The sustainability of timber production from Eastern Amazonian forests

Abstract Although the regulations are imperfectly enforced, logging firms in the Brazilian Amazon are subject to forest management regulations intended to reduce environmental damage and protect future forest productivity. Additionally, voluntary best practices firms adopt to achieve environmental performance that exceed regulatory requirements are largely limited to reduced impact logging (RIL) systems that reduce harvest damage relative to conventional logging systems used by a large majority of firms in the region. Existing regulations combined with best practices may not be adequate to ensure sustained yields. This inadequacy is an important issue as Brazil implements an ambitious program of forest concessions on public lands. We analyze the profitability and environmental outcomes of best logging practices and proposed sustainability requirements. We propose two operational definitions of sustainability (the first focusing on sustaining stand-level timber volumes and the other focusing on sustaining species-level volumes within the stand) based on sustaining timber inventories across cutting cycles rather than on sustaining overall harvest yields. RIL is shown to be profitable for loggers and increase the timber available for future harvests. While volume predicted to be available for the second and third harvests are significantly lower than the available timber in the unlogged forest, the second and third harvests are projected to be profitable and have the potential for sustainability despite high opportunity costs. However, as harvesting is repeated into the future, results show the composition of the harvest shifts from higher-value shade-tolerant and emergent species toward a greater reliance on longer-lived, lower-value pioneer species. This shift may create pressure to expand the forest base under management in order to continue to supply high-value species or increase the risk of timber trespass in conservation units and areas under community or indigenous management.

[1]  D. Dykstra Reduced impact logging: concepts and issues , 2002 .

[2]  B. B. Walters,et al.  Constraints and opportunities for better silvicultural practice in tropical forestry: an interdisciplinary approach , 2005 .

[3]  N. D. Graaf,et al.  Pioneer and climax tree regeneration following selective logging with silviculture in Suriname , 2003 .

[4]  D. Carter,et al.  Financial returns under uncertainty for conventional and reduced-impact logging in permanent production forests of the Brazilian Amazon , 2001 .

[5]  Denis Valle,et al.  Identifying bias in stand-level growth and yield estimations: A case study in eastern Brazilian Amazonia , 2006 .

[6]  A. Veríssimo,et al.  Fatos Florestais da Amazônia 2003 , 2003 .

[7]  Denis Valle,et al.  Adaptation of a spatially explicit individual tree-based growth and yield model and long-term comparison between reduced-impact and conventional logging in eastern Amazonia, Brazil , 2007 .

[8]  L. Rodriguez,et al.  Profitability and social impacts of reduced impact logging in the Tapajós National Forest, Brazil — A case study , 2007 .

[9]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Simulating options for carbon sequestration through improved management of a lowland tropical rainforest , 1997, Environment and Development Economics.

[10]  Dennis P. Dykstra,et al.  Why Poor Logging Practices Persist in the Tropics , 2000 .

[11]  Christopher Uhl,et al.  Logging damage during planned and unplanned logging operations in the eastern Amazon , 1996 .

[12]  James Grogan,et al.  How rare is too rare to harvest? Management challenges posed by timber species occurring at low densities in the Brazilian Amazon , 2008 .

[13]  Paulo Barreto,et al.  Financial and ecological indicators of reduced impact logging performance in the eastern Amazon , 2002 .

[14]  M. Cochrane,et al.  Priority Areas for Establishing National Forests in the Brazilian Amazon , 2002 .

[15]  Alexander J. Macpherson,et al.  A Model for comparing reduced impact logging with conventional logging for an Eastern Amazonian Forest , 2010 .

[16]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Industrial development on logging frontiers in the Brazilian Amazon , 2006 .

[17]  J. Chave,et al.  Towards a Worldwide Wood Economics Spectrum 2 . L E a D I N G D I M E N S I O N S I N W O O D F U N C T I O N , 2022 .

[18]  N. Picard,et al.  Sustainable cutting cycle and yields in a lowland mixed dipterocarp forest of Borneo , 2003 .

[19]  Multinomial logit estimation of a matrix growth model for tropical dry forests of eastern Bolivia , 2006 .

[20]  J. Vincent,et al.  Promoting Better Logging Practices in Tropical Forests , 1998 .

[21]  J. Zweede,et al.  Liberation: Acceptable production of tropical forest timber , 2006 .

[22]  G. Man,et al.  Applying reduced impact logging to advance sustainable forest management: international conference proceedings 26 February to 1 March 2001, Kuching, Malaysia , 2002 .

[23]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Modelling Forest Growth and Yield: Applications to Mixed Tropical Forests , 1994 .

[24]  N. Picard,et al.  Grouping species for predicting mixed tropical forest dynamics: looking for a strategy , 2005 .

[25]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  A matrix model of uneven-aged forest management. , 1980 .

[26]  P. Barreto,et al.  Costs and benefits of forest management for timber production in eastern Amazonia , 1998 .

[27]  M. Lentini,et al.  Beyond Reaping the First Harvest: Management Objectives for Timber Production in the Brazilian Amazon , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[28]  Denis Valle,et al.  Evaluation of yield regulation options for primary forest in Tapajós National Forest, Brazil , 2006 .

[29]  M. Cochrane,et al.  National Forests in the Amazon , 2002, Science.

[30]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  GROWTH AND YIELD OF A TROPICAL RAIN FOREST IN THE BRAZILIAN AMAZON 13 YEARS AFTER LOGGING , 1995 .