Validation of the sodium void reactivity effect prediction using JEFF-3.1 nuclear data

Abstract Near 60 Na void experiments performed in the zero power reactors MASURCA (CEA-Cadarache) and ZPPR (Argonne West – Idaho) have been analyzed using JEFF-3.1 nuclear data and the ERANOS-2.1 (deterministic) and TRIPOLI-4 (Monte-Carlo) codes. Some comparative calculations have been performed also using either JEFF-3.1, ENDF/B-VII.0 or JENDL-3.3 nuclear data for 23 Na, as these three 23 Na evaluations show marked differences. The Na void experiments have been selected to cover spectral conditions ranging from the relatively hard flux in the outer zone of a small fast reactor to the relatively soft flux in the inner zone of a large fast reactor. For in-fuel Na void patterns, there is a good agreement between ERANOS and TRIPOLI computations, while the deterministic calculations significantly underestimate the leakage component for Na void patterns in fertile regions. The agreement between ERANOS-2.1 + JEFF-3.1 predictions and experimental values is excellent for in-fuel Na void patterns in MASURCA experiments, but a significant underestimation of the leakage component occurs for in-fuel Na void patterns in ZPPR. For fertile Na void patterns, there is a clear underestimation of the leakage component, quantitatively different for MASURCA and ZPPR experiments. Variations in 23 Na cross-section data also result in significant differences: ENDF/B-VII.0 and JENDL-3.3 nuclear data for 23 Na increase noticeably the predicted Na void worth values with respect to JEFF-3.1 data. The three 23 Na evaluations differ at high energy (>500 keV, and especially >2 MeV), and this stresses the need for accurate additional measurements in this energy range.

[1]  Horst-Michael Prasser,et al.  Sustainability of uranium sources; International Conference on the Physics of Reactors "Nuclear Power: A Sustainable Resource" (PHYSOR'08); ; International Conference on the Physics of Reactors "Nuclear Power: A Sustainable Resource" : Proceedings : 14-19 September 2008, Interlaken, Switzerland , 2008 .

[2]  G. Rimpault,et al.  ERANOS 2.1 : International Code System for GEN IV Fast Reactor Analysis , 2006 .

[3]  D. F. Da Cruz,et al.  On the evaluation of 23Na neutron-induced reactions and validations , 2010 .

[4]  G. Humbert,et al.  Parametric Studies on Heterogeneous Cores for Fast Breeder Reactors: The Pre-Racine and Racine Experimental Programs , 1984 .

[5]  C. B. Carrico,et al.  Variational nodal transport methods with anisotropic scattering , 1993 .

[6]  G. Rimpault,et al.  Improved performances of the fast reactor calculational system ERANOS-ERALIB1 due to improved a priori nuclear data and consideration of additional specific integral data 1 1 Sponsored by BNFL. , 2003 .

[7]  G. Palmiotti,et al.  Optimized Two-Dimensional S n Transport (BISTRO) , 1990 .

[8]  Giuseppe Palmiotti,et al.  Simplified spherical harmonics in the variational nodal method , 1997 .

[9]  Mark L Williams,et al.  Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis for Eigenvalue-Difference Responses , 2007 .

[10]  Philip R. Page,et al.  ENDF/B-VII.0: Next Generation Evaluated Nuclear Data Library for Nuclear Science and Technology , 2006 .

[11]  Robert Hill,et al.  Evaluation of Liquid-Metal Reactor Design Options for Reduction of Sodium Void Worth , 1991 .

[12]  Massimo Salvatores,et al.  EQUIVALENT GENERALIZED PERTURBATION THEORY (EGPT) , 1986 .

[13]  C. B. Carrico,et al.  Three-Dimensional Variational Nodal Transport Methods for Cartesian, Triangular, and Hexagonal Criticality Calculations , 1992 .

[14]  H. Takano,et al.  Japanese Evaluated Nuclear Data Library Version 3 Revision-3: JENDL-3.3 , 2002 .

[15]  Gérald Rimpault,et al.  THE ERANOS CODE AND DATA SYSTEM FOR FAST REACTOR NEUTRONIC ANALYSES , 2002 .