. , 1989, Circulation.

[19]  N Reichek,et al.  Echocardiographic Determination of Left Ventricular Mass in Man: Anatomic Validation of the Method , 1977, Circulation.

[20]  B. McCrindle,et al.  Superiority of 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular volume assessment in small piglet hearts. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[21]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[22]  C. Visser,et al.  Early identification of left ventricular remodelling after myocardial infarction, assessed by transthoracic 3D echocardiography. , 2004, European heart journal.

[23]  P. Hanrath,et al.  M-mode echocardiography overestimates left ventricular mass in patients with normal left ventricular shape: a comparative study using three-dimensional echocardiography. , 2003, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[24]  J. Gottdiener,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging compared to echocardiography to assess left ventricular mass in the hypertensive patient. , 1995, American journal of hypertension.

[25]  Yasuhiko Takemoto,et al.  Comparison of accurate measurement of left ventricular mass in patients with hypertrophied hearts by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography versus magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Three-dimensional echocardiography: the benefits of the additional dimension. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  J. Cohn,et al.  Echocardiographic Variables as Prognostic Indicators and Therapeutic Monitors in Chronic Congestive Heart Failure Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies V‐HeFT I and II , 1993, Circulation.

[28]  F J Ten Cate,et al.  Measurements and day-to-day variabilities of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  A H Zwinderman,et al.  The athlete's heart. A meta-analysis of cardiac structure and function. , 2000, Circulation.