The speed of object recognition from a haptic glance: event-related potential evidence.

Recognition of an object usually involves a wide range of sensory inputs. Accumulating evidence shows that first brain responses associated with the visual discrimination of objects emerge around 150 ms, but fewer studies have been devoted to measure the first neural signature of haptic recognition. To investigate the speed of haptic processing, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) during a shape discrimination task without visual information. After a restricted exploratory procedure, participants (n = 27) were instructed to judge whether the touched object corresponded to an expected object whose name had been previously presented in a screen. We encountered that any incongruence between the presented word and the shape of the object evoked a frontocentral negativity starting at ∼175 ms. With the use of source analysis and L2 minimum-norm estimation, the neural sources of this differential activity were located in higher level somatosensory areas and prefrontal regions involved in error monitoring and cognitive control. Our findings reveal that the somatosensory system is able to complete an amount of haptic processing substantial enough to trigger conflict-related responses in medial and prefrontal cortices in <200 ms. The present results show that our haptic system is a fast recognition device closely interlinked with error- and conflict-monitoring processes.

[1]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects from a haptic glance , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  T. Hendler,et al.  Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Coupling electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses to errors , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Shy Shoham,et al.  Neural substrates of tactile object recognition: An fMRI study , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Per E. Roland,et al.  Somatosensory detection of microgeometry, macrogeometry and kinesthesia in man , 1987, Brain Research Reviews.

[8]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[9]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  C. Braun,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Following Incorrect Feedback in a Time-Estimation Task: Evidence for a Generic Neural System for Error Detection , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Y. Iwamura Hierarchical somatosensory processing , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  R. Knight,et al.  Gating of somatosensory input by human prefrontal cortex , 1990, Brain Research.

[13]  David P. Friedman,et al.  Cortical connections of the somatosensory fields of the lateral sulcus of macaques: Evidence for a corticolimbic pathway for touch , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  K. Zilles,et al.  Hierarchical Processing of Tactile Shape in the Human Brain , 2001, Neuron.

[15]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[16]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Structure of Receptive Fields in Area 3b of Primary Somatosensory Cortex in the Alert Monkey , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[18]  R. Romo,et al.  Frequency discrimination in the sense of flutter: psychophysical measurements correlated with postcentral events in behaving monkeys , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  Christian Bohm,et al.  Somatosensory Discrimination of Shape: Tactile Exploration and Cerebral Activation , 1991, The European journal of neuroscience.

[20]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[21]  C. C. Wood,et al.  The ɛ-Adjustment Procedure for Repeated-Measures Analyses of Variance , 1976 .

[22]  M J Farah,et al.  Tactile agnosia. Underlying impairment and implications for normal tactile object recognition. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  R. Caselli,et al.  Rediscovering tactile agnosia. , 1991, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[24]  H Burton,et al.  Neuronal activity in the second somatosensory cortex of monkeys (Macaca mulatta) during active touch of gratings. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  R. Malach,et al.  Cortical activity during tactile exploration of objects in blind and sighted humans. , 2010, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[26]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Connections of the ventral granular frontal cortex of macaques with perisylvian premotor and somatosensory areas: Anatomical evidence for somatic representation in primate frontal association cortex , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects by touch: An “expert system” , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  J Hyvärinen,et al.  Movement‐sensitive and direction and orientation‐selective cutaneous receptive fields in the hand area of the post‐central gyrus in monkeys. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  J Hyvärinen,et al.  Receptive field integration and submodality convergence in the hand area of the post‐central gyrus of the alert monkey. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  Michio Tanaka,et al.  Postcentral neurons in hand region of area 2: their possible role in the form discrimination of tactile objects , 1978, Brain Research.

[31]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Flutter Discrimination: neural codes, perception, memory and decision making , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  K. Zilles,et al.  t Object Shape Differences Reflected by Somatosensory Cortical Activation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Time Course of Error Detection and Correction in Humans: Neurophysiological Evidence , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Josep Marco-Pallarés,et al.  Neural Mechanisms Underlying Adaptive Actions after Slips , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  Amir Amedi,et al.  A Putative Model of Multisensory Object Representation , 2009, Brain Topography.

[36]  G. Romani,et al.  Auditory evoked magnetic fields and electric potentials , 1990 .

[37]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Beneficial effects of word final stress in segmenting a new language: evidence from ERPs , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[39]  L Krubitzer,et al.  Area 3a: topographic organization and cortical connections in marmoset monkeys. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  R. J. Seitz,et al.  A fronto‐parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI‐study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[41]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[42]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Error-related scalp potentials elicited by hand and foot movements: evidence for an output-independent error-processing system in humans , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[43]  C C Wood,et al.  Letter: The epsilon-adjustment procedure for repeated-measures analyses of variance. , 1976, Psychophysiology.

[44]  B. P. McCloskey,et al.  Knowledge about hand shaping and knowledge about objects. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[45]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[46]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  J.C. Mosher,et al.  Recursive MUSIC: A framework for EEG and MEG source localization , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  P. Roland,et al.  Shape and roughness activate different somatosensory areas in the human brain. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  T. James,et al.  The neural basis of haptic object processing. , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[50]  Rüdiger J. Seitz,et al.  A fronto-parietal circuit for tactile object discrimination: an event-related fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[51]  S. Carlson,et al.  A segregated neural pathway for prefrontal top-down control of tactile discrimination. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[53]  G. Ettlinger,et al.  Impaired tactile learning and retention after removals of the second somatic sensory projection cortex (SII) in the monkey , 1976, Brain Research.