Guided Wave and Damage Detection in Composite Laminates Using Different Fiber Optic Sensors

Guided wave detection using different fiber optic sensors and their applications in damage detection for composite laminates were systematically investigated and compared in this paper. Two types of fiber optic sensors, namely fiber Bragg gratings (FBG) and Doppler effect-based fiber optic (FOD) sensors, were addressed and guided wave detection systems were constructed for both types. Guided waves generated by a piezoelectric transducer were propagated through a quasi-isotropic carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) laminate and acquired by these fiber optic sensors. Characteristics of these fiber optic sensors in ultrasonic guided wave detection were systematically compared. Results demonstrated that both the FBG and FOD sensors can be applied in guided wave and damage detection for the CFRP laminates. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of guided wave signal captured by an FOD sensor is relatively high in comparison with that of the FBG sensor because of their different physical principles in ultrasonic detection. Further, the FOD sensor is sensitive to the damage-induced fundamental shear horizontal (SH0) guided wave that, however, cannot be detected by using the FBG sensor, because the FOD sensor is omnidirectional in ultrasound detection and, in contrast, the FBG sensor is severely direction dependent.

[1]  Hiroshi Tsuda,et al.  Ultrasound and damage detection in CFRP using fiber Bragg grating sensors , 2006 .

[2]  Jan Drewes Achenbach,et al.  Extrinsic and intrinsic fiber optic Sagnac ultrasound sensors , 2000 .

[3]  L. Ye,et al.  Quantitative assessment of through-thickness crack size based on Lamb wave scattering in aluminium plates , 2008 .

[4]  P. Cawley,et al.  The interaction of Lamb waves with delaminations in composite laminates , 1993 .

[5]  B. Culshaw,et al.  Advanced layout of a fiber Bragg grating strain gauge rosette , 2006, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[6]  Nobuo Takeda,et al.  Damage identification in a holed CFRP laminate using a chirped fiber Bragg grating sensor , 2007 .

[7]  H. Taylor,et al.  Embedded fiber-optic Fabry-Perot ultrasound sensor , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  S. Krishnaswamy,et al.  Stabilization of an embedded fiber optic Fabry-Perot sensor for ultrasound detection , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Chunhui Yang,et al.  Assessment of delamination in composite beams using shear horizontal (SH) wave mode , 2007 .

[10]  Lingyu Yu,et al.  In-Situ Optimized PWAS Phased Arrays for Lamb Wave Structural Health Monitoring , 2007 .

[11]  J. Rose Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media , 1999 .

[12]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Long range propagation of Lamb waves in chemical plant pipework , 1997 .

[13]  Fuh-Gwo Yuan,et al.  Wave reflection and transmission in composite beams containing semi-infinite delamination , 2008 .

[14]  S. Krishnaswamy,et al.  Response of a fiber Bragg grating ultrasonic sensor , 2003 .

[15]  Kazuro Kageyama,et al.  Doppler effect-based fiber-optic sensor and its application in ultrasonic detection , 2009 .

[16]  Graeme Manson,et al.  Environmental Effects on Lamb Wave Responses from Piezoceramic Sensors , 2003 .

[17]  V. Giurgiutiu Tuned Lamb Wave Excitation and Detection with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring , 2005 .

[18]  V. Giurgiutiu,et al.  In situ 2-D piezoelectric wafer active sensors arrays for guided wave damage detection. , 2008, Ultrasonics.

[19]  Fuh-Gwo Yuan,et al.  Detection of Multiple Damages by Prestack Reverse-Time Migration , 2001 .

[20]  Hyoung-Jun Park,et al.  Linear FBG Temperature Sensor Interrogation with Fabry-Perot ITU Multi-wavelength Reference , 2008, Sensors.

[21]  Zhongqing Su,et al.  A built-in active sensor network for health monitoring of composite structures , 2006 .

[22]  Hiroshi Tsuda,et al.  Fatigue crack propagation monitoring of stainless steel using fiber Bragg grating ultrasound sensors , 2006 .

[23]  T. Ogawa,et al.  Doppler effect in flexible and expandable light waveguide and development of new fiber-optic vibration/acoustic sensor , 2006, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[24]  A. S. Sekhar,et al.  Multiple cracks effects and identification , 2008 .

[25]  Junji Takatsubo,et al.  Investigation of fatigue crack in stainless steel using a mobile fiber Bragg grating ultrasonic sensor , 2007 .

[26]  Constantinos Soutis,et al.  Damage detection in composite materials using lamb wave methods , 2002 .

[27]  Nobuo Takeda,et al.  Development of smart composite structures with small-diameter fiber Bragg grating sensors for damage detection: Quantitative evaluation of delamination length in CFRP laminates using Lamb wave sensing , 2005 .

[28]  P. Cawley,et al.  The interaction of Lamb waves with defects , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[29]  B. Culshaw,et al.  Acousto-ultrasonic sensing using fiber Bragg gratings , 2003 .

[30]  D. Roy Mahapatra,et al.  On the sensitivity of elastic waves due to structural damages : Time-frequency based indexing method , 2009 .

[31]  J. Rose,et al.  Boundary element modeling for defect characterization potential in a wave guide , 2003 .

[32]  T. Sun,et al.  Fiber Optic Sensor Technology: Introduction and Overview , 2000 .

[33]  Lin Ye,et al.  Crack identification in aluminium plates using Lamb wave signals of a PZT sensor network , 2006 .

[34]  M. Feldman Theoretical analysis and comparison of the Hilbert transform decomposition methods , 2008 .

[35]  F. Yuan,et al.  Group velocity and characteristic wave curves of Lamb waves in composites: Modeling and experiments , 2007 .

[36]  Fu-Kuo Chang,et al.  Time-Domain Spectral Element Method for Built-In Piezoelectric-Actuator-Induced Lamb Wave Propagation Analysis , 2008 .