[A retrospective analysis of functional and oncologic outcomes following surgical treatment of patients with pT1/pT2 renal cell carcinoma at a tertiary referral centre].

INTRODUCTION  In patients with localised renal cell carcinoma, the only curative treatment option is surgical tumour excision. The aim of this study was to evaluate peri- and postoperative outcomes as well as oncologic and functional long-term results following surgical treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (pT1/pT2) at a tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS  This retrospective study included a total of 758 patients with localised renal cell carcinoma (pT1 /pT2), who underwent radical (RN) or partial (PN) nephrectomy between 01/2008 and 10/2014. Pre-, peri- and postoperative parameters were recorded. Oncologic and functional long-term data were retrieved through questionnaires and structured telephone interviews. RESULTS  Laparoscopic RN or PN resulted in less blood loss and lower peri- and postoperative complication rates compared to open procedures. Regarding short- and long-term renal function, a higher increase in serum creatinine levels was detected after RN. No difference was noted in health status and quality of life. Median follow-up was 36 months. A total of 10.4 % of patients died during follow-up. 4.7 % and 8.4 % developed a relapse or metastatic disease. No difference was found between laparoscopic and open RN/PNs in terms of oncologic long-term results. DISCUSSION  In conclusion, all surgical techniques evaluated in this study provided good oncologic and functional short-/long-term outcomes.

[1]  K. Rha,et al.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, European urology.

[2]  Lorenzo Marconi,et al.  EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. , 2010, European urology.

[3]  W. Rathmell,et al.  Renal cell carcinoma , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  B. Lane,et al.  10-year oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[5]  M. Lapitan,et al.  Systematic review of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. , 2012, European urology.

[6]  J. McKiernan,et al.  Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of stage T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA: a propensity scoring approach , 2012, BJU international.

[7]  M. Lapitan,et al.  Systematic review of oncological outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. , 2012, European urology.

[8]  M. Carini,et al.  Elective partial nephrectomy is equivalent to radical nephrectomy in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: results of a retrospective, comparative, multi‐institutional study , 2012, BJU international.

[9]  Hyung Joon Kim,et al.  Perioperative and renal function outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for T1b and T2a kidney tumors. , 2012, Journal of endourology.

[10]  P. Russo,et al.  Comparison of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4-7 centimeters. , 2012, European urology.

[11]  Walter Artibani,et al.  Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. , 2009, European urology.

[12]  Robert G Uzzo,et al.  The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[13]  M. Bader,et al.  Quality of life and perioperative outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN), open RN and nephron‐sparing surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma , 2009, BJU international.

[14]  S. Madersbacher,et al.  Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients. , 2009, European urology.

[15]  A. Shalhav,et al.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy in clinical T1a renal tumors. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[16]  F. Porpiglia,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: analysis of the current literature. , 2008, European urology.

[17]  Louis R Kavoussi,et al.  Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[18]  R. Sylvester,et al.  A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. , 2007, European urology.

[19]  A. Hemal,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[20]  U. Witzsch,et al.  Quality of life after surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: comparison between radical nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery. , 2003, Urology.

[21]  N. Rioux-Leclercq,et al.  Prognostic significance of the mode of detection in renal tumours , 2002, BJU international.

[22]  R. Figlin,et al.  Renal cell carcinoma: prognostic significance of incidentally detected tumors. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[23]  R. Clayman,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[24]  M. D'armiento,et al.  Elective conservative surgery for renal carcinoma versus radical nephrectomy: a prospective study. , 1997, British journal of urology.