Mach 10 Experimental Database of a Three-Dimensional Scramjet Inlet Flow Field

The present work documents the experimental database of a combined computational and experimental parametric study of the internal aerodynamics of a generic three-dimensional sidewall compression scramjet inlet configuration at Mach 10. A total of 256 channels of pressure data, including static pressure orifices, pitot pressures, and exit flow rakes, along with oil flow and infrared thermography, provided a detailed experimental description of the flow. Mach 10 tests were performed for three geometric contraction ratios (3, 5, and 9), three Reynolds numbers (0.55 x 10\super6 per foot, 1.14 x 10\super6 per foot, and 2.15 x 10\super6 per foot), and three cowl positions (at the throat and two forward positions). For the higher contraction ratios, a large forward separation of the inflow boundary layer was observed, making the high contraction ratio configurations unsuitable for flight operation. A decrease in the free-stream unit Reynolds number (Re) of only a factor of 2 led to a similar upstream separation. Although the presence of such large-scale separations leads to the question of whether the inlet is started, the presence of internal oblique swept shock interactions on the sidewalls seems to indicate that at least in the classical sense, the inlet is not unstarted. The laminar inflow boundary layer therefore appears to be very sensitive to increases in contraction ratio (CR) or decreases in Reynolds number; only the CR = 3 configuration with 0, 25, and 50 percent cowl at Re = 2.15 x 10\super6 per foot operated "on design."

[1]  Robert L. Glass The Loyal Opposition - On Design , 1999, IEEE Software.

[2]  John L. Stollery,et al.  An experimental study of the interaction between a glancing shock wave and a turbulent boundary layer , 2005 .

[3]  Goro Masuya,et al.  Mach 4 testing of scramjet inlet models , 1991 .

[4]  C. Zheng Study of experimental technique of oil flow with emphasis on quantitative determination of the flow position parameters on the surface , 1987 .

[5]  D Holland Scott,et al.  Internal Aerodynamics of a Generic Three-Dimensional Scramjet Inlet at Mach 10 , 2003 .

[6]  Scott D. Holland Mach 10 Computational Study of a Three-Dimensional Scramjet Inlet Flow Field , 1995 .

[7]  C. G. Miller Experimental and predicted heating distributions for biconics at incidence in air at Mach 10 , 1984 .

[8]  C. G. Miller Langley hypersonic aerodynamic/aerothermodynamic testing capabilities - Present and future , 1990 .

[9]  Scott D. Holland,et al.  Inviscid parametric analysis of three-dimensional inlet performance , 1994 .

[10]  C. G. Miller Measured pressure distributions, aerodynamic coefficients and shock shapes on blunt bodies at incidence in hypersonic air and CF4 , 1982 .

[11]  I. E. Beckwith,et al.  Aerothermodynamics and Transition in High-Speed Wind Tunnels at NASA Langley , 1990 .

[12]  Jeffrey S. Hodge,et al.  Wind tunnel blockage study of a generic three-dimensional sidewall compression scramjet inlet at Mach 10 , 1991 .

[13]  Mukerrem Cakmak,et al.  North Carolina State Univ , 1997 .

[14]  Carl A. Trexler,et al.  Performance of an inlet for an integrated scramjet concept , 1974 .

[15]  V. A. Stepanov,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Airframe-Integrated Inlet for High Velocities , 1992 .

[16]  R. F. Meyer A note on a technique of surface flow visualisation , 1966 .

[17]  C. A. Trexler Inlet performance of the integrated Langley scramjet module , 1975 .