Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use

We show that the demand for news varies with the perceived affinity of the news organization to the consumer’s political preferences. In an experimental setting, conservatives and Republicans preferred to read news reports attributed to Fox News and to avoid news from CNN and NPR. Democrats and liberals exhibited exactly the opposite syndrome—dividing their attention equally between CNN and NPR, but avoiding Fox News. This pattern of selective exposure based on partisan affinity held not only for news coverage of controversial issues but also for relatively ‘‘soft’’ subjects such as crime and travel. The tendency to select news based on anticipated agreement was also strengthened among more politically engaged partisans. Overall, these results suggest that the further proliferation of new media and enhanced media choices may contribute to the further polarization of the news audience.

[1]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 2003 .

[2]  Greg J. Duncan,et al.  Multinomial and conditional logit discrete-choice models in demography , 1988, Demography.

[3]  Adam Kowol The theory of cognitive dissonance By , 2008 .

[4]  M. Baum,et al.  Barbarians Inside the Gates: Partisan New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse , 2007 .

[5]  Beth Miller,et al.  How Voters Decide: Information Processing in Election Campaigns , 2007, Perspectives on Politics.

[6]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  The Effect of Survey Mode and Sampling on Inferences about Political Attitudes and Behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet Surveys with Nonprobability Samples , 2007, Political Analysis.

[7]  Seth J. Hill The Opt-in Internet Panel : Survey Mode , Sampling Methodology and the Implications for Political Research , 2007 .

[8]  Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck,et al.  Paul F. Lazarsfeld/Bernard Berelson/Hazel Gaudet, The People’s Choice. How the Voter Makes Up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign, New York/London 1944 , 2007 .

[9]  Michael Pfau,et al.  Mediating the Vote: The Changing Media Landscape in U.S. Presidential Campaigns , 2006 .

[10]  David P. Redlawsk,et al.  How Voters Decide: Information Processing in Election Campaigns , 2006 .

[11]  Kyle L. Saunders,et al.  Exploring the Bases of Partisanship in the American Electorate: Social Identity vs. Ideology , 2006 .

[12]  G. Jacobson,et al.  A Divider, Not a Uniter: George W. Bush and the American People, The 2006 Election and Beyond , 2006 .

[13]  Michael F. Meffert,et al.  The Effects of Negativity and Motivated Information Processing During a Political Campaign. , 2006 .

[14]  A. Abramowitz,et al.  Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections , 2006, The Journal of Politics.

[15]  Jesse M. Shapiro,et al.  Media Bias and Reputation , 2005, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Tim Groseclose,et al.  A Measure of Media Bias , 2005 .

[17]  Krista N. Jenkins,et al.  Book Section: Essay and Review: Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America , 2005 .

[18]  J. Christianson,et al.  Employee choice of consumer-driven health insurance in a multiplan, multiproduct setting. , 2004, Health services research.

[19]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America , 2004 .

[20]  Jay K. Dow,et al.  Multinomial probit and multinomial logit: a comparison of choice models for voting research , 2004 .

[21]  A. Shleifer,et al.  The Market for News , 2003 .

[22]  Steven Kull,et al.  Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War , 2003 .

[23]  F. Cutler The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice , 2002, The Journal of Politics.

[24]  Thomas M. Carsey,et al.  Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American Electorate , 2002 .

[25]  A. Gunther,et al.  Congenial public, contrary press, and biased estimates of the climate of opinion. , 2001, Public opinion quarterly.

[26]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[27]  C. Sunstein Republic.com , 2001 .

[28]  Randolph T. Stevenson,et al.  Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies , 2001 .

[29]  J. Hampton,et al.  The people's choice. , 2001, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[30]  S. Schulz-Hardt,et al.  Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  M. Allen,et al.  Media bias in presidential elections: a meta‐analysis , 2000 .

[32]  S. Merrill,et al.  Spatial Models of Candidate Competition and the 1988 French Presidential Election: Are Presidential Candidates Vote-Maximizers? , 2000, The Journal of Politics.

[33]  J. A. Calvin Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .

[34]  R. Michael Alvarez,et al.  When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections , 1998 .

[35]  J. Logan,et al.  Opportunity and Choice in Socially Structured Labor Markets , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  Steven T. Berry Estimating Discrete-Choice Models of Product Differentiation , 1994 .

[37]  L. Epstein,et al.  The Parties Respond: Changes In The American Party System , 1990 .

[38]  A. Agresti An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[39]  Bart W. Stuck,et al.  A Computer and Communication Network Performance Analysis Primer (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1985; revised, 1987) , 1987, Int. CMG Conference.

[40]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[41]  L. Ross,et al.  The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  S. Reilly Consequences of party reform , 1985 .

[43]  M. Eichenbaum,et al.  Uncertain lifetimes and the welfare enhancing properties of annuity markets and social security , 1985 .

[44]  Paul D. Sweeney,et al.  Selective exposure: Voter information preferences and the Watergate affair. , 1984 .

[45]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[46]  G. Maddala Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[47]  S. Chaffee,et al.  SELECTIVE EXPOSURE AND THE REINFORCEMENT HYPOTHESIS , 1983 .

[48]  D. McFadden MEASUREMENT OF URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND , 1974 .

[49]  William A. Watts,et al.  Selective Exposure to a Presidential Campaign Appeal , 1974 .

[50]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  Theories of cognitive consistency: a sourcebook. , 1968 .

[51]  J. Freedman,et al.  SELECTIVE EXPOSURE TO INFORMATION: A CRITICAL REVIEW , 1967 .

[52]  Brian Groombridge,et al.  The Effects of Mass Communication , 1965, Mental Health.

[53]  G. Stempel SELECTIVITY IN READERSHIP OF POLITICAL NEWS , 1961 .

[54]  H. McClosky,et al.  Issue Conflict and Consensus among Party Leaders and Followers , 1960, American Political Science Review.

[55]  E. Lehmann,et al.  Testing Statistical Hypothesis. , 1960 .

[56]  J. Klapper The effects of mass communication , 1960 .

[57]  Richard F. Carter,et al.  Effectiveness of a Political Telethon , 1959 .