Real Time Hybrid Model Predictive Control for the Current Profile of the Tokamak à Configuration Variable (TCV)

Plasma stability is one of the obstacles in the path to the successful operation of fusion devices. Numerical control-oriented codes as it is the case of the widely accepted RZIp may be used within Tokamak simulations. The novelty of this article relies in the hierarchical development of a dynamic control loop. It is based on a current profile Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm within a multiloop structure, where a MPC is developed at each step so as to improve the Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) global scheme. The inner control loop is composed of a PID-based controller that acts over the Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) system resulting from the RZIp plasma model of the Tokamak a Configuration Variable (TCV). The coefficients of this PID controller are initially tuned using an eigenmode reduction over the passive structure model. The control action corresponding to the state of interest is then optimized in the outer MPC loop. For the sake of comparison, both the traditionally used PID global controller as well as the multiloop enhanced MPC are applied to the same TCV shot. The results show that the proposed control algorithm presents a superior performance over the conventional PID algorithm in terms of convergence. Furthermore, this enhanced MPC algorithm contributes to extend the discharge length and to overcome the limited power availability restrictions that hinder the performance of advanced tokamaks.

[1]  A. Fasoli Overview of Physics Research on the TCV Tokamak , 2009 .

[2]  Stefano Coda,et al.  Real time control of plasmas and ECRH systems on TCV , 2009 .

[3]  Aitor J. Garrido,et al.  Control-oriented Automatic System for Transport Analysis (ASTRA)-Matlab integration for Tokamaks , 2011 .

[4]  Stefano Coda,et al.  Distributed digital real-time control system for TCV tokamak , 2014 .

[5]  J. M. Maestre,et al.  Distributed Model Predictive Control: An Overview and Roadmap of Future Research Opportunities , 2014, IEEE Control Systems.

[6]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Plasma current, position and shape feedback control on EAST , 2013 .

[7]  Lieven Vandevelde,et al.  Anticipating and Coordinating Voltage Control for Interconnected Power Systems , 2014 .

[8]  O. Sauter,et al.  Real-time sawtooth control and neoclassical tearing mode preemption in ITER , 2014 .

[9]  M Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  Real-time optical plasma boundary reconstruction for plasma position control at the TCV Tokamak , 2014 .

[10]  T. C. Luce,et al.  Realizing Steady State Tokamak Operation for Fusion Energy , 2009 .

[11]  Aitor J. Garrido,et al.  Optimization of the Heating System Use in Aged Public Buildings via Model Predictive Control , 2016 .

[12]  A. Fasoli An upgraded TCV for tokamak physics in view of ITER and DEMO , 2013 .

[13]  Faa Federico Felici,et al.  Development and validation of a tokamak skin effect transformer model , 2012 .

[14]  B. P. Duval,et al.  A scoping study of the application of neutral beam heating on the TCV tokamak , 2011 .

[15]  Stefano Coda,et al.  The Science Program of the TCV Tokamak: Exploring Fusion Reactor and Power Plant Concepts , 2015 .

[16]  Hak-Man Kim,et al.  Application of Model Predictive Control to BESS for Microgrid Control , 2015 .

[17]  Mato Baotic,et al.  Multi-Parametric Toolbox (MPT) , 2004, HSCC.

[18]  Kun Liu,et al.  Optimal Real-Time Scheduling for Hybrid Energy Storage Systems and Wind Farms Based on Model Predictive Control , 2015 .

[19]  Tri-Vien Vu,et al.  A Model Predictive Control Approach for Fuel Economy Improvement of a Series Hydraulic Hybrid Vehicle , 2014 .

[20]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Model predictive control: Theory and practice - A survey , 1989, Autom..

[21]  Imad M. Jaimoukha,et al.  Modeling and control of TCV , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[22]  Stefano Coda,et al.  Tokamak equilibrium reconstruction code LIUQE and its real time implementation , 2015 .

[23]  Mark R. Greenstreet,et al.  Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[24]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Real-time input-constrained MPC using fast gradient methods , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[25]  M. G. Sevillano,et al.  SLIDING-MODE LOOP VOLTAGE CONTROL USING ASTRA-MATLAB INTEGRATION IN TOKAMAK REACTORS , 2012 .

[26]  David Ward,et al.  On the physics guidelines for a tokamak DEMO , 2013 .

[27]  Izaskun Garrido Hernandez,et al.  ASTRA — Matlab integration for the control of tokamaks , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation.

[28]  J. B. Lister,et al.  Plasma equilibrium response modelling and validation on JT-60U , 2002 .

[29]  G. Cunningham,et al.  High performance plasma vertical position control system for upgraded MAST , 2013 .

[30]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Fast Model Predictive Control Using Online Optimization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[31]  Aitor J. Garrido,et al.  Low Effort Nuclear Fusion Plasma Control Using Model Predictive Control Laws , 2015 .

[32]  Aitor J. Garrido,et al.  Robust Sliding Mode Control for Tokamaks , 2012 .

[33]  Jos F. Sturm,et al.  A Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones , 1999 .

[34]  Matthew Rowe,et al.  The Real-Time Optimisation of DNO Owned Storage Devices on the LV Network for Peak Reduction , 2014 .

[35]  Izaskun Garrido Hernandez,et al.  Sliding mode control of a tokamak transformer , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[36]  Panagiotis D. Christofides,et al.  Distributed model predictive control: A tutorial review and future research directions , 2013, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[37]  F. Felici,et al.  Real-time physics-model-based simulation of the current density profile in tokamak plasmas , 2011 .