Properties of Teacher Networks in Twitter: Are They Related to Community-Based Peer Production?

Teachers participate in social networking sites to share knowledge and collaborate with other teachers to create education-related content. In this study we selected several communities in order to better understand the networks that these participants establish in Twitter and the role that the social network plays in their activity within the community, especially related with peer production. We analyzed the topology of these networks in two ways: a) the indirect relations by counting followers and followed people; and b) the conversational networks by counting mentions in tweets. We also analyzed the communities’ websites in order to elucidate whether their production was lightweight or heavyweight peer production. Results indicate that teacher networks adopt a community clusters archetype in which some teachers act as bridges between several groups. Although these networks do not form a tight crowd, their degree of tightness is superior to that of the general networks established in Twitter. Our results also indicate that the degree of tightness is important for sustaining heavyweight peer production and strong leadership can play a crucial role in establishing long-term commitment to a collective task.

[1]  Stefania Manca researcher,et al.  Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning , 2012 .

[2]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[3]  Iolanda Garcia,et al.  Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review , 2016 .

[4]  P. Wesely.  Investigating the Community of Practice of World Language Educators on Twitter , 2013 .

[5]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Crowds and Communities: Light and Heavyweight Models of Peer Production , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Daniel G. Krutka,et al.  How and Why Educators Use Twitter: A Survey of the Field , 2014 .

[7]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[8]  Kerry Davis,et al.  Teachers’ perceptions of Twitter for professional development , 2015, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  E. Wenger,et al.  Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework , 2011 .

[10]  Clara Pereira Coutinho,et al.  Social networks as spaces for informal teacher professional development: challenges and opportunities , 2013, Int. J. Web Based Communities.

[11]  Claire Bradley,et al.  Designing social media for informal learning and knowledge maturing in the digital workplace , 2012, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[12]  Fan-Chuan Tseng,et al.  A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers' online professional community of practice , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization , 2010, Bioinform..

[14]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  C. Pipper,et al.  [''R"--project for statistical computing]. , 2008, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[16]  Andrea Forte,et al.  Grassroots Professional Development: How Teachers Use Twitter , 2012, ICWSM.

[17]  Rizal Setya Perdana.  What is Twitter , 2013 .

[18]  Jeffrey P. Carpenter,et al.  Engagement through microblogging: educator professional development via Twitter , 2015 .

[19]  H. Risser.  Virtual induction: A novice teacher's use of Twitter to form an informal mentoring network , 2013 .

[20]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[21]  Jon Dron,et al.  How the Crowd Can Teach , 2011 .

[22]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[23]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Weak Ties in Networked Communities , 2005, Inf. Soc..