Sacral neuromodulation: Therapy evolution

Objectives: Sacral neuromodulation has gained increased worldwide acceptance as the standard of care in patients with refractory overactive bladder (OAB) and non-obstructive urinary retention (NOUR). This review will detail the evolution of the technology. Materials and Methods: The mechanism of action and advances in treatment, including tined lead, fluoroscopic imaging, and smaller implantable pulse generator (IPG) are reviewed. This discussion also explores expanding indications and future advances including interstitial cystitis, chronic pelvic pain, neurogenic bladder, fecal incontinence, constipation, and dysfunctional elimination syndrome in children. Results: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) exerts its influence by modulation of sacral afferent inflow on storage and emptying reflexes. The tined lead allows for placement and stimulation to be performed in the outpatient setting under local anesthesia with mild sedation. Lead migration has been minimal and efficacy improved. The use of fluoroscopy has improved accuracy of lead placement and has led to renewed interest in bilateral percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE). Bilateral PNE can be performed in the office setting under local anesthesia, making a trial of therapy less expensive and more attractive to patients. A smaller IPG has not only improved cosmesis, but decreased local discomfort and need for revision. The role for SNM continues to expand as clinical research identifies other applications for this therapy. Conclusions: Our understanding of SNM, as well as technological advances in therapy delivery, expands the pool of patients for which this form of therapy may prove beneficial. Less invasive instrumentation may even make this form of therapy appealing to patients without refractory symptoms.

[1]  G. P. Herbison,et al.  Which anticholinergic drug for overactive bladder symptoms in adults. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Improvement in quality of life after botulinum toxin‐A injections for idiopathic detrusor overactivity: results from a randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial , 2009, BJU international.

[3]  C. Ratto,et al.  Long-Term Outcome of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence , 2009, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[4]  M. Spinelli,et al.  Latest technologic and surgical developments in using InterStim Therapy for sacral neuromodulation: impact on treatment success and safety. , 2008, European urology.

[5]  B. Inman,et al.  Sacral neuromodulation for the dysfunctional elimination syndrome: a single center experience with 20 children. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[6]  S. Menefee,et al.  Sacral neuromodulation: cost considerations and clinical benefits. , 2007, Urology.

[7]  M. Elhilali,et al.  Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[8]  S. Siegel,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation for overactive bladder symptoms , 2007 .

[9]  R. Dmochowski,et al.  The Overactive Bladder : Evaluation and Management , 2007 .

[10]  S. Siegel,et al.  Refractory overactive bladder: Beyond oral anticholinergic therapy , 2007, Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India.

[11]  A. Carlson,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: One institution's 11‐year experience , 2007, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[12]  A. Das Sacral Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder , 2007 .

[13]  G. Herbison,et al.  Botulinum toxin injections for adults with overactive bladder syndrome. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Cost-consequence analysis evaluating the use of botulinum neurotoxin-A in patients with detrusor overactivity based on clinical outcomes observed at a single UK centre. , 2006, European urology.

[15]  H. Critchley,et al.  Changes in brain activity following sacral neuromodulation for urinary retention. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[16]  K. Peters,et al.  Expanding indications for neuromodulation. , 2005, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[17]  K. Peters,et al.  Sacral versus pudendal nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: A prospective, single‐blinded, randomized, crossover trial , 2005, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[18]  Teh-Wei Hu,et al.  Costs of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder in the United States: a comparative study. , 2004, Urology.

[19]  M. Spinelli,et al.  New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[20]  R. Dmochowski,et al.  Prospective, randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy and tolerability of the extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine for overactive bladder: results of the OPERA trial. , 2003, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[21]  C. Fowler,et al.  The role of neuromodulation in the management of urinary urge incontinence , 2003, BJU international.

[22]  K. Oleson,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with chronic intractable pelvic pain. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[23]  P. Eerdmans,et al.  Improving neuromodulation technique for refractory voiding dysfunctions: two-stage implant. , 1997, Urology.

[24]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Electrical stimulation in the clinical management of the neurogenic bladder. , 1988, The Journal of urology.

[25]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Sacral root stimulation in controlled micturition. Peripheral somatic neurotomy and stimulated voiding. , 1979, Investigative urology.