Ambulatory measurement of the scapulohumeral rhythm: intra- and inter-operator agreement of a protocol based on inertial and magnetic sensors.

To measure the scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR) in outpatient settings, the motion analysis protocol named ISEO (INAIL Shoulder and Elbow Outpatient protocol) was developed, based on inertial and magnetic sensors. To complete the sensor-to-segment calibration, ISEO requires the involvement of an operator for sensor placement and for positioning the patient's arm in a predefined posture. Since this can affect the measure, this study aimed at quantifying ISEO intra- and inter-operator agreement. Forty subjects were considered, together with two operators, A and B. Three measurement sessions were completed for each subject: two by A and one by B. In each session, the humerus and scapula rotations were measured during sagittal and scapular plane elevation movements. ISEO intra- and inter-operator agreement were assessed by computing, between sessions, the: (1) similarity of the scapulohumeral patterns through the Coefficient of Multiple Correlation (CMC(2)), both considering and excluding the difference of the initial value of the scapula rotations between two sessions (inter-session offset); (2) 95% Smallest Detectable Difference (SDD(95)) in scapula range of motion. Results for CMC(2) showed that the intra- and inter-operator agreement is acceptable (median≥0.85, lower-whisker ≥ 0.75) for most of the scapula rotations, independently from the movement and the inter-session offset. The only exception is the agreement for scapula protraction-retraction and for scapula medio-lateral rotation during abduction (inter-operator), which is acceptable only if the inter-session offset is removed. SDD(95) values ranged from 4.4° to 8.6° for the inter-operator and between 4.9° and 8.5° for the intra-operator agreement. In conclusion, ISEO presents a high intra- and inter-operator agreement, particularly with the scapula inter-session offset removed.

[1]  J. D. de Groot,et al.  Comparison between tripod and skin-fixed recording of scapular motion. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Andrew R Karduna,et al.  Three-dimensional scapulothoracic motion during active and passive arm elevation. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  A R Karduna,et al.  Dynamic measurements of three-dimensional scapular kinematics: a validation study. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  F C T van der Helm,et al.  Shoulder function: the perfect compromise between mobility and stability. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  T. Cook,et al.  Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[6]  G R Johnson,et al.  A method for the measurement of three-dimensional scapular movement. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  Laura Rocchi,et al.  Ambulatory measurement of shoulder and elbow kinematics through inertial and magnetic sensors , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[8]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  Pietro Garofalo,et al.  Inter-operator reliability and prediction bands of a novel protocol to measure the coordinated movements of shoulder-girdle and humerus in clinical settings , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[10]  Andreas Kontaxis,et al.  Adaptation of scapula lateral rotation after reverse anatomy shoulder replacement , 2008, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[11]  M. Morris,et al.  The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: a systematic review. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[12]  F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.  Three-dimensional recording and description of motions of the shoulder mechanism. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  A. Karduna,et al.  Direct 3-dimensional measurement of scapular kinematics during dynamic movements in vivo. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[14]  A. Cappello,et al.  A new formulation of the coefficient of multiple correlation to assess the similarity of waveforms measured synchronously by different motion analysis protocols. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[15]  C.G.M. Meskers,et al.  3D shoulder position measurements using a six-degree-of-freedom electromagnetic tracking device. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  H. K. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  Paula M Ludewig,et al.  The association of scapular kinematics and glenohumeral joint pathologies. , 2009, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[18]  Anthony M J Bull,et al.  Skin-fixed scapula trackers: a comparison of two dynamic methods across a range of calibration positions. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Bing Yu,et al.  The Repeatability of Scapular Rotations Across Three Planes of Humeral Elevation , 2005, Research in sports medicine.

[20]  Jaap Harlaar,et al.  Recording scapular motion using an acromion marker cluster. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[21]  J. Weir Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. , 2005, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[22]  Paula M Ludewig,et al.  Comparison of scapular kinematics between elevation and lowering of the arm in the scapular plane. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.